The Truth

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

You had to figure it would happen. The New York Times, the "Paper Of Record," and the paper that endorsed Hillary Rodham-Clinton for President, is now looking for excuses to explain how a rookie politician "Defeated The Clinton Machine."

Hillary Clinton known for having more testerone than a lot of men, should call up the Times and tell them to "Stop Making With The Excuses." The Times like Ms. Clinton, is using the "Gender Card," as a way to explain away her stunning defeat to Obama. I find this to be an interesting approach, given the fact that this arrogant woman had all but announced her "Coronation," long before the democrat primaries began!

The socialist media bought into the Clinton hype, and started to lay palms at her feet!

Now, the disingenous New York Times is saying that Ms. Clinton's gender was a key factor in her losing the nomination to Barack Obama.

As unbelievable as this sounds, The New York Times seems to forget that Ms. Clinton ran against "A Black Man." Although the Times appears to forget this "Tiny" piece of information, let us not forget that this race-baiting woman and her bigoted husband never missed an opportunity to call on Whites to vote for her, and not Obama, because "He Was The Black Guy."

I know she didn't say it exactly that way, but "An Idiot" could read between the lines of, "Hillary Speak."

This nasty, bitter woman, has no one to blame for her "Welcomed Defeat," but herself. She started out being one of the most hated people in America. The Times conveniently left this out of their story. She also "Ran" a botched campaign. This too was omitted. This "Haunty Woman" stupidly thought that she would have the nomination sewn up by "Super Tuesday." So confident was Hillary Clinton, that she did not plan for caucases, and and she did plan beyond Super Tuesday. Obama, unlike Ms. Clinton, was prepared to do battle until the last primary. When she realized that she was in a dog fight, Ms. Clinton "Got Even More Uglier Than She Already Is." Husband Bill, also got into the dirt, and pitted Whites against Blacks; educated Whites against, non-educated Whites; upper income people against, lower income Americans!

Hillary Diane Rodham-Clinton showed that being White in America still counted for something, especially when you involke, "The Black Bogey Man Scenario." This despicable scene has been repeated by racists people going all the way back to the silent movie, "Birth Of A Nation."

The upshot of this racist movie was that a Black man had "Raped A White Woman." To the rescue came the KKK.

In bringing up the "Black Bogey Man Theory" today, Hillary Clinton sees herself as the, White Woman In Distress." And you guessed it, that "Black Buck Is Barack Hussein Obama."

But, we are living in a different era.  what Ms. Clinton didn't count on were "Decent Whites, Individuals Who Are Sick And Tired Of People Like Bill And Hillary Clinton." These people voted for Barack Obama. While she used "Fear-Mongering Techniques, And Appealed To Haters," Barack Obama was steady, and reached out to "All Americans."

Although he shot himself in the foot with being as associate of the Reverend Wright, and Weatherman, Bill Ayers, Obama was still able to defeat this incompetent woman. I believe that he was able to do this, because Americans just "Don't Like Hillary Rodham-Clinton."

Maybe, once she comes to the realization that she "Will Never Be President Of This Country," Ms. Clinton will take some time and reflect on why a repugnant person like herself was rejected by the American people. Here's a hint: Americans still believe in fair play. This is something that this woman doesn't understand. At least, not at this point!

To be blunt, this race-baiter thought that all she needed to do was to use the color of her skin as a way to propel her rather large derriere into the White House. But, Americans told her they want the, "Most Competent Person Living At 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue."

And, that person isn't Hillary Rodham-Clinton!

Throughout the campaign, Clinton boasted about her thirty-five years of experience. If we measure how she ran her campaign, which was horrendous, with what type of a President she would have made, I think we now have the answer. She would have been a disaster!

Still, there are a number of White women who are screaming that Obama "Stole The Nomination From Ms. Clinton." How ridiculous is that? According to these knuckleheads, we have had "White Men As Presidents Since This Country's Inception, Now It Was Their Turn."

I don't believe that these racists women realize they are racists. This is how deeply ingrained their hatred for people who don't look like them is. So, when they say, "It Is Our Turn," they certainly aren't  talking about women of color. People like this have got to learn.  We live in a country of many different ethnicities. "No One Has A Lock On Being An American Anymore."

But, I don't blame these poor, misguided women. I blame Hillary Rodham-Clinton and the socialists press. I blame Ms. Clinton because she is the one who perpetuated this sense of entitlement. I blame the press because these cowards didn't have the courage to call it for what it is, "Racism."

To all of the White women who say it was "Their  Turn," I say, "You Should Try Being Black." No, let me amend that. You should have been a Black woman like my Grandmother, on my father's side. Mary Alice Lewis was born in 1899. Black women during those days took whatever type of work that came their way. They washed the clothes of Whites, took care of their children, "Nursed Their Babies" "Shook Tobacco(Those Of You From A Southern Tobacco State Know What I Mean), cleaned their houses, and prepared their meals.

In short, Black women worked their asses off!

And, they didn't cry like babies. These women took their lumps, without nary a complain. "That Which Does Not Kill You, Only Makes You Stronger!"

These women believed in fair play, not jumping the line in front of others. While the New York Times has found a group of whining women, I believe that this will be the legacy of Hillary Rodham-Clinton. Her legacy will be that:

* She was a race-baiter

* She was a proponent of "White Supremacy"

* She encouraged White females to see themselves as "Special"

* She and Bill Clinton stuck a knife into the backs of

   African-Americans

The New York Times story was a typical liberal look at this flawed candidate. Since they endorsed her, this ultra-left paper couldn't come out and tell us the truth as to why Clinton bombed.

But, the Times missed the point as to why Hillary Clinton did not received her party's nomination. It had nothing to do with her gender. For the love of God, this insatiable woman had the "Entire Democrat Party Behind Her." She had hundreds of "Superdelegates Lined Up, Even Before The First Primary."

So, it is with incredible chutzpa that the New York Times explains Ms. Clinton's defeat by simply saying that Barack Obama and everyone else ganged up on her because she is a woman. That is just utter nonsense!

The Times is simply lying to Hillary Clinton, as a way to ease her eventual fall.

Believe me, when she crashes, it will be a thud heard around the world!

If the New York Times were true friends of this arrogant women, they would tell her the truth!

That's what friends are for!