"THE SLEAZY CLINTONS ARE CAUGHT AGAIN DOUBLE DEALING"
BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS
How many times does the public have to be told, "Don't Trust The Clintons?"
Even though the public has been given ample proof that this pair is as sleazy as they come, the general public insists on trusting Bill and Hillary Rodham-Clinton. It seems that some people "Just Can't Get Enough Pain." The Clintons are more than willing to oblige them, in meting out more of what they have given them in the past, and that is "Pain!"
This is one writer who is not surprised by a Los Angles Times expose' that says Bill Clinton has a fundraising relationship with a Chinese Internet Company that is accused of working with "Red China." The L.A. Times reports that Alibaba Inc., posted a Chinese government "Most Wanted Posting On Its Yahoo China Homepage." The posting called on its internet users to provide the Red Chinese with information on Tibetan activists suspected of being the ringleaders of recent riots in Tibet. Of course, Hillary will deny that she knew nothing about this clear violation of "Human Rights."
She is much too busy conning voters in Pennsylvania with commercials, that accuse Barack Obama of being an "Elitist." Folks, in the larger scheme of things which story is more important at this juncture? I would say old Billy Boy's connection to this "Red Chinese Internet Company." But, our wonderful press is too busy focusing on the mundane, to let you know what is really going on in the "Real World."
You know that if this were Barack Obama, the sycophants in the socialists media would cover this story, like "Fleas On An Old Hound Dog." But since it is "Queen Hillary," these lapdogs have turned a blind eye to a major story, thus depriving its viewers, readers and listeners of a critical news story. This is more in keeping with being a resident of "Red China Or Communist Russia." The American people need to know that once this genie is let out of the bottle, and that is only reporting news that fits the template of the socialists left, then it won't be long before this becomes the norm. I have noticed a steady decline in professionalism in the socialists media over the past months.
At this point, these arrogant people appear to not care what you and I think. So what if they openly support one candidate over another. So what, if you are Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, and you not only support Hillary Rodham-Clinton, but you will also cover for her, once she lands in hot water. So what, if you are Joe Scarborough, who openly disdains Barack Obama. So what if you are Micha Brenzenski, who is an unapologetic liberal democrat, and Hillary Clinton backer. So what, if you are Wolfe Blitzer of CNN, who has no clue as to the meaning of the word "Fair." So what, if you are "Bully Bill O'Reilly" who abuses his rights as a broadcaster, and hammers people he loathes over the head with his "Microphone."
The American people used to be able to listen to the news and get just that, "Unfiltered New." Today, we are overpowered with the opinions of some knucklehead, who has the I.Q. of "A Sink." Some of the dumbest people on this planet can be found, sitting behind a microphone. And yet, they think we are interested in what they think of the world. These people are truly full of themselves!
I am finding myself more and more, resorting to finding my news on the internet. I don't know about you, but I am tired of having my intelligence insulted by these buffoons!
But, this story from the Los Angles Times "SCREAMS" to be told. Here we have people who are being murdered by Communist thugs from Mainland China, yet our "Elite Media" is too busy to tell us that a supporter of Bill Clinton is supportive of this carnage!
Of course, Hillary Clinton has taken a strong stance against the actions of Mainland China. She has even gone so far as to call on president Bush to boycott the olympic's opening ceremonies in Beijing. Like, what is that suppose to accomplish? Just more feel good politics from this hypocrite!
By the way, it was Bill Clinton who spoke to a group of Alibaba Inc. executives at a conference of Internet executives in Hangzhou, China in september 2005. Good old "Dollar Bill" turned down his usual speaker's fee, said to be in the neighborhood of "$100,000 to $400,000." Ah, but don't think that "Dollar Bill" allowed his largess to get the beter of him. Instead, "Dollar Bill" told his Chinese hosts to donate an "Unspecified Private Donation To The William J.(Dollar Bill) Clinton Foundation."
And you wonder why this huckster isn't willing to reveal "All Of the Names Of Companies That He has Spoken To." An idiot can see that this man is hiding valuable information from the American public. The American people should be demanding to know, what other odios groups have this chronic liar, spoken to. But, thus far, they have been reticent!
This is what the L.A. Times had to say concerning Clinton's clandestine speaking engagements:
"The former president's charity has raised more than $500 Million over the last decade and has been lauded for its roles in disaster response, AIDS prevention and Third World medical and poverty relief. But his reliance on influential foreign donors and his foundation's refusal to release its list of donors have led to repeated questions about the sources and transparency of his fundraisng--even as Hillary Clinton has talked on the campaign trail about relying on him as a roving international ambassador if she is elected president"
It is easy to see why Ms. Clinton would prefer to switch to other less serious issues. It takes the heat off of her. But, it is the fault of the American people who allow the Clintons to get away with this sleazy behavior.
By the way, have you noticed how Ms. Clinton will bristle whenever she is nailed by a reporter. This is clearly a defense mechanism, which says, "I'm cornered." Instead of going after her, I have seen reporters time and time again, back down from this "Bully." I can tell you that, in the old days, a reporter would have dug deeper into her fat rear. Today's so-called reporters are nothing but, "Fluff."
When I think about how much money the Clinton's have made, I have to admit that a smile will come across my face. Because, something is definitely wrong with this picture. Yet, she is allowed by her friends in the media, to get away with calling Barack Obama, "An Elitist."
And what about the people in Pennsylvania? Ms. Clinton has certainly worked her Mojo on them. Even some of these "Groupthinkers," are calling Obama an Elitist.
Hey, "You Folks In Pennsylvania, Hillary And Bill Earned 109-Million Dollars In Less Than 10-Years." Are you listening? You people are "Being Played."
A final thought: You have seen liberals driving around with stickers on the bumpers of their cars that read, "Free Tibet." Why haven't we heard an uproar from these people, directed at Bill Clinton?
Furthermore, I wonder what the actor Richard Gere, a big supporter of Tibet, thinks of our former "Glorious President?"
Surely, he must read the Los Angles Times!
Comment(s) »
» Leave a comment
- Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
- Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
- The line and paragraph breaks automatically
Comment by Barry G.— 2008/04/16 @ 03:39 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/16 @ 03:42 PM — (Reply)
There's no doubt about a political double standard AND a biased media. Even though bias may often be in the eye of the beholder. As an aside, when the story came out about Obama's latest comments about small town America I noticed that CNN had NOTHING up about it but Fox had it as their lead story. Too funny.
Comment by Burns— 2008/04/16 @ 07:19 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/16 @ 11:34 PM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2008/04/16 @ 11:16 PM — (Reply)
Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/17 @ 12:00 AM — (Reply)
Comment by riffran— 2008/04/17 @ 12:06 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Ed— 2008/04/17 @ 02:39 AM — (Reply)
Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/17 @ 04:30 AM — (Reply)
Comment by mos— 2008/04/17 @ 03:58 AM — (Reply)