The Truth

Reporting facts. Not rumours. Politically, I am a Conservative. My concerns are myriad for this country. I will shine the light of "Truth" on any politician, who threatens this land that I love. Yes, that includes members of the "Political Right."

2008/4/16

"THE SLEAZY CLINTONS ARE CAUGHT AGAIN DOUBLE DEALING"

@ 02:57 PM (3 months, 9 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

 

How many times does the public have to be told, "Don't Trust The Clintons?"

Even though the public has been given ample proof that this pair is as sleazy as they come, the general public insists on trusting Bill and Hillary Rodham-Clinton. It seems that some people "Just Can't Get Enough Pain." The Clintons are more than willing to oblige them, in meting out more of what they have given them in the past, and that is "Pain!"

This is one writer who is not surprised by a Los Angles Times expose' that says Bill Clinton has a fundraising relationship with a Chinese Internet Company that is accused of working with "Red China." The L.A. Times reports that Alibaba Inc., posted a Chinese government "Most Wanted Posting On Its Yahoo China Homepage." The posting called on its internet users to provide the Red Chinese with information on Tibetan activists suspected of being the ringleaders of recent riots in Tibet. Of course, Hillary will deny that she knew nothing about this clear violation of "Human Rights."

She is much too busy conning voters in Pennsylvania with commercials, that accuse Barack Obama of being an "Elitist." Folks, in the larger scheme of things which story is more important at this juncture? I would say old Billy Boy's connection to this "Red Chinese Internet Company." But, our wonderful press is too busy focusing on the mundane, to let you know what is really going on in the "Real World."

You know that if this were Barack Obama, the sycophants in the socialists media would cover this story, like "Fleas On An Old Hound Dog." But since it is "Queen Hillary," these lapdogs have turned a blind eye to a major story, thus depriving its viewers, readers and listeners of a critical news story. This is more in keeping with being a resident of "Red China Or Communist Russia." The American people need to know that once this genie is let out of the bottle, and that is only reporting news that fits the template of the socialists left, then it won't be long before this becomes the norm. I have noticed a steady decline in professionalism in the socialists media over the past months.

At this point, these arrogant people appear to not care what you and I think. So what if they openly support one candidate over another. So what, if you are Andrea Mitchell of NBC News, and you not only support Hillary Rodham-Clinton, but you will also cover for her, once she lands in hot water. So what, if you are Joe Scarborough, who openly disdains Barack Obama. So what if you are Micha Brenzenski, who is an unapologetic liberal democrat, and Hillary Clinton backer. So what, if you are Wolfe Blitzer of CNN, who has no clue as to the meaning of the word "Fair." So what, if you are "Bully Bill O'Reilly" who abuses his rights as a broadcaster, and hammers people he loathes over the head with his "Microphone."

The American people used to be able to listen to the news and get just that, "Unfiltered New."  Today, we are overpowered with the opinions of some knucklehead, who has the I.Q. of "A Sink." Some of the dumbest people on this planet can be found, sitting behind a microphone. And yet, they think we are interested in what they think of the world. These people are truly full of themselves!

I am finding myself more and more, resorting to finding my news on the internet. I don't know about you, but I am tired of having my intelligence insulted by these buffoons!

But, this story from the Los Angles Times "SCREAMS" to be told. Here we have people who are being murdered by Communist thugs from Mainland China, yet our "Elite Media" is too busy to tell us that a supporter of Bill Clinton is supportive of this carnage!

Of course, Hillary Clinton has taken a strong stance against the actions of Mainland China. She has even gone so far as to call on president Bush to boycott the olympic's opening ceremonies in Beijing. Like, what is that suppose to accomplish? Just more feel good politics from this hypocrite!

By the way, it was Bill Clinton who spoke to a group of Alibaba Inc. executives at a conference of Internet executives in Hangzhou, China in september 2005. Good old "Dollar Bill" turned down his usual speaker's fee, said to be in the neighborhood of "$100,000 to $400,000." Ah, but don't think that "Dollar Bill" allowed his largess to get the beter of him. Instead, "Dollar Bill" told his Chinese hosts to donate an "Unspecified Private Donation To The William J.(Dollar Bill) Clinton Foundation."

And you wonder why this huckster isn't willing to reveal "All Of the Names Of Companies That He has Spoken To." An idiot can see that this man is hiding valuable information from the American public. The American people should be demanding to know, what other odios groups have this chronic liar, spoken to. But, thus far, they have been reticent!

This is what the L.A. Times had to say concerning Clinton's clandestine speaking engagements:

"The former president's charity has raised more than $500 Million over the last decade and has been lauded for its roles in disaster response, AIDS prevention and Third World medical and poverty relief. But his reliance on influential foreign donors and his foundation's refusal to release its list of donors have led to repeated questions about the sources and transparency of his fundraisng--even as Hillary Clinton has talked on the campaign trail about relying on him as a roving international ambassador if she is elected president"

It is easy to see why Ms. Clinton would prefer to switch to other less serious issues. It takes the heat off of her. But, it is the fault of the American people who allow the Clintons to get away with this sleazy behavior.

By the way, have you noticed how Ms. Clinton will bristle whenever she is nailed by a reporter. This is clearly a defense mechanism, which says, "I'm cornered." Instead of going after her, I have seen reporters time and time again, back down from this "Bully." I can tell you that, in the old days, a reporter would have dug deeper into her fat rear. Today's so-called reporters are nothing but, "Fluff."

When I think about how much money the Clinton's have made, I have to admit that a smile will come across my face. Because, something is definitely wrong with this picture. Yet, she is allowed by her friends in the media, to get away with calling Barack Obama, "An Elitist."

And what about the people in Pennsylvania? Ms. Clinton has certainly worked her Mojo on them. Even some of these "Groupthinkers," are calling Obama an Elitist.

Hey, "You Folks In Pennsylvania, Hillary And Bill Earned 109-Million Dollars In Less Than 10-Years." Are you listening? You people are "Being Played."

A final thought: You have seen liberals driving around with stickers on the bumpers of their cars that read, "Free Tibet." Why haven't we heard an uproar from these people, directed at Bill Clinton?

Furthermore, I wonder what the actor Richard Gere, a big supporter of Tibet, thinks of our former "Glorious President?"

Surely, he must read the Los Angles Times!

Comment(s) »

  1. Getting geared up for the debate Dr.? I'm ready and I think Obama is going to do great. Andrea Mitchell is a $5 at best ho. You know who surprisingly is an Obama Hillary hater and Obama supporter? Keith Olbermann of all people. I used to despise that jackass.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2008/04/16 @ 03:39 PM — (Reply)

  2. No kidding? I used to despise him also. But, when he took on that arrogant jackass, O'Reilly, I started to see him in a different light. O'Reilly couldn't bully this guy. Yeah, just got my shower done, and it's downstair to watch the debate. Got a highball waiting for me. Prediction: Obama will kick her fat ass.

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/16 @ 03:42 PM — (Reply)

  3. I've never understood how the Clintons avoided scrutiny over many issues thru the years. They didn't call him "Slick Willy" for nothing.

    There's no doubt about a political double standard AND a biased media. Even though bias may often be in the eye of the beholder. As an aside, when the story came out about Obama's latest comments about small town America I noticed that CNN had NOTHING up about it but Fox had it as their lead story. Too funny.

    Comment by Burns— 2008/04/16 @ 07:19 PM — (Reply)

  4. As noted, Fox is in the tank for Hillary. It's a shame to see a once respected network do the same thing as the rest of the socialists press. I used to love Fox News. Not anymore, I can't stand to watch those arrogant bastards; especially, Julie Banderas, who obviously has issues with men. Take a moment and process what this nitwit says. A very angry woman, who has been given access to a microphone! She claims to be "32-years old." The last time she saw thirty two was about ten years ago!

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/16 @ 11:34 PM — (Reply)

  5. Burns was right about beauty being in the eye of the "BEERholder"...lol...wonder how many kamikazis it took to father chelsea...lol....Wonder if Obama is going to rub that one in her face.....Clintongate...how many people will have to "commit suicide" to cover up the facts.....riff

    Comment by riffran— 2008/04/16 @ 11:16 PM — (Reply)

  6. I loved it when Obama nailed Hillary's ass on that issue involving a Weatherman. Here this fat slob was acting holier than thou by chiding Obama for sitting on a community board with this guy. Obama shot back that Bill "Pardongate" Clinton had handed pardons to, "Two Weathermen." She zipped her lying lips real quick!

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/17 @ 12:00 AM — (Reply)

  7. he he he...*snap*.....mornin Doc....Darn I missed that, debate...but its good to hear that hitlery got handed a shit sandwich....lol...riff

    Comment by riffran— 2008/04/17 @ 12:06 AM — (Reply)

  8. All in all an interesting debate. Probably changed few minds if any. I thought Obama did a good job trying to stay above petty politics. Tonight's pundits ought to have their conclusions about the debate finalized. It should be interesting.

    Comment by Ed— 2008/04/17 @ 02:39 AM — (Reply)

  9. It is amazing how the so-called political pundits saw the debate. Many are saying that Hillary won. That left me wondering, (A) Were these jerks drunk, (B) Were they watchig re-runs of the Kennedy/Nixon, 1960 debate. These people probably had their story written a week ago!

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2008/04/17 @ 04:30 AM — (Reply)

  10. were you in star trek.beam me up captain, i mean scotty.haaahaaa get it.c'mon thats funny.dont be so judgemental

    Comment by mos— 2008/04/17 @ 03:58 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically