The Truth

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Okay, now that the New York Times has come out and made it official, that it is a political wing of the democrat party, I think that it is time for the government to reassess whether the Times should be accorded the title of a, "Newspaper."

Mr. Webster describes a newspaper in this manner:

"A publication, us. issued daily or weekly and containing news, comment, features, and advertising"

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution reads as follows:

"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to petition the government for a redress of grevances"

Before looking deeper into the Framers writing of the First Amendment, let's dissect what the definition of a newspaper is. First, Webster says a newspaper is a vehicle for disseminating news. Although clearly bias, the New York Times meets this criteria. Secondly, Mr. Webster says a newspaper writes comments(editorials) and do feature stories. I have no problem here with the Times, especially in the area of editorials, although it is clear the Times is slanted more in favor of the socialists democrats. It is the advertising part  of the definition of what a newspaper is supposed to do, that I have a problem with the New York Times.

The Times not only ran that disgusting ad put together by the socialists over at Moveon.Org, it is widely reported that the New York Times gave Moveon "A Cut Rate." The New York Post is reporting that the Times normally receives "$116,000" for a full-page black and white ad on a Monday. Moveon.Org according to the Post, only paid "65,000" to run its despicable ad, calling General David Petraeus, "General Betray Us." The Post says a spokesman from none other than Moveon, quoted the price to one of its reporters. Busted!

Now that the New York Times has been caught "In Bed With The Democrats," and their slimey friends at Moveon.Org, the question that begs to be answered is when will the Times come out and say they are now changing the name of their paper to "The New York Pravda?"  Pravda was the old "Communist Russian Newspaper" that was a mouthpiece for the politiburo, which was the heart and soul of communist Russia!

The New York Times can never be taken seriously as a newspaper. They crossed the line by jumping into bed with Moveon and the democrats. Their reputation and believability has been forever irreparably damaged!

On the issue of the First Amendment! The Framers said that "Congress shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." As I see it, the Times forfeited this freedom as a legitimate newspaper, when it crossed the line by giving Moveon.Org a cut rate. Never mind the abhorrent ad. When the New York Times "Exposed" itself as being nothing more than a harlot for the socialists democrats and Moveone.Org, it lost its legitimacy to be called a "Newspaper." The Times would do well to now call itself a, "Magazine." A magazine can get away with writing "Dribble And Running Disgusting Ads."

It is my belief that Americans will never look at the New York Times the way that they once saw this paper. The Times has "Outed Itself." And henceforth, its bloviating, and pontificating against the President will be seen as just another hatchet job, by a bunch of left wing zealots: determined to change this country into their warped image!

The New York Times was impulsive in its hatred of the President to allow Moveon.Org to run an ad, at a cut rate price. I opined in my first book the following words, "Impulsivity Is The Cousin Of Stupidity. Think!

The New York Times is full of arrogant blowhards. One would think they would hang their heads in shame. But, not these arrogant, cocky bastards. They were back at it again today. When you are a narcissist, you truly feel that the world revolves around you. The New York Times is no different. The narcissists can not hear criticism. The narcissist can only hear "The Glowing Words Of Others, Directed Toward The Narcissist."

The narcissists at the New York Times wrote in an editorial piece that said, the President "Had Failed In Iraq." These pompous jackasses also pooh-poohed the President's speech on Iraq, where he talked about "a measure of success, we are seeing in Iraq, and we can begin seeing some troops come home."

The "New York Pravda" accused the President of "putting up smokescreens." And "Pravda West" declared:

"Mr. Bush has no strategy to end his disastrous war and no strategy for containing the chaos he unleashed"

A suggestion for the New York Times, AKA, The New York Pravda. "Shut Your Piehole." You have lost "All Credibility With The American People."

You are attempting to protray yourselves as a legitimate newspaper. The American public isn't buying this baloney any longer.

The New York Times should tag each political story that it does from now on with these words, "Not Paid For By Our Friends, The Democrats, Moveon.Org, And Other Sleazy Socialists Groups. We Did This For Nothing!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM