The Truth

Permalink |

2007/9/29

"THIS GUY SHOULD BE MARCHED OUT AND CASTRATED--IMMEDIATELY"

@ 06:37 AM (25 months, 19 days ago)

BY:DR. FOREST LEWIS

I can hear the bleeding heart liberals on the left saying, "But Dr. Lewis, You Just Don't Understand."

Chester Arthur Stiles came from an abusive home--so this is why he abused a three year old girl. You know what, I am sick and tired of hearing this bogus refrain from the left. How about personal responsibility? If you want to know why Americans lack respect for one another; And why they can't seem to accept blame for something that they obviously did, all you need to do is look to your left. There, you will find the culprits responsible for the plight of our country today. It is the left in this country who are constantly making excuses for bad behavior.

For God's sake, it is the left who stopped an execution in Texas the other day. Some slime ball is contesting "Lethal Injection As Being Too Cruel." Oh, this piece of manue didn't consider the cruel and usual way he murdered his victim. but, when it comes to his hide, there you will find that disgusting anti-American group known as the, ACLU, fighting to save his worthless life!

Police say that this pond scum, Chester Arthur Stiles, had the audacity to make a videotape of himself and the little girl. On the tape, this animal is seen sexually assaulting the child, who was dressed in of all things, "A Night Gown." By now, I know that you have seen the picture of this little baby. Her sad eyes tell her tragic story! For her, her nightmare started that day!

Meantime, Stiles a suspect, is on the lamb. Police would like to get their hands on this slob, "Real Bad." This guy is bad news. Prior to becoming a suspect in the rape of the young girl, who was three at the time, police say they were looking for Stiles on an unrelated charge. To the surprise of virtually no one, police in Nye County, Nevada say Stiles is wanted on a charge involving lewdness with a minor, younger than fourteen: And a federal charge of being a fugitive.

The young girl seen in pictures released to the media by police, is now thirteen years old. Police say that at the time of the attack, she was "living with relatives." Authorities say the mother of the child is saying that she had no knowledge of the rape. I don't think police believe that for one minute. She will certainly stay in their crosshairs for sometime, at least until this story is completely fleshed out.

A scumbag by the name of Darren Tuck said he found the tape in "The Desert." Sure he did! Police are now looking for Tuck on a probation violation.

Nevada has Megan's Law on the books. However, Nevada's version of this imporant law "dos not Reqire The State Or Local Law Enforcment To Inform Citizens About How To Get Information On Sex Offenders."

When will Americans wake up and realize that we are faced with a "National Epidemic" involving pedophiles? These criminals wreck the lives of its victims. I know that we see the victims of pedophiles on Oprah, smiling and saying they have "taken their lives back." But, how many of these people are still being held in bondage by:

* The use of drugs to assuage their psychological pain

* Low self-worth

* The need to engage in self-flagellation

* Becoming prostitutes

It is not easy to escape the throes of this type of abuse. To make matters worse, we have jackass judges who hand down what amounts to a slap on the wrists for many of these slimeballs. These heartless bastards, the judges, need to be identified, and hounded by the public, until they get their lazy, fat asses off the bench!

I never thought that I would say this. But, I do agree with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad on one thing. "A Swift Trial--And Death To People Who Rape Innocent Children!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/28

"IS THIS WHAT THEY CALL PUBLIC DISCOURSE AT COLORADO STATE UNIVERSITY?'

@ 03:39 PM (25 months, 20 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

As usual, the socialists press buried this story!

Fox News is the only outlet that I've seen pay any attention to what David McSwane, the editor of the Rocky Mountain Collegian, the student newspaper at Colorado State University, wrote recently. Remember the young college student who was tasered while questioning John Kohn-Kerry last week? Well, McSwane went to press, and wrote in the editorial section, "TASER THIS: F..K BUSH."

It is obvious that McSwane lacks the maturity to engage in public intercourse without resorting to the use of scatological language. I must admit that this comes as a surprise to me. College is a place that one learns how to reason, think, write, express an opinion in a clear manner, listen, read critically, and provide feedback on salient issues. As you know, tuition isn't cheap at any higher institution of learning these days. Yet, you wouldn't know it by the infantile approach McSwane used in his college newspaper. You would think that he had attended some diploma mill university.

The newspaper reportedly has a budget of just under one million dollars. That's a lot of money for a college newspaper. It is said that sponsors are starting to pull the plug. Good for them ! Alumnae are also cancelling pledges! Terrific! I find this refreshing to know that there are still some good/decent people in this country. People who will stand up for right, and denounce wrong!

McSwane's behavior is typical of a liberal. These people are so angry at the world. Their way of problem solving is to use four letter words, lie on their "enemies," and attack the character of people who don't espouse their twisted world view. Their puerile behavior demonstrates their low intelligence quotient. Liberals will tell you that George Bush is an "Idiot." If the president is such an idiot, why does he get such a rise out of these small minded little people so often? Remember, John Kohn-Kerry tried to portray himself as a genius: And the president as a moron. Where is Kohn-Kerry at today? He sits angrily in the U.S. Senate. This incompent boob wouldn't be in the Senate if he didn't come from such an ultra-liberal state.

What is pathetic about this entire episode involving David McSwane is that many on the left support him. I read where one supporter opined:

"Yes, what McSwane did was wrong. Not because such language is verboten in a college publication or that one should not criticize the president. But because it did not express its message clearly and went so far in offending readers that it overshadowed its apparent point"

I'm still trying to figure out McSwane's point. Again, this guy like so many socialists, has this unbridled anger. He is ticked off at the world, because people won't do things, the "David McSwane's Way." I have but three words for this foolish child, "Get Over Yourself." The world doesn't revolve around you. I know this advice will not be heeded by the McSwane's of America. Liberals have a sense of entitlement. They feel that it is their right, to cram down the throats of every American, their socialists/communists ideology.

Sadly, millions of Americans still don't get it. They don't understand that there are millions of David McSwane's out there. And they aren't going away anytime soon. I honestly don't know what will it take for Americans to "Wake Up" and realize that our freedoms are at stake.

Our colleges and universities are turning out millions of mind numb robots like this McSwane character. Occassionally, they will drift off the reservation like this idiot did. But, for the most part, most of these ursurpers of freedom are highly polished. Witness Bill and Hillary Clinton. While you're at it, critique Barack Hussein Obama, and John "The Breck Girl" Edwards. They have mastered "Double Talking," and confusing the hell out of most Americans!

In order to unmask these charlatans, America, you will have to do a better job of "Listening." I do not fear the Islamofascists as much as I fear people like David McSwane. And no, I do not believe that he is an anomaly. I wished that I could say that he was.

David McSwane is a new breed of American. He hates his country: And he will attempt to squash anyone who stands in his way in changing the America that you and I grew up in. Did you ever think you would hear someone say "F..k The President?"

Today, it is harsh words from David McSwane. Tomorrow, it may be too late, if America doesn't wake up to this "Clear And Present Danger That Has Been Hatched In Our Country." Next year will be a pivotal point in this country's history. Americans will need to decide if we will turn the country over to a David McSwane; or reject the message of socialism/communism that is encrypt in the message of the democrats running for president!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/27

"THE CLINTONS PROVE ONCE AGAIN--THEY ARE NOT NICE PEOPLE"

@ 03:11 PM (25 months, 21 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

The Clintons are involved in a brouhaha involving the owner of an Italian restaurant in New York City.

Osso Buco, the owner of Nino Selimaj, has a picture of himself and the Clinton's daughter, Chelsea, hanging on his restaurant wall. Bill Clinton has gotten his "panties in a bunch" over the picture. The former president has personally injected himself into the dispute.

Clinton ordered his lawyer, Douglas J. Band, to send Buco a letter, demanding that he remove Chelsea's picture. The letter stated that since Chelsea is a private citizen, and never gave Buco permission to display the picture, it should be removed forthwith. Buco owns five other restaurants in the Big Apple. He isn't phased by the Clinton lawyer's demanding letter.

In fact, a defiant Buco told reporters, "unless I hear from Chelsea directly, the picture stays." I say good for Buco. The Clintons have shown the world once again, just how petty they are. They are nothing but money grubbing misers. They love to take our money and spread it around. But, when it comes to someone allegedly taking money out of their pockets, they scream like stuck pigs. I would say, shame on the Clintons. But, we know these people have "No Shame."

A bewildered Buco said, "I still don't know the reason for the letter." It's simple. Bill and Hillary Clinton are hypocrites. Bill Clinton has made millions off of the backs of the American people. This man has proven over the years that he is a "User." Hence, the moniker, "Slick Willie."

However, when the shoe is seen as being on the other foot, this scoundrel and his wife,"scream bloody murder."

I say to Mr. Buco, "Don't Let These Schoolyard Bullies, Bully You." Buco reportedly has said, Hillary can "Forget His Vote."

She doesn't care. The only person that this woman cares about is, "Hillary Rodham-Clinton."

By the way, isn't Chelsea Clinton a grown woman: And can't she speak for herself?

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

"HOW TO STAY FOCUSED WHILE DEBATING A LUNATIC FROM THE LEFT"

@ 11:46 AM (25 months, 21 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

While performing my post-doctoral work at a mental health center in Rochester, New York, I will never forget the words of my supervisor. While watching a videotape of a therapy session that I conducted with a patient, he said, he's got you. He has taken you to the "Swamp, And Now He's Waving Goodbye."

I sat in utter amazement. First, I was so impressed with Dr. Baer's clinical skills. Second, I was asking myself, internally, how in the hell did I allow this patient to skillfully "play me?"

He played me because I got caught up in the "content" of the dialogue. Instead of "processing" with the patient what was going on for him, I foolishly focused on the content. When a therapist focuses on only content, there will be no change in the patient. The patient will continue to hold onto his pathology. Psychologists aren't the only ones who deal with content and processing information with individuals. If you dialogue with people, you too are faced with this phenonmenon!

The other day, I was listening to Rush Limbaugh. This smart-ass African-American "Seminar Caller" got through to Rush. He started off the conversation by asking Rush, "how many black people did he know?" Rush fell for what appeared to be a benign question. He asked the caller, "how many white people do you know?" Remember this, there are "No Benign" questions from liberals. Their questions are all designed to place conservatives on the defensive. Once you answer one question, you can bet your last money there will be another question.

Mr. smarty pants next got into this whole issue of whether "white people can be listed as white." As brilliant as Rush is, he fell for this crap also, hook, line and sinker." It was painful to listen to him "wiggle" on this liberal's "fishing line." Liberals don't deal in facts. They don't know how to think logically. What they are good at is:

* Calling people names

* Blaming others for the problems of the world

* Trying to control every movement of an individual

* Defocusing from the topic(s) at hand

* "Not answering a question"

* Making the masses too afraid to even leave their homes in the mornings, i.e., global warming, the stock market is about to crash, etc.

So, how would I have handled this "Seminar Caller." Remember, "Do Not Get Stuck In The Content Of A Conversation." Listed below is how I would have dealt with this mind numb robot:

Dr Lewis: Hello caller

Caller: Dr. Lewis, how many black people do you know?

Dr. Lewis: Why is that important to you?

Caller: Just answer the question

Dr. Lewis: You sound very angry. What are you feeling right now?

Caller: Don't try that head stuff with me

Dr. Lewis: It sounds like you are feeling like I'm trying to control you. Does that make you angry?

Caller: You are afraid to answer the question, aren't you. I got you!

Dr. Lewis: So, what are you feeling right now?

Please notice, I never answered his original question. Instead of being on the defensive like Rush placed himself in, I placed the caller on the defensive. Believe me, it is not as difficult as it seems. You just have to listen to what the liberal is saying, and be prepared to process with him or her what they are feeling. Most of these people are so damn pissed off at the world, that it won't take much for them to say, "YES I'M MAD AS HELL." Once you get them to admit this, just "reel in this lunatic from the left."

Now the question is what do you do with this person? Ronald Reagan is quoted as saying a liberal, "Is A Republican, But He Just Doesn't Know It." Once you have reeled in the liberal, this is a great time to start "de-programming this automaton." That is, if he is open to being de-programmed. Trust me, there are liberal who will switch over to the republican party, if you provide them with a cogent argument for doing so. I was at one time a dyed-in-the wool "liberal."

What I had going for me was, "I have always been a fierce free thinker." As a scientist, I simply do not accept something as a fact without performing vigorous research. I looked at conservatives thoughts on such issues as:

* Lower taxes

* Smaller government

* Doing for self

* Our 2nd Amendment Rightss

* Pro-Life

* A strong military

* God and country

I liked what I heard. I than juxtaposed what the democrats stood for. The democrats woefully came up short. When arguing with a liberal, and you have reeled that person in, "Do Not Beat The Person Over The Head" with your know it all attitude. Be tactful!

Listen to Rush Limbaugh sometimes. And as you listen, you will hear countless people calling the show and telling Rush how he changed them from being a liberal democrat to now being in the camp of conservatives.

Trust me, you can help change America!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (6)

2007/9/26

"I BET THIS MIRRORS THE THOUGHTS AND FEELINGS OF LIBERALS IN YOUR AREA"

@ 05:44 AM (25 months, 22 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

If you live in a liberal area as I do, chances are good that the comments I will share with you, reflects the views of liberals in your city or town!

Dateline--Rochester, New York: In a letter to the editor, a woman from a "Conservative" section of New York State wrote the following:

" I am tired of being called names, such as "communist" and "terrorists" because I voice and display my disagreement with the Bush/Cheney policies concerning the Iraq occupation. The people who criticize me always say that I want "the terrorists to come here." This occupation is all about controlling the oil in Iraq. Iraq has been destroyed by the United States, and its people slaughtered by our soldiers and contractors. By being in Iraq, we are becoming more and more hated, and some citizens there feel they have nothing to lose, so they become suicide bombers. It is wrong for the president to keep our soldiers in a country whre they are not wanted, in the middle of a war between the Sunnis and Shi'ites. Please, readers, get educated on these serious points, and remember: Iraq did not attack us on 9/11, there were no weapons of mass destructions, and the suicide bombers in Iraq do not want to come here. They want their country back, and "to keep their own oil"

I know, where does one start in picking this democrat propaganda thinking apart? First of all, this woman has a right to express her views, without being called names. However, she is misguided on a number of salient issues. The United States has not destroyed Iraq. The destruction of any part of this ancient, historic land was done at the dirty hands of the Islamofascists. They are the ones who preach about "Islam," but at the same time blow up their holy temples. They are the ones who talk about unity, but will murder at will, anyone who disagrees with their warped sense of how the world should be. These are the people who have formented the violence between the various groups in Iraq, "Not The United States."

I will defend this woman's right to free speech, however, I will not defend her outright lying. To say that our soldiers have slaughtered innocent Iraqi people, is irresponsible. It is also a huge lie that the Islamofascists can use throughout the Middle-East, to buttress their cause. It is people like this woman who poses a greater threat to our freedom than a Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. This woman is part of the fifth column that is currently in the United States. Her thinking is so skewed that it wouldn't take much for a skilled Islamofascist to convince her to join their cause. Her letter is replete with anti-American propaganda, and hate!

She is of the opinion that the wackos who put on suicide vests, and go out and blow up innocent people, do so because of our occupation. First of all, most of these people aren't "Iraqis." Secondly, our being in Iraq is not what has created this insane hatred from these people. They have hated us for years. The writer should understand, seeing that she "is so educated," that the Islamofascists hate us because of our way of life. We have freedom in this country, something that these people would never give to their people if they took control of Iraq, as the writer encourages. This woman shows her ignorance of the mores of the Islamofascists. They would "cut her tongue out for being insolent," if she didn't tow the line; And that means donning a berka, and "Shutting Her Mouth."

This woman says we are not wanted in Iraq. Sounds like the talking points from the democrat handbook. I wonder if Nancy Pelosi or Dick Durbin helped her to write this letter? It is a flat out lie to say the Iraqis want us out of their country. It is the Islamofascists who want us to leave. Remember, Osama Bin Laden, and what he had to say in one of his recent videotapes? He chided the democrats for not getting us out of Iraq. Bin Laden understands that if he can control Iraq, and its oil fields, much of the world would be at his mercy. Yet, this foolish woman advises the U.S. to "Cut And Run From Iraq."

The word educate comes from the Latin word, "Educare, Educatus." Both words encourages the bringing forth of knowledge. In order to bring forth previous knowledge, one had to have been "Educated." Many of today's so-called eurdites have been "Mis-Educated." In other words, because you have been educated at a fine university, does not mean that you have received an unbiased education. Lord knows, the socialists and communists who are teaching our kids today, aren't teaching them without injecting a healthy dose of their particular, venomous, anti-American doctrine!

It is obvious that this woman received a "terrible education" in regards to:

* Our role in Iraq

* Our mission in Iraq

* Who the "Real Bad Guys Are"

* What happens to the entire Middle-East if we follow her foolish advice and jettison the Iraqi people

Liberals claim to be desirous of peace. However, they fail to understand that as long as there is a Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, "There Will Never Be Peace." Iraq may not have attacked us on 09/11, but it is too late to say since Iraq didn't personally drive the planes into the World Trade Center, or the Pentagon, we should get out of their country. The fact of the matter is that Iraq is the place to be, if we are to kill as many of these fanatics as we possibly can. This "IS WHERE THE WAR ON TERROR IS NOW TAKING PLACE."

This poor misguided woman says the suicide bombers "do not want to come to the United Stats." Hello, "They Have Already Been Here." Remember the morning of September 11th, 2001? On the question of no weapons of mass destruction found, tell that to the Kurds, who were gassed by Saddam Hussein. The military's best guess is that Saddam moved his WMD's to Syria, before our invasion. Yet, the left loves to stick a finger in the eye of the president, and remind him at every chance they get, "There Were No Weapons Of Mass Destruction Found!"

I don't like saying this, but this woman is just one of millions of Americans who have their heads up their rear ends. We are dealing with an enemy who has made his intentions known. Yet, people like this still aren't getting it. They feel more comfortable in blaming their own country: And living in the land of "Denial." These are the same morons who believes Mahmoud Ahmadinejad who said, "We Love All People, Even The Jews."

This woman has a right to dissent. And I have a right to try and straightened her ass out!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

WWW.CAPITALHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

2007/9/22

"THE CLOWNS ARE STILL RUNNING THE CIRCUS"

@ 11:20 AM (25 months, 26 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Maybe I am not as bright as my Psychology Professors once observed!

A couple of years ago, with the stroke of his pen, President Bush signed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. The signing of this law was supposed to bring to an end, frivolous lawsuits brought by liberal city Mayors against the gun manufacturing industry. These grandstanders said it was the gun industry's fault, that we have so many murders in the United States. Of course, that is stretching logic, just a wee bit too far. Yet, it didn't stop these haters of the 2nd Amendment from pursuing this reckless course of action!

When the President signed the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act, I was one of many who shouted, "Hallelujah!" Our jubilation was short lived, because some arrogant city mayors continued with business as usual. They found equally arrogant judges who were willing to hear their ridiculous arguments against the gun industry. New York City is one of the cities that has told the President that they are "going to do whatever the hell they want to do," and to hell with the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act!

Here is where I am questioning my intellect. I thought that once the President signed this bill, "Game Over." I thought that judges had to follow the law, "not make the law." My wife has accused me of being "Too Logical."

A federal appeals court in New York City listened to two arguments:

* Should the President's signing of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act ended these type of lawsuits?

* Is the law signed by the President, "Lawful"

I can answer the first part of the anti-gunners question. Yes, when the President affixed his "John Hancock" to this law, he put the skids of "All Frivolous Lawsuits Against Gun Manufacturers." End of Story! I believe the federal court can entertain arguments regarding the legitimacy of such a law. However, "No Court" can take it upon itself and say, "Screw Bush," I'm going to still listen to these bogus type of lawsuits. Judges advocating this type of thinking are inviting anarchy! How can they sit and lecture us about obeying the law, when they are in violation of a legal statute?

New York corporation counsel, Michael Cardozo is of the opinion that Congress overstepped its legal authority by passing the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. Personally, I don't give a damn what Cardozo thinks. It is what the courts will ultimately have to say on the matter that is of importance to me. Cardozo said something that is unbeleivable. He said, "There is a war on the judiciary here." A war on the judiciary? How about a war on common sense? We all know that it is people like Mayor Bloomberg, and yes, Rudy Giuliani who attempted to do an end run around the 2nd Amendment by suing gun manufacurers. Memo to Michael Cardozo: Judges interpret the law, not make them!" Stop your whining!

It is incumbent upon every judge in this country who is faced with these ridiculous lawsuits against the gun industry, to recuse themselves: That is until this law is ruled unconstitutional, or constitutional. Until then, the law stands. It is as simple as that.

An attorney representing the gun industry, said it was unfair to blame gun manufacturers for crimes committed "with its products." That makes sense. We don't see the anti-gun zealots running to the courts suing car manufactuers for the thousands of lives taken by motor vehicles every year. By the way, more people die from car accidents than do from guns. The knife industry is not being sued because someone was stabbed to death by a criminal wielding a knife.

The gun grabbers agenda is quite clear. These people will stop at nothing to strangle, and eventually kill the 2nd Amendment. I would like to know, where was the Justice Department during the proceedings in New York City? This is a "Federal Law" that was signed by the President, so why no representation from Justice?

Our culture is slowly being trampled under foot by maverick judges, who are seeking to redefine who we are as a people. U.S. District Judge Jack B. Weinstein is one of these maverick judges. He is the arrogant jackass who is thumbing his nose at the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act.

Now, "Lord Weinstein" is not saying when he will rule on the city's request to proceed with the nonsense of suing gun manufacturers. Do not be surprised if "Lord Weinstein" comes down on the side of the city.

Rudy Giuliani who groveled before the National Rifle Association on Friday, is responsible for creating this "Frankenstein." Now, he is saying maybe he went too far in trying to protect his city.

My response? Hey Rudy, "You Are A Dollar Short, And A Day Late." Tell it to someone who cares!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (6)

2007/9/21

"HAVE YOU NO SHAME--SENATOR CLINTON?"

@ 12:59 PM (25 months, 27 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

The United States Senate has voted to condemn that disgusting ad put out by the socialists group, Moveon.Org.

The ad called General David Petraeus, "General Betray Us." In essense, Moveon said that the General was carrying the water for the Bush White House. There are some who will argue unconvincingly if you ask me, that Moveon.Org has a right to question the veracity of General Peteraeus. To dissent against the war is one thing, but to flat out call this honorable man a liar, is beyond the pale. Have you noticed that it is always the left that accuses conservatives of engaging in name calling? However, when they engage in ad hominems, we don't hear a peep from the socialists press.

Senate republicans were able to push through a resolution which condemns Moveon. The vote was 72-25. Hillary Clinton was one of the twenty five senators who voted against the resolution. Mrs. Clinton thus showed the American people that she respects Moveon.Org more than she respect our troops: And their Commander. This greedy woman also showed that money trumps loyalty to our men and women in uniform. She is more interested in Moveon's greenbacks than supporting our young men and women. Yet, no one can top this hypocritical woman in saying, "I Support The Troops."

House Republican leader, John Boehner of Ohio, is pushing his colleagues to adopt the same resolution. Asked if House Speaker, Nancy "Do Nothing" Pelosi would allow a resolution of this nature to be introduced, spokesman, Nadeam Elshami declared in an e-mail:

"The House is going to devote its full attention to providing health care to children, promoting energy independence to improve american's security, reducing global warming, and responsibly redeploying U.S. forces now in Iraq"

"Jargon, Jargon, Jargon." In other words, Pelosi would move to block this type of a resolution. Her time is better spent "Pretending To Care About Our Troops." Pelosi and the rest of the socialists democrats are invested in our defeat in Iraq. They know that we are winning the war--but they are obsessed with aiding and abetting Al Qaeda, and the rest of the murdering thugs in Iraq.

By the way, Hillary Clinton wasn't the only presidential contender who voted against the resolution. Christopher Dodd who has as much chance of winning his party's nomination as a snow ball in hell has a chance of surviving, also sided with Mrs. Clinton. Barack Hussein Obama who flew back to the Capital for the vote, decided at the eleventh hour not to cast a vote. Obama said that, "by not casting a vote, I registered my protest against the empty politics." Okay, let me understand this. Obama calls standing up against Moveon.Org and supporting General David Petraeus, a stand against empty politics? So, the seventy-two people who voted for the resolution were just playing politics? They weren't interested in sending this hate filled group a strong message? It is Obama who is playing politics. He lacks the backbone to take a stand against Moveon, because he too likes Moveon's "Money."

On another topic, Hillary Clinton said today, "I'm Not A Lesbian." Clinton was commenting on a story found in the New York Daily News. Mrs. Clinton said she understands that the whispers are out there, but there's nothing she can do about them. Personally, I don't care if the woman is a lesbian, which I think she is! If you think she and Bill are getting it on, boy are you gullible. Bill Clinton is never home, and Hillary is constantly on the road. Contrast pictures of this woman from the early 1990's to now. Big difference, huh? Tell me, when was the last time that you saw Hillary Clinton in a skirt or a dress? Is your "Gay-Dar" going off now?

Again, I don't care what her sexual preference is. As we have found out from the falls of others, if Clinton is a lesbian, she will get caught eventually!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

"JUSTICE WAS NOT SERVED--IN THIS CASE"

@ 10:06 AM (25 months, 27 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Shayla Muldrow will spend the next year in jail; And after her release, she will spend an additional six months on probation.

Shayla did the unspeakable in the eyes of a Tampa, Florida Judge. She encouraged her daughter to confront a bully, who in recent days had "Slapped Her Child." Shayla climbed onto a school bus, and told her ten-year old daughter to "Handle It." Her daughter complied, and fought the "Bully." The incident was caught on the school bus' camera.

I don't know about you, but where I come from, this was common practice:And that is, your parent(s) made you stand up to someone who was bullying you. Either you did that, or you faced your mom or dad. I remember a segment of the Andy Griffith Show. Little Opie was being bullied by this kid, who demanded Opie's "Milk Money." He told Opie, either give him the money, or face two blackened eyes. Opie was compliant, that is, until his dad sat him down one day. His dad explained that sometimes a black eye "hurts a lot less than having to be pushed around by a bully."

Opie decided that he had had enough. So, when the young bully approached him and demanded that Opie turn over his milk money, he was surprised to hear young Opie tell him "No." Opie as promised, ended up with two black eyes. However, the bully got his "Butt Kicked." His reign of terror had ended, because someone had the courage to unmask him--and reveal for all to see that he was just a big blowhard!

Parents today, are too busy "raising little girls." This includes the boys who are treated as though they are equipped with more progesterone, than testosterone! There are women in this country today, who could beat the crap out of what we see masquerading around as men. And no, I do not condone violence for the sake of violence. However, I understand this, a bully only understands one thing, and that is "Strength." Take for example our sworn enemies, Iran, Al Qaeda, The Taliban, North Korea, Russia, etc. Do you really think that the leaders of these countries and or groups would have an ounce of respect for the United States, if we did not show them our strength? Of course they wouldn't. I know the democrats believe in "talking to a bully." But, the bully laughs at this tactic. The bully considers this approach a weakness. Why do you think Osama Bin Laden only want democrats in the Congress: And the White House. He understands that the democrats are pushovers. Remember, Bill Clinton?

Bullies are all the same, whether they are the head of a rogue nation, or the schoolyard variety. They only understand one thing, "A Punch In The Mouth." That is, when all else fails. Here is the problem as I see it, if you do not face down the bully, he or she will make your life a "living hell." How many of you tried to negotiate with your neighborhood bully, only to be rebuffed? These people lack the intelligence to sit down at the negotiation table. They have but one thing on their minds, and that is to, "Beat You Like You Stole Something." Liberals live in a fantasy world. They believe that all we need to do with our enemies is to sit down in a circle and sing, "Kum-by-Ya."

Our enemies don't wish to toast marshmallows and sing that stupid song. Same thing goes for the schoolyard bully. Shayla Muldrow understood that the child who slapped her daughter was a little animal. Shayla also understood that the only way to get this Neanthethal off of her daughter's case, was to have her daughter stand up to her.

The judge who sentenced this mother of three to a year in jail, missed the entire point. This pinhead felt that Shayla Muldrow's daughter would turn into a bully; all because she stood up for herself. This pantywaist liberal judge obviously does not understand the dynamics of bullying. Would he have applauded Ms. Muldrow, had she allowed her daughter to be slapped around each day, until the bully's arm got tired? Probably ! Liberals really do believe that peace is attainable in our lifetime. However, peace only comes when they fold your arms over your chest, and lower you in a six foot grave!

As long as there are people like Mamoud Ahmadinejad, Bassar-al-Assad, Fidel Castro, Putin of Russia, and Hugo Chavez, there will always be a need for good men and women to stand up to them, and be ready to "Put A Boot Up Their Asses."

My heart goes out to Shayla Muldrow, this single mother of three. The judge, identified as John Conrad said it all:

"I wondered if she had thought of the ramifications of turning her daughter into a bully by encouraging her to fight"

There is no evidence that Ms. Muldrow's daughter had a history of fighting. She was only standing up for herself: Something this pinhead judge wouldn't know anything about.

By the way, the bully ended up winning. She got to see Shayla Muldrow hauled off to jail for one year. And this little diliquent can now go back to business as usual, and that is taunting and beating up other young kids.

Nice going, "Your Honor." You should be real proud of yourself for giving stature to this little monster in Tampa, Florida! You are a typical lib: Defending the rights of the enemies of those, whose only wish is, "Peace."

I wonder, would you have told the character in the Andy Griffith Show, that he was creating a bully when he urged Opie to Defend himself against a bully? Just, a little something for you liberals to think about!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/20

"DAN RATHER IS A PATHETIC, SHAMELESS, TIRED OLD MAN"

@ 10:40 AM (25 months, 28 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Why can't people like Dan Rather just go away?

The man certainly has more money than he will ever spend in this lifetime. Rather has to be a pain in the shorts because he's an ego-maniacal maniac. He has to be front and center--or else his life is meaningless. Sitting in his lavish Washington, D.C., home is not enough for Old Dan. No one would see the old buzzard. No one would ever hear that disingenous voice of his again. So, Rather would "rather" be a pain in the ass!

In his pathological mind, being a pain, "Gets Him Attention." He gets even more attention when he files a non-winnable lawsuit against his former employer, CBS News. But, the fact that he will not win this lawsuit will not stop Dan. He has already accomplished part of his mission, "His Name Is On The Lips Of Newscasters And Bloggers Once Again." How pathetic!

If I had Rather's money, my wife and I would be on an African safari. I have had this life long dream of hunting cape buffalo, with my .375 Remington. We would also tour the world, and see all of the wonders that God has given to us. But, Rather is a "liberal." Liberals can not enjoy life, because deep down inside of everyone of these empty people is just that, "Emptiness." I would go a step further and say that most of them are sad or clinically depressed. They are depressed because no one likes them. Hell, they don't even like themselves! This is why they are constantly trying to control the lives of those of us who are, "centered!"

Liberals are only liked when they can do something for another "lecherous liberal." After they are used up, and "kicked to the curb," they become miserable. In order to make the lives of others miserable, they find a cause that can make them a, "royal pain in the ass." As pathetic as this may sound, this makes the liberal feel alive again!

Rather filed a "70-Million Dollar Lawsuit" against CBS. This creep isn't interested in the money. He just simply wants to be considered "Relevant Again." Hey Dan, it won't work. This lawsuit makes you look like the pathetic soul that you are. Rationale individuals are asking, "Why Didn't You File The Lawsuit After You Left CBS? You didn't file the lawsuit, because at the time, your life still had some meaning. Now, you have been reduced to "Doing News On The Internet." I understand that as a liberal, you "Are Mad As Hell." But, hey "Danny Boy," don't blame CBS for your concocting that phoney story regarding the President's National Guard Service. Blame yourself Dan, for being overzealous: For experiecing a feeling of orgasmic proportions at the thought that you, could:

*Determine the outcome of an election

* Bring down President George W. Bush

The only person that you brought down was yourself. Bush's ratings maybe in the toilet, but at least he has ratings. Who the hell is Dan Rather today? I have written in the past that liberals are good at blaming others for their short-comings. Dan Rather is a perfect example. He is blaming CBS for "throwing him under the bus on the Bush story." "Suck It Up Dan!" You were the "Managing Editor" at CBS News. And you know that the Managing Editor at a network is tantamount to being a deity.

Rather is taking "No Prisoners" in this phoney lawsuit. He not only listed CBS, but he has gone after President and CEO, Les Mooves, Viacom Inc, Viacom Chairman, Sumner Redstone and CBS President, Andrew Heyward. Rather says his ruffled feathers could be smoothed out if he is given "20-million in compensatory damages and another 50-million in punitive damages."

Dan Rather is 75-years old, but he is acting like a "Big Baby." He clearly demonstrates that there is a problem in the maturation of one, Dan Rather. This "bloated, fat old man" told the nation that the President shirked some of his duties during his days in the National Guard. He also said that a Commander of the President's "sugar coated his records." To this day, Rather stands by this bogus story. Yet, he has the testes to demand 70-million dollars. Yeah, in his liberal mind, he was the one hurt. He was the one offended. Everyone is against Dan Rather! Are you picking up on some narcissistic traits here? Not to mention, paranoiac behavior. Face it, Dan Rather has a history of delusional behavior. I thought that he would "Crack Up On The Air," before he signed off. Courage, Dan!

I am ashamed to say that this twerp was at one time a U.S. Marine. He had to have been his platoon's, "House Mouse." The "House Mouse" of the platoon is basically a little "Gofer."

Dan Rather is also a "Southerner." Rather comes from the great state of Texas. What happened to him, you ask?

Dan Rather over the years, "Consumed Vats And Vats Of Liberal Kool-Aid."

At this point of his life, Dan Rather should be listed as "Certifiably Crazy." He thus joins the ranks of Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Rodham-Clinton, Diane Feinstein, Russ Feingold, Barbara Boxer, Harry Reid, John Kohn-Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Charles Rangle, "The Grand Keagle," Robert Byrd, Chuck Shumer, Joe Biden, Dick Durbin and Dennis "Damascus" Kuncinich!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (3)

2007/9/19

"THIS GUY IS CLEARLY DISGUSTING"

@ 03:16 PM (25 months, 29 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Just when I thought I had heard it all!

The little tyrant from Iran. Mamoud Ahmadinejad, will be in New York City next week to address the United Nation's General Assembly. Mamoud apparently thought it would be a good idea that while in New York, to drop over to "Ground Zero." No kidding!

Herr Von Ahmadinejad reportedly requested permission to go to ground zero, where he would "lay a wreath in memory of those who died." His request was quickly denied. Police Commissioner, Ray Kelly said while construction work is ongoing, no one would be permitted in the area. That is the politically correct response. I wished that Kelly had said, "who the hell does this little sawed off runt think he is?" How dare this little "Adolph Hitler In The Making," think that he would be allowed to desecrate this sacred area? Alas, Kelly doesn't have the freedom to say what he thinks. It is people like this writer who can say it for him.

Being allowed to enter into our country is enough for me. But, when you factor in this thug having the nerve to request permission to visit ground zero, that's just too much. This guy must think that the entire country is made up of democrats, or socialists. I wonder where he would get such a notion from anyway. Can you say, "The Socialists Press!"

Of course there are people who are willing to fall for this guy's crap. People like Nancy Pelosi, John Kohn-Kerry and Dennis Kucinich. These "Three Stooges" visited Bashar-al-Assad of Syria, and licked his boots. I'm sure if "I'm-A Jihad" asked them to perform the same service on him, they would comply. This guy must think that we are all a bunch of suckers. On the other hand, the little creep was probably trying to get a rise out of the American public. Well, he succeeded!

It was Ahmadinejad's buddies who knocked down the twin towers. Maybe the bastard was planning on laying a wreath in their memory. I don't know about you, but I'm sick of this little animal. He gets away with killing our men and women in Iraq, thanks in large part to his pals in the democrat party, because they have no stomach for war. Now, he wants to go to ground zero.

Thank God someone had the good sense to say no to the "Hitler Of The Middle-East."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (6)

2007/9/18

"O.J. SIMPSON IS NOT A SOCIOPATH--HE IS A CLASSIC NARCISSIST"

@ 06:17 AM (26 months, 21 hours ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Over the past several days, I have heard Psychologists, Psychiatrists, and "Wannabe Mental Health Experts" diagnose O.J. Simpson as a sociopath.

None of their diagnoses can be considered 100% accurate, and that includes what I am about to say. In order to place your trust in a diagnosis, the Psychologist must first perform a face to face interview with the "Identified Patient," and cull data from collateral sources, if any exists. These sources can be family members, progress notes of former therapists, psychological/psychiatric evals, or reports from law enforcement, which includes probation/parole officers. Saying that your diagnosis is "ironclad," just because you have gotten information from television reports, is foolish at best!

O.J. Simpson "Is Not A Sociopath." A sociopath has been described in the literature as someone who can "Walk On Snow, And Never Leave A Foot Print." A sociopath, or antisocial individual is as cunning as they come. Many a therapists, attorney, police officer has been fooled by a sociopath. I recall recently an attorney who helped a prisoner escape from jail. She had falled in love with the guy. I would bet that this guy is a bonafide sociopath!

It is said that the sociopath lacks a conscious. I have worked with a number of these people. One of the first things that they will do, is try to get into the psychologist's good graces. They will heap praise after praise on the therapist. In other words, be equipped with, (1) A shovel, and (2) Long boots. You will be shoveling a lot of manure!

The sociopath does not come to his senses, until he is an old man: And he is burned out, tired of using and abusing people. The sociopath comes to this conclusion, because he is tired of spending years behind bars. My last psychopath(SAME AS SCIOPATH), was a Black man in his late 50's. He told me, "Doc, I've Had Enough: I'm Not Going Back To Jail." This man had spent years in the famed New York State Prison known as, "Attica." He was even there during the riots in the 1970's. A number of prison guards and prisoners were killed when State Police stormed the prison and reclaimed it from inmates.

A sociopath is a vicious animal. In some macabre way, he gets a thrill out of physically hurting people. The thrill is heightened when someone dies. The serial killer, Arthur Shawcross, was a sociopath. Some of the rituals that he performed after killing his victims are too disgusting for me to print in this column. Each and every sociopath that I've worked with has spent years in jail. This is not the case with O.J. Simpson. If Simpson were a genuine sociopath, he would have been in jail long before now. I understand that some of you would say that he would have been in jail for the murders of Nicole Simpson Brown and Ron Goldman, if the jury didn't have their heads up their butts. Keep in mind, this is one case. Yes, it is serious, and I do not in any way wish to come across as playing down the seriousness of Simpson brutally killing these two people. I am only saying that if O.J. Simpson were a true sociopath, he would have screwed up right after being exonerated of the double murders. He would have been doing hard time, years ago.

So, what is the diagnosis that I would ascribe to this idiot? Well, since "Idiot" is not an official DSM-IV diagnosis, I would say that O.J. Simpson is a dyed-in-the wool "Narcissistic Personality Disordered Individual." The Diagnosis and Statistical Manual IV, the book that psycholgists use as a source for diagnosing patients, describes a narcissist as having:

"A pervasive pattern of grandiosity (in fantasy or behavior), need for admiration, and lack of empathy, beginning by early adulthoood and present in a variety of contexts"

The DSM-IV notes that in order for a person to meet the criteria for Narcissistic Personality Disorder, five of the following must be observed:

* Has a grandiose sense of self-importance (e.g., exaggerates achievements and talents, expects to be recognized as superior without commensurate achievements)

* Is preoccupied with fantasies of unlimited success, power, brilliance, beauty or ideal love

* Believes that he or she is "Special" and unique and can only be understood by, or should associate with, other special or high-status people (or institutions)

* requires excessive admiration

* Has a sense of entitlement, i.e., has unreasonable expectations of especially favorable treatmnt or automatic compliance with his or her expectations

* Is interpersonally exploitative, i.e., takes advantage of others to achieve his or her own ends

* Lacks empathy: Is unwilling to recognize or identify with the feelings and needs of others

* Is often envious of others or believes that others are envious of him or her

* Shows arrogant, haughty behaviors of attitudes

The DSM-IV speaks of arrogance and a sense of entitlement. These are the words of O.J. Simpson after he and his goons broke into a Las Vegas hotel room, seeking to recover his alleged stolen sports memorabilia:

"Don't let nobody out this room. Motherf....s! Think you can steal my S... and sell it? You know this s... ain't over with, though, It ain't over with. I'll f... you, f...er"

Lest we forget, O.J. Simpson is a Hall of Fame football player. He was a great running back! No one in their right mind would dispute that. However, his fame brought out the arrogance in this man. Each of the DSM-IV's criteria for Narcissistc Personality Disorder, fits Simpson like "A Glove," no pun intended. This is a man who for years, got whatever he wanted. He was rich beyond any of our imaginations. He could have the woman of his choosing. The evidence is clear that he has had countless women.

O.J. and his hoods broke into that Las Vegas hotel room, because this stupid man is a raging narcissist. He truly believes that he should have what he wants, when he "Demands It."

It would appears that Mr. Simpson will no longer push people around. It looks like the "Juice Will Be Squeezed And Stuck In A Jail For A Long, Long Time."

Narcissist, Narcissist, Thy Name Is "Stupid, aka, Orenthal James Simpson!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (28)

2007/9/16

"SOME SOCIALISTS DEMOCRATS ARE CALLING FOR A DIALOGUE WITH AL QAEDA"

@ 02:09 PM (26 months, 2 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Just when I thought the socialists democrats couldn't get any crazier, word comes that some of these people actually are pushing for direct talks with some members of Al Qaeda!

Unless you have been living under a rock or somewhere off in a cave, Al Qaeda has stated that it has "One Goal." These IslamaFascists want to kill Americans, lots and lots of us. That is what motivates these animals. This is what they live for: To kill Americans, adults, the elderly, children, it doesn't matter, if you are an American, Al Qaeda would love to "Slit Your Throat."

There is nothing complicated about the goals and objectives of Al Qaeda. Yet, there are some "Americans, Socialists Democrats, Who Would Like Our Government To Sit And Talk To These Thugs And Killers." My question is why? My second questions is, what would we talk about? The weather? How much sand is in the Middle-East! What exactly do these crazies from the left want us to talk with these savages about?

P.J. Crowley is a former Bill Clinton lackey. He was on Fox News this weekend. Crowley tried to have it both ways. While he said the U.S. Government should hunt down and kill, Osama Bin Laden. He also said, there are some Al Qaeda groups who aren't as bad as Bin Laden, or some of his confederates. Incredible! Crowley said the purpose of talking to some of these "Good Al Qaeda Guys," would be to "Drive A Wedge" between the different factions. Crowley is like a lot of Americans who have their heads far up their rear ends. The IslamoFascists are not stupid people. Many of them are far more educated than P.J. Crowley!

But, this is the problem with socialists democrats. They think that they haver cornered the market on intelligence. This is why they end up with egg on their faces so often. When you mix "Arrogance With Stupidity," you have a recipe for disaster. But, the arrogant individual doesn't see it that way. He truly feels that he is brillant, and everyone else is always a step or two behind him. This despite the fact that he leaves behind, failure after failure.

America, this type of arrogant thinking will end of getting millions of us killed. The reason why I say this is because nitwits like this P.J. Crowley character, is so full of himself and his so-called brilliant mind. Remember, it was during Bill Clinton's watch that Osama Bin Laden escaped capture: Or being killed. It was also during Bill Clinton's watch that 09/11 was hatched by the IslamoFascists. Please, do not ever forget this!

Brigette Gabriel, a Lebanese born woman, who now resides in the United States, is the author of the book, "Because They Hate." In her book, she details how her country extended a welcome hand to Arabs, and in return, the Arabs took over Lebannon. Gabriel warns that all of the signs that preceded the IslamoFascists taking over her country, can be seen in America today. She says public apathy is why her country fell into the hands of the IslamoFascists. She said her people failed to read the writing on the wall. This despite the fact that the IslamoFascists told her countrymen what they planned to do. Is this starting to sound familiar? Well, it should, because the IslamoFascists have told us repeatedly what there plans are for Americans.

Yet, we have dunderheads like this moron P.J. Crowley urging Americans to try to "Split" Al Qaeda. These people unlike millions of Americans, are "United." They, unlike millions of Americans, are dedicated to one common cause, the eradication of "All" Israelis and Americans. Nonetheless, we have the "Peaceniks" amongst us, encouraging us to follow their insane plans.

Morons like P.J. need to understand that this is not World War II. This is not Vietnam, although many of his ilk are trying to convince Americans that it is Deja Vu, once again. The IslamoFascists are an amalgam. They have a nexus with each faction. Do not listen to fools like this Clinton lackey!

If P.J. Crowley truly believes that there are some "Good Al Qaeda Guys" out there, I have but one question for him. Would he be willing to stick his hand into the hole of a "Diamondback Rattle Snake?" No, then please do not ask me to "Play With Thugs And Killers."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (8)

2007/9/15

"HILLARY CLINTON--PASSING THE BUCK ONCE AGAIN"

@ 04:05 PM (26 months, 3 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Is there anything that Hillary Rodham-Clinton can accept responsibility for?

Yes, only the positive things in her life. However, people judge you by your entire character. In other words, the public will judge your positive attributes: And the negative things about you as well. What the American people despise are people who can not take personal resonsibility for doing something wrong. If you want to raise the hackles on the back of the necks of Americans, become a slimeball weasel, and try and blame someone else for your screw ups. This is exactly what Hillary Rodham-Clinton has done in the Norman Hsu donation scandal affair!

Hsu is a "Safe Object," so Hillary feels comfortable in blaming him for "accepting nearly a million dollars in campaign contributions." Hsu is a safe object because he can not fight back. After all, the man is in a hospital in Colorado, for unexplained health reasons. So, Hillary does what Hillary does best, "Kick Someone When They Are Down."

Hillary campaign staff is whining that it was the job of the Secret Service to "Vet Hsu." Of course, Hillary's people are saying the Secret Service "Blew It." Forever the finger pointers. Forever the "pristine character." This is a disgusting woman, who knows how to deflect blame, by redirecting it toward someone else. No wonder the Secret Service never liked the woman when she was the "First Lady." It is said that she thought she was the "Queen Of America, Not The First Lady." Hillary reportedly treated the Secret Service like dog poop! And, she is back up to her old tricks, America.

Clinton Mouthpiece, Howard Wolfson reportedly said the Secret Service did not "Vet Hsu." Wolfson who has apparently learned well while sitting at the feet of the Clintons, said the Secret Service didn't do its job because Mrs. Clinton isn't "The First Lady Anymore."

Ted Deeds, the chief operating officer of the Law Enforcement Alliance of America disagrees:

"There are all kinds of levels of background checks that would make law enforcement raise their eyebrows. I'm sure the Secret Service knew he(Norman Hsu) was a felon fugitive. What a scandal it would be if they didn't warn a president or first lady they were standing next to a convicted felon"

Deeds added in these words, "It is standard operating procedure to check the Social Security number and date of birth of anyone who is going to be in a room with the president or first lady." So the question is, did Hillary know that Hsu was on the lamb? Was she that obsessed with his huge contribution that she took her eye off of the ball? Once again, Ted Deeds:

If the secret Service did not do the basis due-diligence check, then the questions are even more pointed. Who ordered them not to do it and why? Was the Clinton campaign, and by extension the Democrat fundraising machines, so focused on money that they would violate basic security protocol?"

Hsu isn't the only big time donor who coughed up a large sum of money to Mrs. Clinton's campaign: And who is now in trouble with the law. Abdul Rehman Jinah, a pakistani immigrant, and now a Los Angles businessman is currently on the lamb. Police have charged him with moving $30,000 in illegal contributions to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign. Jinah turned up missing after a federal grand jury indicted him on charges of violating federal election laws.

Jihan is also seen in pictures with Clinton. Did he too escape the vetting process by the Secret Service? It is time for Mrs. Clinton to come clean. It is also time for conservatives and republicans to get up off their duffs and start demanding answers from Hillary Clinton. We know that the socialists press will not ask he tough questions of Mrs. Clinton:Because the press is in the tank for this two faced woman. So, the onus falls on conservatives and republicans.

This is a "Major Scandal" that will not go awayany time soon. Hillary Clinton can not get away with saying:

* I didn't know

* I will give the donated money away to one of my favorite charities

This sounds like a criminal offense to this writer. Conservatives and republicans should be screaming at the top of their lungs for the president to appoint "A Special Prosecutor To Investigate Hillary Clinton."

We know that if this were a republican two things would happen, (A) The media would be treating this story like a piece of "raw meat," and (B) The media would be "Outraged, And Demanding Answers" from the republican. Since it is Hillary Clinton, the socialists press is treating this story like any puff piece that they do on Mrs. Clinton.

However, this is one time that Mrs. Clinton will not be able to use her usual lame excuse, "I Didn't Know." It is time to pay the piper, Hillary. This is one time, "The Weasel Will Not Be Allowed To Weasel!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/14

"THE NEW YORK TIMES--NO LONGER HIDING ITS POLITICAL BIAS"

@ 11:38 AM (26 months, 4 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Okay, now that the New York Times has come out and made it official, that it is a political wing of the democrat party, I think that it is time for the government to reassess whether the Times should be accorded the title of a, "Newspaper."

Mr. Webster describes a newspaper in this manner:

"A publication, us. issued daily or weekly and containing news, comment, features, and advertising"

The First Amendment of the United States Constitution reads as follows:

"Congress shall make no law respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people peaceably to petition the government for a redress of grevances"

Before looking deeper into the Framers writing of the First Amendment, let's dissect what the definition of a newspaper is. First, Webster says a newspaper is a vehicle for disseminating news. Although clearly bias, the New York Times meets this criteria. Secondly, Mr. Webster says a newspaper writes comments(editorials) and do feature stories. I have no problem here with the Times, especially in the area of editorials, although it is clear the Times is slanted more in favor of the socialists democrats. It is the advertising part of the definition of what a newspaper is supposed to do, that I have a problem with the New York Times.

The Times not only ran that disgusting ad put together by the socialists over at Moveon.Org, it is widely reported that the New York Times gave Moveon "A Cut Rate." The New York Post is reporting that the Times normally receives "$116,000" for a full-page black and white ad on a Monday. Moveon.Org according to the Post, only paid "65,000" to run its despicable ad, calling General David Petraeus, "General Betray Us." The Post says a spokesman from none other than Moveon, quoted the price to one of its reporters. Busted!

Now that the New York Times has been caught "In Bed With The Democrats," and their slimey friends at Moveon.Org, the question that begs to be answered is when will the Times come out and say they are now changing the name of their paper to "The New York Pravda?" Pravda was the old "Communist Russian Newspaper" that was a mouthpiece for the politiburo, which was the heart and soul of communist Russia!

The New York Times can never be taken seriously as a newspaper. They crossed the line by jumping into bed with Moveon and the democrats. Their reputation and believability has been forever irreparably damaged!

On the issue of the First Amendment! The Framers said that "Congress shall make no laws respecting the establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press." As I see it, the Times forfeited this freedom as a legitimate newspaper, when it crossed the line by giving Moveon.Org a cut rate. Never mind the abhorrent ad. When the New York Times "Exposed" itself as being nothing more than a harlot for the socialists democrats and Moveone.Org, it lost its legitimacy to be called a "Newspaper." The Times would do well to now call itself a, "Magazine." A magazine can get away with writing "Dribble And Running Disgusting Ads."

It is my belief that Americans will never look at the New York Times the way that they once saw this paper. The Times has "Outed Itself." And henceforth, its bloviating, and pontificating against the President will be seen as just another hatchet job, by a bunch of left wing zealots: determined to change this country into their warped image!

The New York Times was impulsive in its hatred of the President to allow Moveon.Org to run an ad, at a cut rate price. I opined in my first book the following words, "Impulsivity Is The Cousin Of Stupidity. Think!

The New York Times is full of arrogant blowhards. One would think they would hang their heads in shame. But, not these arrogant, cocky bastards. They were back at it again today. When you are a narcissist, you truly feel that the world revolves around you. The New York Times is no different. The narcissists can not hear criticism. The narcissist can only hear "The Glowing Words Of Others, Directed Toward The Narcissist."

The narcissists at the New York Times wrote in an editorial piece that said, the President "Had Failed In Iraq." These pompous jackasses also pooh-poohed the President's speech on Iraq, where he talked about "a measure of success, we are seeing in Iraq, and we can begin seeing some troops come home."

The "New York Pravda" accused the President of "putting up smokescreens." And "Pravda West" declared:

"Mr. Bush has no strategy to end his disastrous war and no strategy for containing the chaos he unleashed"

A suggestion for the New York Times, AKA, The New York Pravda. "Shut Your Piehole." You have lost "All Credibility With The American People."

You are attempting to protray yourselves as a legitimate newspaper. The American public isn't buying this baloney any longer.

The New York Times should tag each political story that it does from now on with these words, "Not Paid For By Our Friends, The Democrats, Moveon.Org, And Other Sleazy Socialists Groups. We Did This For Nothing!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (10)

2007/9/13

"MEMO TO SENATOR HILLARY RODHAM-CLINTON--JUDGE NOT--SO YE WILL NOT BE JUDGED"

@ 10:24 AM (26 months, 5 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Hillary Clinton reportedly has found faith. She won't say if it's "Faith Hill, or Faith Evans."

I'm feeling benevolent at the moment, therefore, I'll give the fat hypocrite the benefit of the doubt! Let's say Hillary is a "Christian." I know it is a hard concept to conceive. But, for the sake of argument, bear with me. If Hillary is a Christian, she, being "the smartest woman in the world," should know that the good book warns against judging others!

Hillary went a step beyond judging Four-Star General, David Petraeus this week. She called the man a "Liar," when he presented his report to the Senate on the Iraq War. We can not lose this war fast enough for this woman. Although she is on record as saying the surge has worked. She is also on record calling for "The Redeployment Of Our Troops" from the Iraqi theatre. In other words, she advocates, "Cutting And Running."

To say that Hillary was hard on General Petraeus would be a major understatement. This from a woman who is no stranger to scandal after scandal. She currently has a huge scandal on her hands. One would think that Hillary would lay low. But, she has the socialists press out there running interference for her on the Norman Hsu donation scandal. Hsu is the man who ponied up nearly a "Million Dollars" for the Clinton presidential campaign. Yet, she claims she has no knowledge of Hsu. When you give that must money to a campaign, the candidate best damn well know who you are, because they know at some point, "The Political Favors Will Be Called In."

Let's face it, Norman Hsu wasn't giving away all of that cash, because he is a nice guy. Hsu ws setting the table for a big payoff, somewhere down the road. But, on the way to the big payoff, this slimeball got caught. Hillary says she doesn't know who Hsu is. Well, the American people should be asking two questions:

* Why didn't Clinton's staffers "Goggle" this guy's name after being the recipient of so much money?

* How is it, Hillary Clinton always "Dummy's Up" when the heat is on?

This isn't the first time that this woman has feigned "Stupidity" after being cornered. She can tell General Petraeus that he is lying about the surge, but she expects the American people to believe her when she says she doesn't know who Norman Hsu is. I ask you, is this the type of person that you want as "Your Next President?" Do I believe Mrs. Clinton's lame excuse, that she doesn't know Norman Hsu? Do you believe there is ocean front property in Arizona? If so, I've got some to sell you. Of course, this woman knows who Norman Hsu is!

Hillary should know that people "Who Live In Glass Houses, Shouldn't Throw Stones." But, like most democrats, this is an arrogant woman, who feels she is above being judged. Yes, it is okay for her to judge others, but no one should ever question the veracity of one, Hillary Rodham-Clinton.

The socialists press knows that this Norman Hsu story is one hot potato! Yet, they are downplaying its importance. This is why it is critical, that "Every American" learn how to think, read and listen in a critical manner. Never in the annals of American history has this caveat been more apropos. Those of us who call ourselves Conservatives are surrounded by sharks. We are not only fighting a "Culture War," we are fighting for the "Very Soul Of America." There are evil people out there who mean us great harm! They want to shove their ideology down the throats of every good and decent American. They despise "Individualism." What they want are meek, robots. Incapable of thought.

In the meantime, the Associated Press is reporting that Norman Hsu mailed a suicide note last week to a legal group. The AP says the letter, which was written in a coherent manner, was sent to the Innocence Project, which is located in New York City. The letter reached its destination as Hsu was traveling across the country by train, in what some are calling a "legal odyssey" stemming from his 1991 conviction of grand theft. Authorities put out an "All Points Bullentin" for Hsu after he failed to appear for a bail hearing in California. Hsu was taken off an Amtrak train and driven to a Colorado hospital for treatment of an undisclosed illness.

Hsu gave Hillary so much money that he was given the title of "Hillraiser." Clinton promised to return the $850,000 in contributions.

The way I see it folks, "I'm From Virginia," "Hillary Clinton will have to prove it to men, when she says she will return nearly a million dollars.

The socialists press is carrying this fat woman's water. If this had been Fred Thompson, or Mitt Romney, the press would have torpedoed their campaigns by now.

Hillary Clinton should not be allowed to get away once again by declaring, "I Didn't Know." She has used this "Childess" excuse once, "Too Often."

It is time for Mrs. Clinton to "Stop Lying."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

DENNIS "DAMASCUS" KUCINICH BLASTS HIS OWN COUNTRY ON SYRIAN TELEVISION

@ 04:14 AM (26 months, 5 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Dennis Kucinich is a "National Disgrace!"

I am laboring under no illusions that my comments will in any way change the warped thinking of this tiny, little man, who has the unmitigated gall to say he wants to be the next President of these United States.

Kucinich is the lastest socialists democrat to "bow and scrape" before the terrorist leader of Syria, Bashar Assad. If you will recall, Nancy Pelosi make a complete fool of herself when she met with this butcher, earlier this year. She claimed to have taken a message to Assad from the Prime Minister of Israel. The Israelis quickly shot down this airdome's claim that the P.M. of Israel was ready to sit down and discuss peace with Assad! Pelosi had egg all over her botox face, but you wouldn't know it from the socialists press, who gave only token attention to this major diplomatic blunder!

Kucinich, with hat in hand, told Assad that he wouldn't go to Iraq because, "he considers the U.S. Military deployment there illegal." Quite frankly, I don't blame Kucinich for avoiding Iraq. Our troops would probably "put a hurt on this little dwarf, if he showed his face on a Baghdad street." Speaking as if he were the king of "Siam,' this disgusting, pompous jackass declared:

"I feel the United States is engaging in an illegal occupation..I don't want to bless that occupation with my presence. I will not do it"

Hey Dennis, great job! You have just bolstered the morale of Al Qaeda and the Taliban, fighting in Afghanistan. At the same time, you have demoralized our troops. You arrogant, little pea-brain idiot. Your words will be played throughout the Middle-East. You have now become the "Jane Fonda" of the war in Iraq. Congratulations, "Traitor."

I have no problem with an American dissenting against this war, while speaking at home. However, to go to a country which has been called a "Terrorist Nation" by our goverment, and rail against our troops, well, that does it! Kucinich is the face of the "New Democrat Party." So, do not be fooled by all of this talk that there are "Moderate Democrats." The wackos on the far left have hijacked the democrat party: And people like Kucinich and Pelosi pay homage to these nuts when they go to places like Syria, and denounce our country.

Not only is Syria a "State Sponsor Of Terrorism," this country is responsible for allowing suicide bombers to cross their borders and into Iraq, where they "Kill American Troops." What part of this eludes the Dennis Kucinich's of the world? Does he hate this country that much, that he would sit like a puppet for Assad, and speak bitterly about his own country?

Kucinich charged the Bush administration with "Destabilizing The Middle-East." And the little "Lap Dog" said that Assad "was receptive to his ideas of strength through peace." Yeah, right! This guy Assad is playing members of the democrat party like a "Stratovarius Violin." I'm trying to figure out what are members of the democrat party getting by embarassing themselves by groveling before this despot? And to think, these people have to look at themselves in the mirror each morning.

While Kucinich was bashing "America," he was busily "Sucking Up To Assad." He praised Assad for "taking in more than a milllion Iraqi refugees." Hey nitwit! This killer helped to displace the Iraqis.

Kucinich also took a swipe at Israel. He vowed to call on U.S. Secretary General, Ban Ki-Moon to look into the "dire conditions in southern Lebanon." In particular, this little interloper said that he was concerned over the Israeli cluster bombs which were left over from the recent war with Hamas. Kucinich maintains the bombs have killed some 30-individuals and injured at least 200 others.

Dennis Kucinich, the "Self-Appointed Roving Ambassador," and overall pain in the "Keister", and today, a "National Disgrace."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM M

2007/9/12

"DEMOCRATS SHOULD SEEK TO COURT-MARTIAL GENERAL PETRAEUS"

@ 01:48 PM (26 months, 6 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

First of all, allow me to state that General David Petraeus has much more forbearance than I do!

This honorable man sat and listened, as a bunch of "Anti-Americans" called him a "Liar," this week! Where I come from, "Those Are Fighting Words." A man has his word: And when you question that, he is left with no alternative but to defend his honor. Of course, the cowardly democrats who called this Four-Star General a liar, wouldn't last five seconds in an empty room with him. But, such is the state of our country today! The people who established this country must be turning over in the graves, as I type this column!

Of all people, Dick Durbin of Illinois, accused the General of "Carefully manipulating the statistics" on the suge in Iraq. Not to be outdone, Senate Majority Leader, and "Chief Democrat Weasel," Harry Reid said that Petraeus, "Has Made A Number Of Statements Over The Years That have Not Proven To Be Factual." The socialist group, Moveon.Org took out a full page ad in the socialists' favorite newspaper, The New York Times, and called this honorable man, "General Betray Us." More on this despicable ad, later in this write up!

The democrat party which is now taking its marching orders from none other than Osama Bin Laden, are furious at General Petraeus. They are angry because Petraeus did not tell them what they wanted to hear, and that is, the surge was a complete, utter failure. This week, the democrat party showed the American people that they are without shame; And there is no level that they will not stoop to. Instead of throwing their support behind our men and women in uniform, these cowards have sided with OBL. Like Osama Bin Laden, the democrats want out troops out of Iraq, "NOW."

The democrats have also shown us who else is pulling their strings. His name is George Soros, the leader of the repugnant group known as Moveon.Org. When George Soros and company speaks, the democrats "Snap To, And Listen." I don't know about you, but to sit and watch these bunch of pathetic, meely mouth cowards attempt to cut down one of the most brilliant Generals in military history, well, it got my blood to boil. It's like I said, General David Petraeus has much more restraint than I do! He sat in military poise--and listened "Respectfully," while this group of hyenas accused him of "Letting George Bush Write His Report For Him." Now, that takes nerve, even for these spineless democrats.

In the face of sitting in a room full of "Unpatriotic Cowards," General Petraeus was "cool under fire." He didn't try to paint a glowing picture of Iraq. In fact, General Petraeus said, "the situation in Iraq remains complex, difficult, and sometimes downright frustrating." And he added:

"Achieving our objectives will be neither quick nor easy. But, I believe that achieving them is still possible, and a premature withdrawal would likely have devastating consequences"

Democrats are so hell-bent on us losing this war, the ramification of this loss be damned! They are playing with the American people like we are nothing but political pawns. They want to use the war against the next GOP presidential nominee. However, if the war is succeeding, and it is at this point, these poor excuses for patriots, have nothing else to carp about to the American people!

If General Petraeus came to Capitol Hill and "Lied" to people like Dick Durbin and Harry Reid, I would suggest that the Congress urge the Commander In-Chief, and that man's name is George W. Bush, to start "Court-Martial Proceedings, Immediately." Democrats have their pick of four different options:

* Summary Court Martial

* Special Court Martial

* Special Court Martial empowered to adjudge a bad conduct discharge

* General Court Martial

There you have it democrats, "Pick Your Poison." Now is the time to either "Put Up, Or Shut Up." You have tried to impugn this man's good name, so here is your chance to complete the job, and bury the General! The democrats lack the stones to bring up the subject of, "Court Martial." Sigmund Freud called what the democrats have attempted to do, "Projecting."

A wife who accuses her husband of infidelity, without a shred of evidence, is probably the one who is being unfaithful. A person who goes on a witch-hunt, calling another person a liar, and lacks any evidence of same, is probably, "The Liar." People who engage in projecting are simply trying remove the spotlight from their bad behavior. It's their guilt(Unconscious) that causes them to engage in this defense mechanism!

No, General Petraeus is not the liar. It is the democrats, with the help of the socialists media who have been lying to the American people. Remember, these people are still fighting "The 2000 Election!" They still believe George Bush "Stole The Election."

In the meantime, only a handful of democrats have had the common decency to step up and denounce that sickening ad in the New York Times, which called General Petraeus, "General Betray Us." I was surprised to hear that Senators Joe Biden and John Kohn-Kerry came out against the ad. The rest of the shameless democrats know who their "Masters Are." So, they shuffle their feet, and bow their heads to George Soros and his socialists group, Moveone.org. What a bunch of pathetic, disgraceful little people!

Senator Hillary Clinton wants to be your next president. Guess what? She refused to denounced this outrageous ad! Instead, this boot licker said she agreed with Moveon.Org's "central point." She said she questioned if the General's views on the success of the war was believable. In other words, This woman called the General "A Liar." Fancy that!This is the same woman who has "Selective Amnesia" when she is cornered with a controversy. She claims she has no knowledge of who Norman Hsu is. Hsu is the Asian man who gave the Clinton campaign almost a million dollars in contributions. Yet, she wants us to believe she doesn't know the guy. And she has the gall to call General Petraeus "A Liar." Hillary Clinton is "Projecting."

The "Breck Girl," John Edwards attempted to play King Solomon. He said he "Honored General Petraeus' Service And Patriotism." Are you feeling that a "But" is coming? You're right! The "Breck Girl" said the General is dead wrong if he believes the American people or Congress, "Should Give President Bush's Failed Iraq Strategy More time."

Keep in mind, the "Breck Girl" says there "IS NO WAR ON TERROR." He said earlier this year, that was "only a bumper stick slogan."

No America, you are not having a "National Nightmare." What you have been witnessing from the democrat party this week actually took place. And yes, they are taking their marching orders from Osama Bin Laden and other dispicable characters, all in the name of gaining/maintaining political power!

Oh, your safety? Do you really believe that the democrat party gives a damn about you or your family? The democrats only answer to people like George Soros, the socialists press, OBL, Code Pink, and other socialists/fascists groups!

You are an irritant to the democrats! That is, "If you Think!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH'

Permalink |

2007/9/11

"ANGER MANAGEMENT AND PARENTING CLASSES, DO NOT WORK"

@ 03:20 PM (26 months, 7 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Allow me the chance to let you in on a well guarded secret! Anger management and parenting classes are colossal failures in this country! There are a number of programs funded by federal and local governments, that are in essence, "Useless."

The purpose of today's column is to focus on just two of these inane, but yet, exhorbitant programs!

I can just hear the exhalation of air out there. However, to be honest, both of these entities are "Liberal Money Making, Cash Cows!" And believe me, they soak the American taxpayer to the tune of billions of dollars every year. They are nothing but, feel good programs. It is as simple as that. If they were proven programs, we would have the data available that would support anger management and parenting classes. However, there is no such animal. Yet, agencies are funded year after year after year, at our expense. The same thing goes for our penal institutions.

Here is how I have arrived at my conclusion regarding both of these two failed programs. First, there is no data available,, longitudinal or cross sectional, that would support the continuance of either program. Secondly, to not include psychotherapy in either anger management or parenting classes, is a prelude to failure. People who are mandated to either program are dealing with what psychologists call, characterological problems. Simply stated, these people have issues that are part and parcel of their character. Are you with me thus far? If you do not deal with the character issues, the patient will continue to be saddled with his/her baggage. So, what are some of the character issues that patients have to deal with?

In the case of anger management, the origin of the patient's anger could stem from coming from an abusive home. If the patient is a male, he could have been abused by a female member of the family. As he grows up, the patient internalizes his hatred for "All Females." So, it is not surprising that this person displays violence in relationships with females. He is not angry at that one individual whom he is presently involved with, he is angry at the person(Female) who abused him. The person who is in the relationship with this person is thus treated as a surrogate. In other words, she is the receiver of the physical and emotional abuse, that he would like to visit upon the original perpetrator!

Giving this person's "hand outs" in an anger management class; And asking him to rate his anger at the moment, on a scale of 0-10: Or showing him faces on a hand out and asking him to describe his feelings, is a waste of time. This person is in need of intensive psychotherapy, which would include not only individual work, but group psychotherapy:And psychopharmacology(psychiatric medicine) as well.

If the patient has intense anger at another racial group, because he watched his family being murdered by a group of so-called "White or Black Supremacists," I must state again, "Anger Management" classes alone, will not help. Providing this person with anger management classes, minus the concomitant psychotherapy, etc, is tatamount to giving a cancer patient "Vasoline" and telling him to go home. We know what the prognosis will be. So why is society attempting to fix a cancerous problem, namely "Intense Anger," using a band-aid approach? I believe we can look to two reasons, (A) Arrogance, and (B) Mental health experts not being honest with judges, or employers who mandate these people to anger management classes.

Mental health agencies are a "Multi-Billion Dollar" industry in this country. Like most businesses, these agencies are looking to "Make A Quick Buck." Most of the therapists that I have worked with in community mental health agencies have good intentions. It is the higher ups who wouldn't know psychotherapy from a hole in the wall. Yes, I know some of these people are psychiatrists and psychologists. My response, so what? Because you can pass a test does not mean that you are competent. There is a thing called "False Positive." In this case, the term is used when someone passes a licensing exam, but turns out to be an incompetent boob. That is what I mean by "False Positive."

If you are in need of parenting classes, chances are you shouldn't have had children in the first place. Parenting classes alone can not change an abusive woman into "Mary Poppins." When I was released from the Marine Corps, my parents lived in an apartment building in Brooklyn, New York. There was this Puerto Rican woman on the 2nd floor. She was a very sexy woman. As with any good Marine, I was thinking from my waist down!

I stopped thinking in this manner when I learned that she had burned her young son's hands on the kitchen stove. The woman said she was trying to teach him a lesson that, "Playing With Matches" could start a fire. Now really, do you think that parenting classes would have helped this pathetic woman, or anyone like her?

America is awashed in useless programs. And we the taxpayers get to fund them. What would I do if I could stop the funding of these programs? I would cut off funding to them ASAP. The funding would stop until it could be proven with credible studies that taxpayers are not getting hosed.

Alas, I live in the real world and I understand that these liberal programs will never end. The genie is out of the bottle. Good luck in trying to cram her expensive, "Fat Derriere" back into this bottle!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/10

"YET ANOTHER STORY THE SOCIALISTS PRESS TRIED TO HIDE FROM YOU"

@ 02:36 PM (26 months, 8 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

We know that the democrats and the socialists press are friends of IslamoFascists!

The socialists press is also determined to hide certain stories from Americans. Take for example, the "Hundreds Of Muslims" who marched in New York City at the "22nd annual American Muslim Day Parade." Did you read about this story in your local paper? Did you hear about this story on one of the so-called "Big Three Networks? Did you hear about it on local television? I rather doubt it. The reason why is because the socialists press "did not want you to know about this story." They want to continue to paint a picture that all of those who practice Islam, "Are Peaceful."

The marchers were met by about twenty protesters, who shouted anti-Muslim slogans. The protesters were kept away from the marchers by a large police presence! A member of the American Muslim Day Parade, a fellow by the name of, Dr. Hafiz Ur Rehman, who also happens to be a pediatrician from Bay Shore, Long Island had this to say:

"We are law abiding citizens, and we want the people of New York to know that Muslims are part and parcel of the landscape. The motto of this parade is that Islam holds human dignity high. And that is what we want to demonstrate"

A touching scene took place before the parade got underway. The parade participants placed blue plastic ground coverings on the ground and "prayed." By the way, their women were told "to get in back of the men." How is that for equality? Maybe these folks aren't like Osama Bin Laden, but their views of a "woman's place, is the same." Yet, Muslims couldn't find better friends than socialists democrats and their equally socialists friends in the newsmedia!

It should be noted that the parade marchers carried banners representing Afghanistan, Banladeshi and Indonesian community groups. There is no mention of any of the marchers carrying "An American Flag." And these people wonder why they have formented so much hatred toward Muslims here and around the world. What this country does not need is another group standing in the public square, and "pledging allegiance to their Muslim homeland." The parade participants say they are Americans, however, you couldn't prove that to those who came to protest their antics.

Joe Kaufman, of Coral Springs, Florida lead the protesters. Kaufman said he was privvy to information that showed the parade organizers support the Palestinian terrorist group, Hamas. Kaufman's group attempted to link the parade's marchers to the terrorists attack on the U.S. on September 11th, 2001. His group shouted, "God bless America, and no more 9/11."

Tuesday will mark the "Sixth Anniversary" of the cowardly IslamoFascists attack on America. Any person in his or her right mind would have to ask, "Why Did The Muslim Parade Organizers Decide To Hold Their Parade Only A Few Days BeFore This Solemn Event?" Don't this idiots realize that the wound of that infamous day is still "Open," or is it that just don't give a rat's behind?

It is people like this nitwit, Dr. Hafiz Ur Rehman, who continues to help polarize Muslims in this country from everyday Americans. He is like Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton. Instead of helping Muslims asssimilate within the broader base of American society, his actions and the actions of those following dutifully behind him, only widens the divide that we are presently witnessing!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/9

"WHY DO MUSLIMS THINK THEIR RELIGION IS OFF LIMITS TO SATIRISTS?"

@ 02:59 PM (26 months, 9 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Christianity has been made the butt of myriad jokes by individuals since time immemorial!

Some of the stuff that I've seen has made me uncomfortable, yet, these people who find Christianity "funny," apparently have the right to achieve a comical orgasm, because of the 1st Amendment. These same people who insult millions of Christians worldwide, wouldn't have the nerve to do that to the religion of Islam!

They understand that some lunatic is waiting in the wings with a rusty knife, ready to decapitate, or disembowel them. So, they pick on Christianity, knowing full well that no one from this religious community would ever think of killing them because they denigrate their faith. Our faith teaches us that "Vengeance" belongs to God, not to some mere mortal! For many of the people who practice Islam, they feel that it is their duty to exact vengenance in the name of "Allah."

A Swedish newspaper has decided to push the envelope in regards to poking fun at Islam. The paper released a sketch "of the head of Mohammed on the body of a dog." To say this did not go over well in the Islamic world would be a major understatement! Pakistan immediately came out and condemned the cartoon, calling it "offensive and blasphemous to their Holy Prophet!" A Swedish diplomat was ordered to the Pakistan Ministry's office, and was told in no uncertain terms that "the sketch had caused grave affront to the religious sentiments of Muslims."

The Pakistani Ministry also had this to say:

"Regrettably, the tendency among some Europeans to mix the freedom of expression with an outright and deliberate insult to 1.3 Billion Muslims in the world is on the rise"

The Swedish diplomat reportedly groveled at the feet of the Pakistani Ministry. This guy according to reports, bent over backwards apologizing "for any hurt feelings the publication may have caused." My question is why did the Swedish diplomat feel it necessary to apologize to Pakistan or to Muslims in general? It wasn't the diplomat who placed the sketch in the Swedish newspaper!

Instead of standing up to these Middle-Eastern bullies, the government of Stockholm has created quite a gulf between the government and the newspaper, Nerikes Allehanda. The paper said the sketch by artist Lars Vilks, was printed in order to "illustrate an editorial on freedom of expression." Something those in the Muslim world woudn't know anything about. They are so used to bullying and threatening the lives of others, if they don't dot their "I's" and cross their "T's" the way that the bullies do!

If you will recall, several months ago, a Danish newspaper printed caricatures of Mohammed. This set off a world wide tulmult! Thus far, the "natives" are quiet in the wake of the publication of the Swedish sketch of Mohammed. That is not to say that all hell couldn't break out, once these fanatics get word of what the Swedish newspaper did to their "beloved Mohammed." It makes me wonder, why can't Mohammed handle these "infidels" himself? Somethings really do make one goes, hmmmm...

After the Danish newspaper's cartoon was reproduced in other European newspapers, death threats were made; some people were killed: and Danish products were boycotted in the Middle-East. And get this, the Organization of the Islamic Conference is hard at work to force international institutions to:

* Outlaw the "defamation of prophets

* Combat Islamophobia

I kid you not! Well, the OIC doesn't have to worry about the girlie men in this country "defaming the prophets." Hell, they didn't even have the testes to reprint the Danish cartoon. The New York Times which loves bullying the Bush administration; and telling outright lies to the American people in their "reportage," said it would not print the cartoon, because words would "suffice." Translation, the New York Times are a bunch of cowards, except when it comes to bashing their own country, and the values of mainstream Americans!

I have a recommendation for the OIC. How about joining us in combatting "IslamoFascism?" How about denouncing that little tyrant in Tehran, who is pushing the world toward World War III? It is interesting, these "devout Muslims." They go absolutely bannanas when someone makes a little joke about their religion. But, their mouths are eerily silent when it comes to speaking out against the Islamofascists, who have murdered thousands upon thousands of their "Fellow Muslims."

There's nothing like being hypocritical, eh guys?

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/8

"THE SOCIALIST MEDIA TRIED TO HIDE THIS STORY ON YOU"

@ 02:58 PM (26 months, 10 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

It is a whole different ballgame in journalism today...

Americans get their news from a number of different sources. There are some of us who are former broadcast/print journalists. Therefore, we know the drill! We also know good "copy" when we see it. And we have the ability to write said copy keeping within the holy grail of journalism, namely the "5W's." Most reporters today couldn't explain to you the "5W's,' which are:

* Who

* What

* When

* Where

* Why

There is a fifth component to this holy grail of journalism, and that is, "How." Most of today's reporters are too busy either "Flashing Their Thighs On Television," or, "Injecting Their Opinion Into A Story. As a heterosexual male, I'm comfortable with the "Thigh Thing." What healthy American male doesn't stay glued to his television set whenever, Fox's "Laurie Dhue" is on the air? To you "Feminazis" out there, relax. This isn't male chavaunism. This simply shows that there is indeed a difference between a man and a woman. And I for one say, "Thank God." But, the narcissism thing can be left at home, because I don't care to hear the opinion of most of these airheads!

Charles Rust-Tierney was at one time, "The President of Virginia's ACLU's chapter. That is until Rust-Tierney got caught with "Graphic And Violent Child Pornography." This story has virtually been removed from the socialists press' radar screen. The reason being, " Tierney Is One Of Them."

The socialists press tried to hide this story, opting to focus on stories that are anti-Bush, or, anti-American. However, because of the "New Journalists, Now On The World Wide Web," the socialists in this country can no longer dictate what Americans get to read.

This creep, Charles Rust-Tierney, was sentenced to eight years in Federal pen for his sick, pathetic behavior on Friday. He has been in jail since being arrested earlier this year. To demonstrate the seriousness of the charges this sicko admitted to, two different judges in pretrial hearings, turned down his request for bail. Magistrate Theresa Buchanan said some of the material that Rust-Tierney collected was a lengthy video, which featured the "Sexual Torture Of Children, accompanied by a song performed by the band, Nine Inch Nails.

This Charles Rust-Tierney is the same character who argued before the Loudoun County Library Board, opposing Internet filters on computers at this facility. Now, we know why this swine was against Internet filters. I nearly regurgitated when I read a quote from this guy, during his argument before the Library Board. He said that:

"Individuals will continue to behave responsibly and appropriately while in the library, so therefore the default should be maximum, unrestricted access to the Internet"

Wow! This is simply mind boggling! Something else that is mind boggling is the fact that Rust-Tierney worked as a youth league sports coach in Virginia. Court records revealed that he downloaded his child pornography, "on a computer in his son's bedroom at home." A U.S. Magistrate said of the child pornography, it is:

"The most perverted and nauseating and sickening type of child pornography, I have ever seen"

I have always questioned "Whose Side The ACLU Is On?" Now, we know. Cris Clapp of the group, "Enough Is Enough," had this to say on the matter, at the time of Rust-Tierney's arrest:

"That Mr. Rust-Tierney, a leading proponent of unrestricted access to the Internet, has now been arrested for receiving and possessing graphic child pornography should serve as testimony to the injudicious and baleful outgrowth of the legal challenges launches by the ACLU questioning the constitutionality of important legislation that protects children from Internet exploitation and content harmful to minors"

Mr. Clapp wasn't finished with this slimeball and the scumbags at the ACLU:

"When Mr. Rust-Tierney argued before the Loudoun county Library Board that unrestricted access to the resources of the Internet was essential for our children's ability to learn and communicate, and when groups like the ACLU contend that acceptable use policies alone are capable of protecting children online, they fail to acknowledge the tragic and devastating effects to children and families of both intentional and unintentional access to online pornography"

It is a damn shame that the socialists press can go on operating in the bias manner that it does. This is an extremely important story for parents in this country: And Americans in general. Yet, the socialists in the press have decided that henceforth, they will determine what you need to know: And what you don't need to know!

To the socialists and communists in the American press, you are on notice! There is a new dawning in American journalism. The "Shell Game Is Over!"

You will no longer be able to "Protect Your friends, Who Perform Evil Deeds In Our Society!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (4)

"DEMOCRATS TAKE THEIR MARCHING ORDERS FROM OSAMA BIN LADEN"

@ 06:05 AM (26 months, 10 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

It is now as plain as the nose on your face, the democrat party and the "Father" of Al Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden, share a common goal, "The Defeat Of The United States Military In Iraq."

If you ever had any doubts, those doubts should have been erased with the release of OBL's latest videotape. In this tape, his first in several years, Bin Laden can be heard excoriating members of the democrat party for not getting U.S. troops out of Iraq. Bin Laden reminds his "Friends In The Democrat party," that the American people put them in charge of both chambers of Congress to, "End The War."

"The Emperor With No Clothes," is no longer applicable to members of the democrat party. They and Osama Bin Laden, are one in the same. As a voter, and as an American, you need to ask yourself a very important question. How in the hell can I ever vote for "Any Member Of The Democrat Party," after listening to this disgusting videotape from Osama Bin Laden? Furthermore, after listening to that traitor, Senator Chuck Shumer tell the American people that the U.S. Marine Corps wasn't responsible for the peace and stability in the once volatile area of Iraq, known as Anbar Province, how can I as a conscientious American sell my country out to these "Reckless, Demented People?" Members of the democrat party!

The democrats are more concerned with maintaining power than with protecting America! Every American, party affiliation pushed aside, should be infuriated with members of the democrat party, and here's why. Osama Bin Laden gives the American public a "Stern Lecture" on the failure of democrats to end the war in Iraq. He even used democrat phaseology in regards to the public being opposed to the war! By the way, the socialists media which is in the tank for the democrat party, is also responsible for "Reinforcing" this recurrent theme in the psyche of the American public! In essence, the Bin Laden tape has "Turned Up The Heat" on democrats.

Democrats are already fanning out around the country, "Lying To The American People" about the report that General David Petraeus will present to the Congress on Monday. These incongruent, dishonorable people are in essence calling General Petraeus, "A Liar." They are saying that he is a puppet for the Bush administration; And that his report has been written by none other than, "George W. Bush."

General Petraeus from all accounts, is one of the most honorable individuals in America today: Yet, these shameless members of the democrat party have the nerve to sully his reputation and good name. I am with Rush Limbaugh on this one. The democrat party is "Sowing The Seeds For A Landslide Defeat," somewhere down the road. The thrashing that ultra-liberal George McGovern took in 1972, will look like child's play one day!

The "Fifth Column" is no longer a secret. They are members of the democrat party: And members of the socialists press. I've heard Bill O'Reilly call these people "Progressives." I would suggest that Mr. O'Reilly get himself "A Good Dictionary." There is "Nothing Progressive" about "Selling Your Country Out," just so you can stay in political power. Someone who is progressive, supports a movement that will benefit society as a whole, not just a small segment. Rather than calling these people "Secular Progressives," I would encourage Bill O'Reilly to call them anarchists!

Osama Bin Laden also called on the American public to join him--by converting to his form of Islam. Imagine that, this piece of dung--this 12th Century savage--telling us that "Islam" will help us end the war in Iraq. I know that there are idiots out there who are taking to heart, everything this guy said in his half-hour "Propaganda" tape. These are the people that bear watching!

The President commenting on the Bin Laden tape declared:

"This tape is a reminder about the dangerous world in which we live"

Of course Bin Laden's friends, members of the democrat party, and the socialists press will accuse the President of exacerbating the IslamoFascists problem, globally. These are dangerous people, who only know how to fight terrorism utilizing one tactic, "Blame Bush."

I for one am sick and tired of these traitorous meely -mouth cowards!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (12)

2007/9/7

"FORMER D.A. MIKE NIFONG TO SPEND 24 HOURS IN JAIL"

@ 03:00 PM (26 months, 11 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

I suppose the former Duke Lacrosse players should be breaking out the champagne at any moment!

Their former nemesis, Mike Nifong, the erstwhile District Attorney of Durham, North Carolina will spend the next 24-hours in jail on a contempt of court citation. A judge found that the disgraced Ex-District Attorney lied to the court when he said he had turned over to defense attorneys, every shred of evidence taken from critical DNA samples. Nifong could have received a stiffer sentence, however, the judge showed compassion. The question is why did he do this?

This reckless, power hungry little man, didn't show any compassion when he all but singlehandedly convicted the three Lacrosse players. He made their lives a veritable "living hell." Nifong was hoping to score points with African-Americans in his bid to win reelection. Although he got his wish, and won reelection to office, it was the Lacrosse players who ended up getting the last laugh. Nifong left office, a broken, disdained man!

Because of Nifong's gross malfeasance in office, the city of Durham will have to go to its coffers and extract millions of dollars to pay these boys who were also found guilty by the "justice brothers," Al Sharpton, and Jesse Jackson, even before they had their day in court.

The Associated Press is reporting that attorneys for the three players are asking for two important items:

* "30-Million Dollars" in damages

* Reformation of the Durham legal process

If the city balks at either of the above requests, they had better get ready for a huge lawsuit. The city has already made a couple of mistakes, (A) Hiring Mike Nifong(before he was elected as DA), and (B) Standing behind this scoundrel. Let's hope that City Fathers don't make a third mistake, by being bullheaded!

Attorneys for the three former Lacrosse players have met with Durham officials in an attempt to head off a lawsuit. The lawyers say the money, ten million for each player, would be pro-rated over a five year period. The attorneys which include Barry Scheck, who represented O.J. Simpson in his murder trial, stressed that legal reforms are non-negotiable!

The Durham Police Department has also come under some heavy criticism. The Durham P.D. helped Nifong obtain his bogus indictment. A special commitee has been looking into the role of the Durham P.D. The committee ended its work last month. In the meantime, insurance providers have warned the city that the committee's recommendations could provide legal fodder in the case of a lawsuit.

A lawsuit may be inevitable because the city of Durham has a five-million dollar insurance policy with a five-hundred dollar deductible. This policy "Will Not" come close to satisfying the demands made by the lawyers representing, David Evans, Collin Finnerty and Reade Seligmann. But, this is not the problems of these young men. They have spent their time "In Hell." It is time for the real culprits to sweat!

If you ask me, Nifong has gotten off easy, thus far. I believe that it is the duty of the city of Durham to go after this creep, criminally. They owe it to the good citizens of Durham: And also the "Duke Three." I would also counsel the three young men to sue the britches off of Nifong in civil court.

Here's hoping that Michael Nifong will not get to "Ride Off Into The Sunset" and also get to drink "Pina Coladas" and at the same time enjoy his more than adequate pension, which he does not deserve!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/6

"MEMO TO SENATOR CHUCK SHUMER: YOU SIR, ARE A BOLD-FACED LIAR"

@ 01:19 PM (26 months, 12 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

As a trained Clinical Psychologist, I was taught to not show feelings, either verbalizing same, or non-verbally!

My presentation was to be stoic at all times. Well, I am not in session with a patient as I write today's column. So, I can tell you how I'm feeling. I am angry as all get out at New York Senator, Chuck Schumer. He may as well have slapped me across the face with his recent hateful comments about my Marines in Anbar Province in Iraq!

This Brooklyn, New York loud mouth, stood on the U.S. Senate floor and declared:

"Let me be clear. The violence in Anbar has gone down despite the surge, not because of the surge. The inability of American Soldiers(Marines) to protect the tribes from Al Qaeda said to these tribes, we have to fight Al Qaeda ourselves. It wasn't that the surge brought peace here. It was that the warlords took peace here, created a temporary peace here and that was because there was no one else there protecting"

How condescinding of this boot licking socialists! To call the U.S. Marine Corps incapable of kicking the asses of a few hundred rag-tag IslamoFascists, well, that is beyond the pale. This leftist needs a long history lesson on the United States Marine Corps; and how they have come to be called, "Leathernecks, Devildogs, Grunts, etc!

As a young Marine "Who Wasn't Afraid To Serve His Country," I learned these words, "FROM THE HALLS OF MONTEZUMA, TO THE SHORES OF TRIPOLI, WE WILL FIGHT OUR COUNTRY'S BATTLES, ON THE LAND AND ON THE SEA." For "232 Years," the United States Marines have proven their mettle in campaign after campaign. No other branch of service has demonstrated this tenacity as the United States Marine Corps has done. Wherever there is a tough fight to be fought, the "President Of The United States," Calls on the "United States Marine Corps." Not the Army, not the Navy Seals, but the "United States Marine Corps." The Marines are what the other branches of services have tried to emulate, and that includes the SEALS!

Don't get me wrong, I am proud of all of those who serve, but the Marine Corps holds a special place in my heart. If you didn't go through those wooden barracks at Parris Island, you wouldn't understand what I'm talking about. Those wooden barracks turned out the men who fought in:

. Belleau wood in World War I

. Iwo Jima

. Guadalcanal

. Okinawa

. Inchon, South Korea

. Khe Sanh, near North Vietnam

. Hue City, South Vietnam

. Da nang, South Vietnam

No, a partisan political hack like Chuck Shumer wouldn't know anything about the bravery of the United States Marines who have fought and died, so that he could turn around and "Insult Their Memory." I really never liked Shumer: However, my dislike for him has now turned into "Total Disgust!" The one thing that I hate more than anything in a person is someone who is, "A Bold-Faced Liar." And that is what Chuck Shumer is, pure and simple!

To say that the "warlords" took matters into their own hands and singlehandedly ran Al Qaeda out of town is disingenous at best. To call my Marines, "Soldiers," is also insulting. This shows you just how ignorant "Senator" Chuck Shumer is! I bet this arrogant, insulting coward, couldn't find his behind "with both hands." Yet, he has the gall to say the Marines are not responsible for the peace in Anbar Province. Please, somebody place this fat, pathetic slob on a plane and fly him into Anbar, so he can take his message to the Marines "In Person"!

Shumer represents all that is wrong with America today. His values are antithetical to those in the majority. Instead of rooting our guys on, this despicable excuse for a human being, rails against my Marines. Not only is this guy a panderer to the wackos on the left, this little man hates our military. The very same people who are putting it on the line day in and day out, so that people like Chuck Shumer can insult them. Well, that rips it for me! It is always didactic as far as I am concerned, that the people with the "Biggest Mouths," never served in the military. Shumer who was born in 1950, was a no-show in Vietnam. He was too busy earning his "Law Degree At Harvard."

I understand that he has freedom of speech. But, even the Supreme Court noted, there is a limit to free speech. This man has no honor. He has no love for his country. How else could you explain this imbecil taking to the senate floor and "blasting the finest branch of service ever assembled?" For your information, Senator, these men are called, "United States Marines!"

It is clear, Shumer and the democrats are dead set against our victory in Iraq. They have been telling the American people for five years, "We Have Lost The War." Now that the surge is working, and the IslamoFascists are on the run, Shumer and the cowardly democrat party refuse to lay down their talking points.

There would have been a time in this country when this man would have been tarred and feathered and rode out of town on a rail for his traitorous remarks. Sadly, Americans as I noted in a recent column, loathed conflict. We are fastly turning into a nation of girlie men. When you outlaw, "A Game Of Tag," as was done recently at a school in Los Angles, what does that tell you about the future of this country?

I am willining to pony up some money to help fly Chuck Shumer to Anbar Province, so he can tell the Marines what he thinks of them face to face. What about you, Mr. and Mrs. America?

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/5

"CO-DEPENDENCY WILL HURT THE REPUBLICAN PARTY"

@ 12:10 PM (26 months, 13 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Co-dependency or enabling behavior is most often associated with substance abusers or alcoholics.

Yet, this behavior can also be seen in other relationships. Co-dependency and enabling are one in the same. Here now, is a quick working definition of these two terms:

* Trying to protect the person from the consequences of his/her actions

* Trying to control the behavior of the individual

By now, you have heard that disgraced Idaho U.S. Senator Larry Craig is "Reconsidering His Decision" to leave his seat as he promised to do, next month. What has happened since Craig made his announcement last week that he would depart? He has found some support. Another way of putting it, Craig has found people willing to "Enable" his sick behavior. Arlen Specter who doesn't know when to shut up--said that "we should wait for all of the facts to come in before making a decision."

That tepid support was good enough for Senator Craig to take a step back, and once again think of, "Larry Craig." He was thinking of Larry Craig when he was busted in June for attempting to have gay sex in a Minnesota airport restroom. He was thinking of Larry Craig when he entered a quick guilty plea to disorderly conduct charges--related to the incident. Craig claims that he just wanted to "put this issue behind him," hence, his admission of disorderly conduct. Balderdash!

This man claims to not be a homosexual. I am not surprised. It takes an alcoholic to hit rock bottom before he will admit that he is an alcoholic. I have worked with people who have borrowed or stolen thousands of dollars from family members, just to quiet the demons in their souls. The alcohol or the crack-cocaine was only a temporary solution. Once the high wore off, reality set in. In order to "Not Deal With Reality" the addict, and that includes the alcoholic had to pick up and use once again.

Senator Craig is "feeling his oats" once again. The homosexual demons have quieted down for now. Once again he is feeling "Normal." He is also feeling cocky and back to his arrogant self. His enablers are not helping. They have circled the wagons, and this is what the addict looks for. Am I comparing homosexuals to addicts? For the most part, you betcha! That is not to say that some homosexuals aren't born "gay." However, do not believe all of the misinformation, and "Loud Noise" that you are hearing today, that every gay person on this planet was born this way. Most are wrestling with their own personal demons. Like the alcoholic, they engage in homosexuality because of various reasons. Homosexuals have "Millions Of Enablers." Many are politicians, employers, family and friends! All thinking they are helping the person, when in essence, they are hindering the homosexual from discovering who he or she really is!

Remember the definition of co-dependency and or an enabler. A good clinician would have to go back to the homosexual's family of origin, if he/she wished to gain insight into why someone would engage in what used to be termed in psychology, abberant behavior!

Senator Larry Craig has gone out and hired himself a battery of lawyers. His attorneys have been busier than a "One Legged Man In A Butt Kicking Contest." His lawyers have called on the Senate ethics commitee to toss out a complaint stemming from the "Restroom Affair." They say the fact that Craig tried to pick up an undercover cop for the purpose of engaging in gay sex, had nothing to do with his "Official Duties." Are you kidding me? I know that we live in decadent times, but this takes the cake!

This is a United States Senator. His actions reflexs on the Senate as a whole. For the love of God, don't these leeches think about our children? Don't they realize that kids have eyes and ears? Or is it, they just don't give a damn? Larry Craig has stooped to a new low in my opinion. The "Crapper Affair" was one thing, but to try to clean up this mess by hiding behind the fact that he wasn't "in his official capacity while out creeping on the downlow, is beyond incredulity." But, these are the times that we live in, ladies and gentlemen!

The democrats will seize upon this stunt by Craig. Not that they are above reproach. The democrats are a shady group of characters, all to themselves. However, it is the republicans who have set themselves up as the party of "Family Values." Craig and all of his egoism, will hurt the repubican party. But, I don't think Larry Craig really cares about the party. Remember, this guy thinks like "An Addict." An addict is self-absorbed!

This is the same guy who entered a guilty plea to disorderly conduct, and who now has hired a criminal defense attorney, in hopes of "reopening the case." A Spokesman for Craig stated:

" We're still preparing as if Senator Craig will resign September 30th, but the outcome of the legal case in Minnesota and the ethics investigation will have an impact on whether we're able to stay in the fight--and stay in the Senate"

Remember, it was Mark Foley and the "reverend" Ted Haggard, both homosexuals, who helped usher in the do-nothing democrat congress that we are presently stuck with.These two creeps gave Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid the ammunition that they needed to convince the American people to change the leadership in the House and Senate.

Memo to those enabling Larry Craig: "Stop Now!"

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

2007/9/4

"I TOLD YOU THAT LIBERALS HATE THE MILITARY"

@ 03:32 PM (26 months, 14 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Maybe you have seen the commercials that have been put together for a group of Iraqi War Veterans!

The commercials are done in excellent tastes. To a man, each Veteran is calling on Congress to "Not Cut And Run" until we have finished the job in Iraq. This galvanizing of the troops has caused socialists and liberals in this country to cry "foul." It is okay when they march out a Veteran who is against the war: But, when we Conservatives turn the tables on them, these people start whining like, "the little girlie men that they are."

The socialists and liberals say we are "Using These Veterans." Perish the thought that a Veteran would have enough sense to make up his own mind. This is what socialists and liberals are good at doing, "putting words into the mouths" of the people they "Use." Look at what they did to, Cindy Sheehan. By the way, she was most certainly thrown under the bus by her friends in the media, now wasn't she? This pathetic woman can't buy a single line in the New York Times: or their counterpart on the left coast, The Los Angles Times. A couple of years ago, Sheehan was "The Socialists Poster Child For Their Anti-War Sentiments." Now that they have used her up, they wouldn't give this moron the time of day! I hear tell that she is running against Nancy Pelosi for Congress. Good luck Cindy on getting any type of press coverage!

Now that another group of patriots have come out in support of completing the mission in Iraq, the duplicitous socialists and liberals have started to attack them. These are the same people who will tell you they "Love The Military." I can remember how we were treated when we came back from Vietnam. A friend of mine's, who happens to be a retired deputy sheriff in my area, told me that he arrived at LAX, on crutches. Seems he took a few rounds from a commie AK-47. I hate those damn rifles!

Some moron of a woman threw a vile "Of Urine" on my friend. He said he was hurting too bad to kick her ass. However, there was a Soldier who witnessed this abysmal treatment given to this heroic Marine. He forgot that he was a gentleman. He kicked the S..t out of this commie sympathizer. Talk about poetic justice! A L.A. cop saw the entire "beat down." But, he told the Solider, "I didn't See Anything." I am still moved to tears over how many of my fellow Marines and Soldiers were treated by the same people who today say, "We Love The Military."

Hillary Clinton is one of those people. The other day, she was screaming at the top of her lungs that we should "Get Out Of Iraq, Now." Forget the fact that the "Surge Is Working." Even this hypocrite admits that the military build-up has worked. Like a typical "Schizopherenic," this poor excuse for a Presidential candidate can't make up her mind on any of the important issues facing this Nation. But, she knows how to snatch victory from the jaws of our brave men and women fighting in Iraq.

If you will recall it was the waffling democrats who said we were losing the war militarily. Now that our guys have kicked ass and taken some important names, these socialists say, "But What About The Political Situation In Iraq." They maintain there is no functioning government in this embattled country. There is no pleasing these two-faced liars.

The President made a trip to Anbar Province on Labor Day. Anbar was an area that the democrats used to be able to point to and say, "See, We Are losing The War." Anbar was at one time a stronghold for Al Qaeda. Well, our guys went in there and cleaned out these rats. The Tribal Leaders in Anbar have played a pivotal role in turning the tables on the IslamoFascists.

Some democrats have accused the President of posturing, by visiting Anbar Province. No, you idiots that is not posturing. The President simply showed these cowards that he could not only "Talk The Talk," but, he could also, "Walk The Walk." He did something that people like Hillary Clinton, John "The Breck Girl Edward, Barack Hussein Obama wouldn't dream of doing. The President showed the American people that he was not afraid of placing himself in harm's way, in order to demonstrate that "THE SURGE HAS WORKED."

Like little gnats, the democrats have become a pain in the neck. They have no solutions for fighting the war on terror, save, making life more and more comfortable for the IslamoFascists.

These people have certainly shown the American people that they do not want us to win the war against terrorism. They have bought into our defeat, "Lock, Stock And Barrel."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

Comments (4)

2007/9/2

"GAY MARRIAGE GETS GREEN LIGHT IN MIDDLE AMERICA"

@ 01:32 PM (26 months, 16 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Move over Massachusetts...

Another pinhead judge has decided that he will be the final arbiter on same-sex marriage. This would not be news if the story broke in New York State or Connecticut. But, this story comes from of all places, "Iowa."

Robert Hanson, a district court judge noted in his decision, that a prior ban against same-sex marriage, "violates due process and equal protection rights and was unconstitutional and invalid." Legal pundits say this ruling will end up in the Iowa state supreme court. Nonetheless, Hanson "Thinking" for "All" Iowans declared:

"This court has yet to hear any convincing argument as to how excluding same-sex couples from getting married promotes responsible reproduction in general or by different sex couples in particular"

Sounds like "his honor" had his mind made up before handing down his tainted ruling. If I understand his mumbo-jumbo quote correctly, although people of the same sex can not produce a child, "Forget About It." That in no way will impact on the reproduction process in America!

There is a reason why same-sex people can not produce a child. This guy should be forced to take a class in biology, "101." The creator made man; and then woman. Ah, forget it! This idiot wouldn't understand. People like this judge Hanson "Make Laws, They Don't Interpret Them." In essense, this arrogant little man has told the Iowa legislature that their passing a law, designating a marriage was that of a man and a woman didn't meet his criteria. The legislature was only doing what its constituents expected them to do! Protect the sanctity of marriage.

Although the socialists media isn't telling you this, marriage is under attack by homosexuals across the country. It is not just marriage that is under attack, the family is also in the crosshairs of gays. I have said this before, obtaining the legal right to marry in every state in the Union, "Will Not Make These People Happy." Destroying the American family, aha, now that's a different story!

If the Hanson ruling stands, however, I rather doubt it, we can start saying goodby to the human race, as we know it. Moronic jurists around this nation are opening a pandora's box--and once completedly opened--we will have hell to pay! Already, Americans undergo "1.3 Million Abortions Each Year." Thirteen-thousand children are aborted because of rape. I understand the latter! But, what of the "1.2 Million Other Children Aborted?" when you factor in the number of abortions that Americans have; and you give gays the right to marry--please do not tell me that the reproduction process will not be impacted!

Whatever happened to the rights of the majority? I doubt seriously if the majority of Iowans support same-sex marriage. So, the pressure groups run to the courts to get their way. And I thought Iowa was a sane place to raise a family. "What was I thinking?"

One final note on this reckless "judge." He tossed out a law that says only a man and a woman can have a valid marriage under Iowa state law. Said judge Hanson:

"The law constitutes the most intrusive means by the state to regulate marriage. This statute is an absolute prohibition on the ability of gay and lesbian individuals to marry a person of their choosing"

It is obvious that there is no talking to this guy. He is "pro-gay." As noted, this so-called jurist had his mind made up before deciding the case.

Let's hope the supreme court out in Iowa has more common sense then this numbskull!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |

"THANKS MICHAEL VICK FOR GIVING THE LUNATICS A PLATFORM"

@ 08:59 AM (26 months, 16 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Now that Michael Vick has pled guilty to engaging in promoting dog fighting, he has opened the door to an array of nut jobs who say they "Love Animals!"

Vick's stupidity and arrogance has given instant credibility to the wackos at PETA. Prior to his being busted, PETA in the minds of most Americans was nothing more than a bunch of publicity seeking personality disordered individuals. Before Vick stood before Judge Henry Hudson in a Richmond courtroom and admitted that he was the head impresario of "Bad News Kennels," the PETA people were on every major news network. Americans need to understand that the socialists press is vigorously:

* Anti-hunting

* Anti-Second Amendment

So, this writer was not surprised to see the networks open their doors to the animal nut cases. It is one thing to love your animal. But, when you elevate that animal to the same status as a human being, this is where we part company. When you say that you are against all forms of hunting, this is where we part company also. Has any of the morons at PETA or those in the socialists press questioned what would happen if we allowed all form of of wild life to proliferate unchecked? I doubt it. However, a couple of things would take place:

* Carrying capacity(THE LAND THAT HOLDS THE ANIMALS) would be destroyed due to over foraging

* Deer and other wildlife would die of starvation and or disease due to the above

* Animals, namely black, brown, and grizzly bears would attack and kill humans, thanks to unchecked proliferation

In the dream world of people like PETA, the animals would stop proliferating: And all would be well in the animal kingdom! This shows you the stupidity of these people: And those following behind these wackos are in need of intense psychotherapy!

How we have arrived at this point in our country is beyond me. We have a foreigner who heads PETA telling the American people how to live their lives. Whatever happened to that good old American spirit that years gone by, would have told Ingrid Newkirk and her PETA organization to, "Go To Hell?"

Michael Vick with all of his stupidity has made the nuts at PETA look "Sane." Now, that's scary! Here is what one writer said to the "Letter To The Editor" section of my ultra liberal newspaper:

" NFL player Michael Vick has pleaded guilty to federal dog-fighting charges. Subjecting animals to any kind of abuse is evil and cowardly. The majority of persons who are judging Michael Vick are nothing more than hypocrities. Millions of animals are slaughters in factory farms each year. Not only are they forced to live in deplorable , inhumane conditions, they are drugged, tortured, maimed, slaughtered, boiled and skinned alive while fully conscious. Anyone who eats meat, cheese, eggs or drinks a glass of milk is directly responsible for the premeditated murder, torture and abuse of an innocent animal. People who eat or use animal products are in effect paying slaughterhouse worker "hit-men and "hired guns' to abuse and kill animals for them so they can wolf down a hot dog in five minutes. I have asked many self-proclaimed "dog/animals lovers" to view videos on the Web sites of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals, all-creatures.org and Humane Farming Associations, and the majority refuse because they don't want to know or get upset. Hypocrites!"

I decided to print this ridiculous propaganda in its entirety, so that you could read for yourself. What this silly woman who wrote this garbage is calling for, are people who will march in rote step to the crap that comes out of PETA or other insane anti-hunting organizations. In their world, there is only one way to live, "Their Way." In their screwed up world, you are not entitled to make a decision for yourself, "They Will Make It For You." Is this starting to sound like "Communism, Cloaked In Altruism?"

It is time for Americans to wake up. The "Mentally Impaired" are operating the insane asylum. Another Kool-Aid drinker said, "Treat All Killers Without Mercy." Folks, there are dangerous people out there. And guess what? These Kool Aid drinkers vote largely, "Democratic." When it is time to "Call In Favors," the democrats will bend over and grab their ankles for these nuts! And the good people like you and me will get "The Royal Shaft."

What Michael Vick did was disgusting. However, to take out a broad brush and say the animals that we eat, courtesy of our local food chain are treated like medieval times, is both libelous and disingenous!

Get a clue America. Communism "IS NOT DEAD." The "Reds" just moved their headquarters to, "America."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

Permalink |