The Truth

Reporting facts. Not rumours. Politically, I am a Conservative. My concerns are myriad for this country. I will shine the light of "Truth" on any politician, who threatens this land that I love. Yes, that includes members of the "Political Right."

2007/8/16

"IMUS SETTLES WITH CBS AND NOW THE VERMIN WANT THEIR PIECE OF THE PIE"

@ 12:16 PM (27 months, 20 days ago)

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

 

Ordinarily, I wouldn't call the young lady who plays for the Rutger's basketball team vermin. However, in the wake of her "suing" Don Imus for libel, slander and defamation--only a low life would stoop that low! A face to face apology from the mega media star was not enough. Now, it's time to, "Show Me The Money Baby!

Again, I must reinterate that I am not a fan of "The Liberal" Don Imus, who reportedly settled in the neighborhood of "Twenty-Million Dollars With CBS". However, his comments of "Nappy Headed Hos" didn't insult me in the least. All of these thin skin people like Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson need to be tied down and made to listen to a weekend marathon of what is called music from low lifes like, Snoop Dogg, Eminem, Fifty Cent, Young Jeezy, The Game, Little Wayne, Birdman, etc.

Sharpton pretends that he was outraged over Imus' comments. What about his comments about the Duke Lacrosse players. These innocent young men are still awaiting an apology from Sharpton and Jackson for indicting them long before all of the evidence was in. What about Sharpton's support of one, "Tawana Brawley," who said that she had been raped and racial epithets written in feces was placed on her by white men? Where is "Brother Al" at with his "Outrage At Being Used By Brawley?"  And his smearing the good names of some upstate New York law enforcement officials!

The fact of the matter ladies is gentlement, is that Sharpton nor Jackson both pieces of pond scum, do nothing to advance race relations in this country. They are simply demagogues. Both looking to find the next incendiary case that they can exploit to their financial advantage. Shapton and Jackson are professional interlopers--and this profession has proven to be  quite lucrative over the years for "The Justice Brothers." How else can you explain theses two dunderheads being able to criss-cross the country at the drop of a hat. Live like Kings, yet can not explain where they get their money from?

Kia Vaughn is the young lady who is suing Don Imus. She is saying that a "Boatload" of cash would ease her psychological pain. Enters her scumbag attorney, Richard Ancowitz who told ABC News:

"This is a lawsuit in order to restore the good name and reputation of my client, Kia Vaughn"

What "Good Name?" Who the hell ever heard of Kia Vaughn prior to Imus calling her and some of her teammates, "Nappy Headed Hos?" Ancowitz knows full well that this is all about the money. Yet, he said with a straight face:

"Today's suit refers to terms used by Imus April 4--including referring to women on the team as "nappy headed"--as "debasing, demeaning, humiliating, and denigrating" to Vaughn and her fellow players. There's no way these bigoted remarks should have seen the light of day"

All that I've got to say is, where the hell has this nit-wit lawyer been for the past decade? Black people say worst thing than that to one another. How about, "Hey My Nigger!" To some ignorant blacks, this is a formal greeting. To me as an African-American, this shows how stupid these morons are. They have no sense of history. They have no sense of the etiology of this nefarious term. Yet, because they are black, they get a pass. But, not from this writer.

Kia Vaughn knows full well that she has heard language like this in her neighborhood, and in her own locker-room. Yet, she pretends that her pristine pride has somehow been sullied, because "A White Man Said Nappy Headed Hos." Bulletin, Bulletin.....Those babes did look rather rough from the video that Imus showed. But, we all know that, "It's All About The Money."

Here's a thought: If this were a principal woman, she would have accepted Mr. Imus's apology and moved on. But, Kia Vaughn lacks principals. I wish that someone would explain to me how money will somehow remove the "stain that Don Imus has placed on Kia Vaughn." Prior to this lawsuit, Ms. Vaughn enjoyed the support of most Americans. Now, they know what type of person she is.

By the way, this little leech is not only suing Don Imus. She has gone after MSNBC, NBC Universal, CBS Radio, CBS Corp., Viacom Inc., Westwood One radio and Imus producer Bernard McGuirk.

I stand corrected on one thing. This is not just about money. This shameless woman wants to inflict pain on all parties concerned. I am shocked that she would sue Mr. McGuirk. This man is not rich. He has a family to support. Apparently, that doesn't matter to this money grabbing parasite and her sleazeball attorney. Is this what they teach at Rutgers Kia? "An Eye For An Eye!"

The sad thing about this entire affair is that Kia Vaughn is the first to sue. But, she will certainly not be the last. Look for others to follow in kind. They will each find a sleazy attorney who will crawl from under a rock and pontificate on how:

"That Racist, Don Imus And His Evil Confederate, Bernard McGuirk,"  Sullied The Pure And Chaste  Reputations Of These Fine Upstanding, Great American women: Whose Reputations Were As Pure As The Driven Snow Until That Fateful Day, April 4, When The Words "Nappy Headed Hos" Were Uttered. The Only Remedy is Money--Lots And Lots Of Money Which Will Give These Fine Citizens Back Their tarnished Reputations." 

The above speaks volumes for the Rutgers Women's Basketball Team, and the values our young people are given by University adults who are supposed to be their "Guiding Lights"!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

Comment(s) »

  1. Yep, total BS. And, once again, it's always about the money. It took me a while to come to the epiphany that certain shock jocks got that title for a reason. They're not about facts they're about being a personality and keeping the names out there. Sharpton, Jackson, Sheehan, etc.. all play that game to different degrees. Who could take Howard Stern seriously? But he's a personality that propelled his career by being outrageous.

    Imus may have been over the line but, like you, I'm not that easily offended and always consider the source. I find myself blogging on a level I wouldn't necessarily use on a personal level. But I'm just a curmudgeon venting, not a personality. If I were a recognized personality I'd probably be worse. *S*

    My limited understanding of such suits is the plaintiff having to prove damages. I think filing the suit has done more to damage her reputation than anything Imus said.

    Comment by Burns— 2007/08/16 @ 06:03 PM — (Reply)

  2. Yep, I agree with you that this is total B.S. Furthermore, you hit the nail on the head when you say this "bogus lawsuit" will do more to hurt the reputation of Kia Vaughn than anything that Don Imus could say. University students can be a tough lot. I'm predicting that Ms. Vaughn will catch hell this upcoming semester, for being a "lawsuit whore."

    Dr. Lewis

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2007/08/17 @ 02:32 AM — (Reply)

  3. Opps. I should have said "lawsuit ho."

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2007/08/17 @ 02:34 AM — (Reply)

  4. Gentleman: I think I am looking at this from another prospective. I would detest a public personality publicly calling my daughters those names. The basketball players did nothing other than have a superb season resulting in being in the championship game on which Imus commented. The fact that Imus lost his job(s) over what he said is utterly ridiculous. I am delighted his employers were forced to pay him a lot of money for him not to work for them. Remember who his employers are: mainstream media democrat ho's. Personally I know that I would be heartsick and my daughters devastated to be called those names. Sure they are just words. What other recourse is there other than the court system? Are they entitled to money? Who knows..but it will be wrangled out. How much? Again who knows. Emotional distress is similar to the non quantifiable injuries one suffers when struck by a drunk driver, is a victim of malpractice or raped. It is unreasonable to expect anyone to be verbally abused and do nothing. It is certainly a possibility. I have not seen any of the women on that team act with anything other than class which Governor Corzine for example will never be able to achieve. Why do I mention him? He was critically injured in a vehicle accident caused by his driver speeding to the Imus / Rutgers team news conference. Why was he going there? To get his ugly bald headed babboon mug in front of the television cameras just like Al Sharpton regarding an issue he had absolutely nothing to do with.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2007/08/17 @ 04:05 AM — (Reply)

  5. I agree with much of what you have said. However, where we part company is the tact that has been taken by Kia Vaughn. As I see it, she should have made her intentions known before Imus met with the players, while on his knees. I guess in some macabre way, she enjoyed watching him grovel. And after that, she sucker punches the old guy with a lawsuit. That is not class! The Rutger's Women's Basketball team indeed showed they were a class act. That is, until Ms. Vaughn was hynotized by "Filthy Lucre."

    Dr. Lewis

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2007/08/17 @ 12:07 PM — (Reply)

  6. Gentleman: I think I am looking at this from another prospective. I would detest a public personality publicly calling my daughters those names. The basketball players did nothing other than have a superb season resulting in being in the championship game on which Imus commented. The fact that Imus lost his job(s) over what he said is utterly ridiculous. I am delighted his employers were forced to pay him a lot of money for him not to work for them. Remember who his employers are: mainstream media democrat ho's. Personally I know that I would be heartsick and my daughters devastated to be called those names. Sure they are just words. What other recourse is there other than the court system? Are they entitled to money? Who knows..but it will be wrangled out. How much? Again who knows. Emotional distress is similar to the non quantifiable injuries one suffers when struck by a drunk driver, is a victim of malpractice or raped. It is unreasonable to expect anyone to be verbally abused and do nothing. It is certainly a possibility. I have not seen any of the women on that team act with anything other than class which Governor Corzine for example will never be able to achieve. Why do I mention him? He was critically injured in a vehicle accident caused by his driver speeding to the Imus / Rutgers team news conference. Why was he going there? To get his ugly bald headed babboon mug in front of the television cameras just like Al Sharpton regarding an issue he had absolutely nothing to do with.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2007/08/17 @ 04:15 AM — (Reply)

  7. If I got 20million every time I was called somthing in my career, I would be able to call Bill Gates "poor white trash".......Do I sue every time some dope seeking ass doesn't get his or her vicodin fix in the E.R. after the 4+ visits in one week......naaaaa.....I am a bigger person than that! A public apology should be enough......This suit if successfull will set a nasty "pandoras box" precident....Although Imus is an anus.......The comment "aint nutin" that isn't said on a daily basis by people of color, so maybe on behalf of all the people out there of color we should file a class action suit against martin lawrence will smith , damn near every rapper ever existed, and the entire cast and crew of harlem nights, tales from the hood, car wash, jungle fever, spike lee, (I could go on for way too many pages).....and sue them for tarnishing the reputation of every african american living today!!! bottom line.....just another pathetic monetary feeding frenzy feuled by the good ole "race card".....what a crock....riff

    Comment by riffran— 2007/08/17 @ 07:00 AM — (Reply)

  8. A public apology from Imus should have sufficed. However, we live in such a narcissistic society, that we should not be surprised by the Kia Vaughn lawsuit. Look at her role models at Rutgers. I am willing to bet that they are mainly card carrying socialists; and members of the democrat party. I have not forgotten that Imus is also a flaming liberal. Which is instructive to us all! And that is, liberals will eat each other, like the snakes they are, if there is a financial or political gain to be made! I pointed out in my column that Kia Vaughn has heard worse than, "Nappy Headed Hos." But, she presents as this heretofore,"Sunny,Virgin Flower," whose petals have been plucked and trampled sunder, by one, "John Donald Imus."

    Comment by Dr. Forest Lewis— 2007/08/17 @ 12:23 PM — (Reply)

  9. I have to agree with Barry. If each girl on the team gets $75 and gets out of school debt free with that, it seems fair to me. Don't forget, for the rest of their lives, they will be asked, "hey, aren't you one of the nappy headed ho's?"

    Personally I would not like my daughter to have to deal with that. No offense gentlemen, but I sense a subcurrent of a belief that there was at least some truth in what Imus said so why have any sympathy for the girls. Should he have been fired? No. Am I glad he is being paid a ton of money to do nothing? Hell yes, those liberal media companies deserve it and so do their shareholders. When it's all said and done what is the big deal about perhaps a $500K charitable contribution to deal with the whole thing by Imus that is deductible? Sounds fair to me.

    Comment by Ernie Els— 2007/08/17 @ 01:45 PM — (Reply)

  10. P.S. I am a HUGE fan of Will Smith and Martin Lawrence and will watch Bad Boys 10 if it comes out....lol...riff

    Comment by riffran— 2007/08/17 @ 07:03 AM — (Reply)

  11. Iagree with all of that. However picture them as your own kids. I think paying off the remainder of their tuition bills would be the right thing to do. In addition, Al Sharpton should never be given publicity again unless HE pays for commercial air time or advertisements in print media.

    Comment by Barry G.— 2007/08/17 @ 07:57 AM — (Reply)

» Leave a comment


:mrgreen: :neutral: :twisted: :arrow: :shock: :smile: :???: :cool: :evil: :grin: :idea: :oops: :razz: :roll: :wink: :cry: :eek: :lol: :mad: :sad: :!: :?:

Preview:

You say:

To prevent spam, please type in the exact word you see in this image: CAPTCHA
To refresh the image, click here. Otherwise, contact us.

  • Your E-mail address is never displayed. If you enter it, it will only be visible to the blog author
  • Since there already are comments to this post, your eventual comment might trigger a notification e-mail to the persons that commented before you.
  • The line and paragraph breaks automatically