The Truth

BY:DR. FOREST LEWIS

The lefties at the New York Times have pulled out their crystal balls and are predicting that "Latinos" will make the G.O.P. pay in the Presidential election in 2008.

The Times says after speaking with "Many" Republican lawmakers, consultants and Hispanic voters," they walked away with understanding that "The Amnesty Bill" which Republicans voted against in large numbers, would come back to haunt them. The Times says the G.O.P. "May Have Greatly Damaged The Party's Ability To Meet Its Enduring Goal Of Attracting A Large Percentage Of The Growing Number Of Hispanic Voters--Thousands Of Whom Are Ostensibly In Line With The Party On A Host Of Other Issues."

What the New York Times and other socialists media pundits aren't telling you is that a number of "Democrats In The Senate" also voted against the "Amnesty Bill." But the Times isn't reporting that the Democrats will be hurt in "08." They aren't saying that Senate Majority Leader, Harry Reid is an impotent leader, who can't convince "Blue Dog Democrats" to follow him off of the cliff on the ridiculous issues that he supports. The Times is busily trying to convice the American people that it is the Republicans who have fallen into disfavor with "Latinos."

If that is the case, so be it. The future of our country was at stake a few days ago. I salute the Republicans and "Democrats" who stood up and voted against ending cloture in the Senate. Because of their stand, a stake was driven through the heart of this traitorous bill. Loud mouth, Teddy Kennedy who has a history of pushing "Amnesty Bills" for Hispanics, has warned Americans, "We Will Be Back. This Issue Is Not Going Away." I believe this fat, elitist slob!

Nothwithstanding, I am not concerned about "Latinos" voting against Republicans. Hell, what's new about that anyway?  Hispanics like African-Americans are deeply ensconced in the camp of the Democrat party. The fact that Republicans voted against this "Amnesty Bill" wouldn't have made any difference to these folks. They are like mind numbed robots--voting in rote fashion for a bunch of people who couldn't care less about them. Cubans are the only Latino group that has stood behind the Republican party. The other Hispanic groups have always been a mainstay in the Democrat party.

While the Times is predicting hard times ahead for the Republicans, a writer by the name of Julie Hirschfeld Davis of the Associated Press wrote that the defeat of the "Amnesty Bill" could "Carry A Heavy Political Consequences For Republicans And Democrats." There seems to be somewhat of a disconnect between the A-P story and the one written by the New York Times. Both of these outlets are no friend of the G.O.P. The A-P and the New York Times are guilty of telling half truths--and at other times, "Printing Outright Lies, Against The Bush Administration."

Just for your edification, fifteen Democrats joined the Republicans in killing this "Amnesty Bill." Nancy Pelosi isn't about to take up this issue. She knows that she would  end up with a political "Bloody Nose" like her counterpart, Harry Reid. What the socialist press fails to understand is that it was not just Republican voters who "Blew Up The Capitol Hill SwitchBoard." There were millions of Democrat voters and Independents who also saw this threat and flooded their Senators offices with telephone calls. But, don't expect the socialists to tell you this!

I find it interesting that the socialists press calls the bill "Bush's Bill." It wasn't just the President's bill. It was also Reid's, Pelosi's, Kennedy's, Kohn-Kerry's, ad-infinitum!

The president of Mexico, Felipe Calderon had to put in his two-cents on this issue. This idiot said that the U.S. Senate "Made A Grave Error In Killing The Legislation."  This genius also said:

"This action would cut off legal immigration, permit continued unlawful immigration and human rights violations and decrease safety on both sides of the border"

Where does one start in debunking this nonsense? First of all, "el presidente" why don't you stop your people from invading our country? You can do this by positioning your "fine" military on your side of the border. But you don't want to do that because of several reasons:

* You can rid your country of criminal scum by sending them here

* The billions of dollars that "Illegal Aliens" here in our country send back to Mexico every year,  helps your economy exponentially

* The hordes of "Illegal Aliens" to our country not only violates our sovereignty: It has placed a huge drain on our social services, and infrastructure; It has also forced millions of Americans to flee places like California, thus turning the Golden State over to criminals. Pat Buchannan has renamed California, "Mexifornia." I bet you like that sound, huh "el presidente?"

On the issue of human rights violations, hey "el presidente" we aren't invading your country and dragging your folks out into the desert:They are doing this of their own free will. We don't owe these people anything. So, where are the "human rights violations?"

I think this guy may have consumed too many fried beans, because he is so full of it that,  "His Eyes Are Brown." 

I am not concerned about a "Latino Backlash In O8." I'll tell you what does concern me though. "Illegal Aliens" breaking the law and voting by the "Millions." Now that my friends,  is a frightening thought!

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM