The Truth

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

A truncated message to socialist democrats: We are not fighting a "Conventional War In Iraq Or Afghanistan."

We are engaging the IslamoFascists in guerrilla warfare. Mr. Webster describes guerrilla warfare in this manner:

"The use of surprise raids, sabotage, etc., by small, mobile groups of irregular forces operating in enemy-held territory"

Let's process the above definition for those dullard individuals in the socialist democrat party. A surprised raid does not have to lend itself to just a small army. A surprised raid could involve a single individual: for example, a coward strapped with explosives who enters a restaurant and blows himself up, along with everyone else: or an insurgent who gets behind the wheel of a car, selects a target of opportunity, and blows himself to kingdom come, taking as many innocent people that he/she can with their pathetic ass.

Sabotage has been seen in Iraq. For example, the bombing of oil pipe lines: designed to disrupt the flow of oil; and the subsequent flow of currency needed for the Iraqi people.

The insurgents operating in the Iraqi theatre are indeed irregular fighters. They do not wear uniforms; and most of those fighting members of the coalition are reportedly from different countries in the Middle East, and Africa.

Socialist democrats understand full well, that this is an unconventional war. They have to know this. They also understand that ferreting out the cowards who fight against our men are women is a difficult task. Socialist democrats have given the American people the impression that if they had a democrat in the White house; and if they controlled both Chambers of the House with a huge majority, they would have won the war on terror by now.  

That type of thinking is easily refuted. First of all, democrats do not have the stomach for war. Secondly, they have a history of placing the lives of Americans in harms way in order to amass votes. Remember, "Slick Willie" did virtually nothing during the 1990's to fight the growing Islamofascists threat. Despite what Clinton says, "He Alone Is Responsible For Osama Bin Laden" still having the strength to draw his next breath. "BJ Clinton" could have taken OBL down, but he elected not to. So, I would recommend that you discount what this "Pathological Liar" says regarding his "Trying" to kill Bin Laden.

George Bush has made some giantic blunders in the fight against the IslamoFascists. I do not believe that there are very many people who would disagree with this assessment. He is responsible for tying the hands of our men--thus preventing them from fighting a full fledged war against these 12th century savages.

If Bush had declared "Martial Law" as soon as our men secured Baghdad, I doubt very seriously if we would have the mess that we are currently witnessing. When you go to war, there should be no doubt about your mission, objective, and goals. Bush was clear on the mission--however, he had no clue about his objectives and goals for Iraq, once this country was under the control of the coalition.

What ensued was chaos--mayhem--and more chaos and mayhem. A simple declaration of martial law could have headed off what we now see in the embattled country known as Iraq. The imposition of martial law would have meant:

* Curfews

* No weapons in the hands of non-military people

* Absolutely "No" militia groups

* No demonstrations

* Perhaps most importantly, "Shut" the country of Baghdad down for six months. That means, no driving, no bicyling, "Nothing" that the cowardly insurgents could use to transport their packages of death

* Shoot to kill "Anyone" violating the rules of martial law

* Seal off the Iraqi borders with her neighbors in Iran and Syria

Why the harsh treatment? Simply put, the Iraqi people were not ready for the type of democracy that George W. Bush had in mind. Democracy needed to be introduced to the Iraqis slowly. You do not give a new born a steak dinner. You give the infant pablum initially.

Meanwhile, the socialist democrats are doing all in their power to make sure that our men and women taste defeat in Iraq. Oh, I know that they say "We Support The Troops." Tell me, Mr. and Mrs. America, "Do You Believe That?"  I didn't think so.

Make no mistake about it, Al Qaeda loves members of the democrat party. They love these cowards because they know that they can count on democrats to be in their corner. The democrats want us to leave Iraq, "With Our Tails Neatly Tucked Between Our Legs." Never mind the fact that millions of people will die in the ensuing bloodletting if we endorse their homicidal plan; and leave Iraq.

Members of the democrat party are thinking of three things when it comes to "Cutting And Running," (1) Embarrass the President, (2) Use the socialist media to forment lies about the President and (3) Use the "Hit And Run Media" to make sure that a democrat is in the White House in 2008: and that the democrats control both Houses of Congress. 

They are betting everything, including the farm, that their strategy will give them all three items on their wish list. So, what happens if America gives them an early Christmas gift? Can you pronounce the word, "Apocalypse?"

I am very serious. If you think for one minute that the IslamoFascists just want us out of Iraq, you have another thought coming. If the IslamoFascists gain full control of Iraq, Iran will cement their relationship with these thugs and killers. Keep in mind, every one seems to be twiddling their thumbs as Iran moves closer and closer to becoming a nuclear power.

When Iran becomes a nuclear power; and make no mistake about it, Iran will get nukes, the IslamoFascists will be given the keys to the Iranian nuclear arsenal. Iran will get the nuclear bomb because their buddies the socialist democrats, will "Dare The President To Go To War With Herr Von Ahmadinejad." The rest of the world will do what it has done in the past, "Look On."

In the meantime, socialist democrats are treating this like a game. This is serious business folks. Who do you think the IslamoFascists will turn their nuclear weapons on? Don't expect the cowards in the democrat party to protect you. They will be Blaming "George Bush." That is all the Hillary Clintons and Chuck Shumers, Harry Reids and Nancy Pelosi's are good at. When it comes to leadership, they are miserable failures.

So, the socialist democrats want out troops out of the Middle East. This is the thanks our Marines and Soldiers get for their blood, sweat and tears.  It doesn't matter to these blood suckers that thousands of our men and women have given the ultimate sacrifice in order for them to live. It doesn't matter that hundreds of our men and women have lost limbs, and other body parts defending not only you and me, but the cowards in the democrat party as well.

They have the audacity to blame George Bush for "Inciting" these fanatics. The old adage, "They Have Eyes, But Can Not See," certainly applies to the socialist democrats. The person who penned this saying had to have had these cowards in mind.

Nancy Pelosi is crowing over the House voting to bring our troops home by March of next year. This idiotic woman lives in a fantasy world. There is no shield that surrounds the United States. But, Pelosi apparently thinks there is. I bet she also believes in the Easter Bunny.

I continue to be amazed over the arrogance of these people in the democrat party. I only hope that the President doesn't give in and sign this ridiculous bill, which is heavily laden with pork, if it makes it to his desk.

I was proud of the President the way that he responded to these cowards who voted for this bill. He stood strong--and spoke very passionately about the cause that we face as Americans.

I only wished that the President had started taking on these "Haters" years ago.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM