The Truth

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Seymour Hersh calls himself a journalist. However, these days Hersh is noted for leaking confidential information to our enemies.

It is reported that recently this "America Hater" went on Iranian radio and opened his diarrhetic mouth, telling the Iranians about Washington's alleged plans to launch a preemptive strike against this triad of the axis of evil. Blabber mouth Hersh says the President has ordered the Pentagon to come up with a plan that includes bombing Iran. Hersh says the plan could be implemented within twenty four hours notice.

Hersh who calls himself an investigative reporter, says the planning took place at the highest level of our military. Reportedly, the plan calls for bombing Iranian nuclear sites; and other locations that may be involved in the training of Shia militant forces in Iraq.

The question is why isn't this guy in jail?  Experts on the 1st Amendment say Hersh is well within his rights to discuss issues that he feel are vital to the American public; even though he discussed these issues on Iranian radio. These same experts say that the person feeding Hersh this confidential information could be arrested. Persons with access to this information must be in possession of a Top Secret Clearance.

Although leaks have been pouring out of this Bush White House like a sift for years, no one has ever been caught. Never mind indictments.

The larger question as I see it, is why would someone leak such sensitive information to a loud mouth like Seymour Hersh? I mean after all, we are dealing with the potential lives of myriad Americans. And it is obvious that this moron doesn't care about the lives of innocent Americans. Further, it is clear that he is not a patriot: at least, as far as I am concerned. A patriot is someone who performs a patriotic act that is clearly designed to help his/her country, not that individual. Hersh is only looking out for himself. This is the zenith of selfishness; not to mention, the height of hatred for his country.

There is no way that anyone could argue in a cogent fashion that what Seymour Hersh is doing is good for America. Let's face it, fifty years ago, this guy would have been rode out of town on a rail, accompanied with tars and feathers. However, we are faced with a new day in America. We have people like John kohn-Kerry meeting with the enemy in Syria and Iran. The interesting thing is that President Bush could have had this arrogant elitist arrested, using the Logan Act. However, Bush again, sat back and allowed Kohn-Kerry and others in the socialist democrat party embarass him. In the meantime, he continues to try to convince these people to like him.

The mores of Americans have changed in many parts of this country. Unbeknownst to many parents, their children are being indoctrinated with the views of socialists and communists in our "Public Schools." Our colleges and universities are a hotbed for the activities of communists and other radical groups. Leading the charge are wackos like Ward Churchill--who is preaching the false doctrine that "America Blew Up The Twin Towers In New York."

It is fashionable in many circles today to show your disdain for America. Forget the fact that this is the only country many of these bozos have. Let me be clear, I am not arguing against a healthy debate over American policy. I think that is good. However, you cross the line when you start cozying up next to the enemy and revealing to these IslamoFascists, America's military secrets. You cross the line when you start expounding communist views.

There is a limit to free speech. The United States Supreme Court has declared that free speech does not entitle you to "Shout Fire" in a crowded theatre. Conversely, I do not believe that free speech is extended to people like Seymour Hersh, especially when he hobnobs with the enemy. Hersh is doing all that is within his power to bring about the demise of the United States of America. I wonder if he understands what he is doing? Or is his hatred for this country that deep? If his hatred is that great for America, I would be the first to take up a collection to help him relocate to Iran.

I do not wish to see a weakening of the 1st Amendment. However, it is my considered opinion that Seymour Hersh has gone beyond the pale this time. He needs to be reigned in, "Mr. President."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Prior to becoming a clinical psychologist, I worked as a broadcast journalist. I had the good fortune to interview such luminaries as Presidents, Reagan, Carter, and Gerald Ford. I also interviewed the former Secretary of State, Dr. Henry Kissinger, and the late Vice-President and New York Governor, Nelson Rockefeller

Being an old time journalist, I was taught to go beyond the rudiments of journalism:unlike today's "Divas and Superstars Of Journalism."  Not only was I taught how to write in a clear and concise manner: I was also taught how to use use my voice, paying close attention to my diction and enunciation.

I was also taught how to read body language. Perhaps most importantly, I was taught how to spot "A Phoney Politician." Carter was the biggest phoney of the aformentioned Presidents. If you look deep into this man's eyes, you can see that he is not genuine. You can also feel the weakness of Jimmy Carter. He would later demonstrate his weakness in an ample way during the Iran crisis.

We now come to John Edwards, or as he is affectionately called by some, "The Breck Girl." Apparently, he received this "Pet" name because he spends an inordinate amount of time in front of the mirror preening, "Like A Female."

Edwards is attempting to sell the American people on the notion that he loves his country, and he wants to give up his valuable time, "Serving As Our Next President." I can't comment on his thoughts concerning America, however, I can say that it is my opinion that this guy is as phoney as they come.

I have written in the past that my heart goes out to his wife, Elizabeth Edwards. This brave woman is battling incurable cancer. This disease has now metastasized in Mrs. Edwards body. Anyone with heart, would feel nothing but great empathy for this courageous woman. However, her husband, well, this character is a totally different story.

The socialist press has had nothing short of a "love in" with the Edwards since it was announced that her cancer had returned. For reasons that God only knows, the Edwards had to go before television cameras last week to make their announcement to the public. There was nothing in either's affect that moved me "To Tears." Oh, I don't doubt that Mrs. Edwards will succumb to her disease one day. But guess what, "You Will Also Die One Day." You may even die before Elizabeth Edwards. So, why the need for the Edwards to do what they did? To enlighten us about cancer? Maybe you are like me, I don't need a lesson on cancer from the Edwards. I have experienced this disease first hand, through the death of my maternal grandmother.

Therefore, contrary to what democrat strategist Bob Schrum says, the Edwards discussing the issue of cancer will "not make Americans more aware of this disease." I thought that Schrum's comments were very condescending to the American people. But, what else is new? The man is a democrat!

Meantime, the socialist press has tip-toed around the question of whether the Edwards are playing "Politics." I believe that Elizabeth Edwards loves her husband with all of her heart. I also believe that she will do anything in the world for this man: and that includes being duped into pulling at the heart strings of Americans. Remember, John Edwards is a crafty trial lawyer. He made his fortune, "Suing Insurance Companies." In some of the cases that he represented, Edwards "spoke for the deceased victims," during his closing arguments. Yeah, this scoundrel is a convincing man. The question is, did he convince his wife to make her announcement on national television for partisan political reasons? I truly hope not.

In a column last week, I questioned why didn't Edwards quit the campaign in order to stay at home with his wife. Conservative commentator, Laura Ingraham, a cancer survivor herself, wondered, why should Edwards stay at home? Ms. Ingraham added that when she was battling for her life, she went to work everyday. Well Laura, John Edwards is independently weathy. I doubt if he will ever spend all of the money that he has amassed, during his lifetime. And I doubt if Ms. Ingraham is independently wealthy. 

In all fairness to Ms. Ingraham, she said that she went to work--because her work helped her to stay sane. I doubt if John Edwards has to stay on the campaign trail in order to maintain his sanity. If that is the case, what will he do once he is ousted from the race? I'd suggest that he be placed on suicide watch.

 John Edwards is a true solid gold phoney.  Edwards says he wants to "Serve His Country As President." I'll tell you something, if this guy is elected President, we are in for a long, bumpy ride. Here are some facts on John Edwards that the socialist press will not tell you about.

His liberal interest group rating for 2003 was pegged at 94.5%. That rating moved John Edwards ahead of such socialist democrats like, Ted Kennedy and Barbara Boxer. Now, that should tell you something about Edwards. If you can be a bigger liberal than Kennedy or Boxer, then America, you should be scared, very scared. 

During the 108th Congress, which was in 2004, Edwards cast votes for the following:

* Reauthorization of the assault weapons ban

* To restore pay as you go rules, which would create a 60-vote point of order against any direct spending or revenue legislation that would increase the on budget deficit or cause an on budget deficit. Tax cuts and new entitlement spending would have to be offset with revenue increases or spending cuts

* Single victim version of unborn victims of violence act

* Against final passage of unborn victims of violence act

Liberal John Edwards record also shows that he voted for, (1) McCain/Feingold campaign finance bill, (2) He voted against repealing the marriage penalty tax law, (3) Edwards voted for abortion rights, (4) He voted against banning partial birth abortions, (5) John Edwards voted against reducing federal taxes, and finally, (6) Liberal John Edwards voted in favor of dismissing impeachment charges against one, William Jefferson Clinton.

What have we learned about John Edwards? For one, he is a tax and spend liberal. This means if Edwards is elected, he will do what democrats are good at, "Taking Our Money." We have also learned that this man is not a big fan of the middle class. Finally, we have learned that Edwards is a proponent of squashing free speech. This is what McCain/Feingold is all about.

A footnote: John Edwards is not a supporter of the 2nd Amendment. And he is no friend of our men and women in uniform.

America, we can do better than, "John Edwards."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

An entire U.S. Marine Unit has been ordered to leave Afghanistan after the Leathernecks were accused of shooting and killing civilians.

The alleged shootings took place after a suicide bomber driving an explosive rigged minivan, crashed into a convoy of Marines operating in the area of Nangahar province on March 4. The Marines reported that following the explosion, they came under intense small arms fire. The Marines returned fire as they sought to exit the embattled area.

Reports say at least 10 Afghans were killed and another 34 were wounded "By The Marines Gunfire." The Associated Press, no friend of the U.S. military, reported wounded Afgans told the A-P that the Marines indiscriminately fired on civilian cars and pedestrians as they, the Marines, fled the area.

Meantime, U.S. military officials say that "Militant Gunmen" shot at the Marines, "And May Have Caused Some Of The Civilian Casualties." "May Have Caused Some Of The Casualties?" Come on guys, give me a break. Our men get caught in an ambush: and they do what they are trained to do, however, the politicians who have micro-managed this war from the very start, punish our brave Marines. This nonsense has to stop--otherwise, what the hell are we doing in Afghanistan or Iraq for that matter?  Face it, this is one of the main reasons we aren't winning the war against the IslamoFascists. We have to fight this "Neat, Clean War," while the IslamoFascists murder at will: and the world is "Silent" over their overt barbarism.

Meantime, we have fat-butt bureaucrats in D.C. making up ridiculous rules of engagement. And our men and women are supposed to follow this craziness to the letter. But, where are the rules of engagement for the IslamoFascists?

The Marines were ordered out of Afghanistan by Army Major-General Francis G. Kearney III. General Kearney is the head of Special operations Command Central.  Not only did he order the Marines to leave Afghanistan, he is the one who reportedly started the investigation.

When will these pencil pushers learn that we are engaged in a guerrilla war? And when will they stop tying the hands of our brave Marines and Soldiers?

I will tell you, as a former Marine, I have a problem with an Army officer commanding Marines. These folks will never understand the mind-set of a Marine. They will never understand the thinking of a Marine, because they haven't had to go through hell to earn the title of "United States Marine."

Marine Major, Cliff Gilmore confirmed that the 120 man unit had been ordered out of the country. However, he said because of security reasons, he could not divulge where the Marines were headed.

Aghan President Hamid Karzai condemned the shootings. That's the spirit. Condemn our guys--although all of the facts are not in. Condemn our guys for bringing democracy to your country, Mr. Karzai. The U.S. military is the reason why Karzai is "President Of Afghanistan." Talk about biting the hand that feeds you. Karzai's words will surely mean that some of the Marines heads will roll. Washington will have to do something to make this guy happy. Someone's head will be served up on a platter, make no mistake about it.

Then we have this moron, Lt. Colonel, Lou Leto, a spokesman for Army Major General, Kearney. Leto said of the Marines:

"They created perceptions (that) have really damaged the relationship between the local population and this unit. Therefore, the general felt it was best to move them out of that area"

I wonder if this idiot Leto would have been happier if our guys had withheld their fire--and were subsequently killed, simply because they didn't want to risk shooting civilians? War is nasty. War is hell. In war, we have what is called "Collateral Damage." That's just the way that it is. And there is no escaping that fact.

All of these Monday morning quarterbacks would have caused us to loose World War II. What, with their second guessing our men on the front lines. Think about that for a minute.

The reason why we are losing the war in Iraq is because of people like this Major General Francis H. Kearney III. Our men have to fight the IslamoFascists with one hand behind their back: and an eye on people like Kearney who is ready to say, "Bring In The Guilty Bastard," even before all of the evidence is culled together.

We are a blessed nation to have brave young men and women willing to enlist in an all volunteer military. What they don't need are people like General Kearney breathing down their necks.

Hey general, how about praising our guys instead of looking to wreck their lives?

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

A truncated message to socialist democrats: We are not fighting a "Conventional War In Iraq Or Afghanistan."

We are engaging the IslamoFascists in guerrilla warfare. Mr. Webster describes guerrilla warfare in this manner:

"The use of surprise raids, sabotage, etc., by small, mobile groups of irregular forces operating in enemy-held territory"

Let's process the above definition for those dullard individuals in the socialist democrat party. A surprised raid does not have to lend itself to just a small army. A surprised raid could involve a single individual: for example, a coward strapped with explosives who enters a restaurant and blows himself up, along with everyone else: or an insurgent who gets behind the wheel of a car, selects a target of opportunity, and blows himself to kingdom come, taking as many innocent people that he/she can with their pathetic ass.

Sabotage has been seen in Iraq. For example, the bombing of oil pipe lines: designed to disrupt the flow of oil; and the subsequent flow of currency needed for the Iraqi people.

The insurgents operating in the Iraqi theatre are indeed irregular fighters. They do not wear uniforms; and most of those fighting members of the coalition are reportedly from different countries in the Middle East, and Africa.

Socialist democrats understand full well, that this is an unconventional war. They have to know this. They also understand that ferreting out the cowards who fight against our men are women is a difficult task. Socialist democrats have given the American people the impression that if they had a democrat in the White house; and if they controlled both Chambers of the House with a huge majority, they would have won the war on terror by now.  

That type of thinking is easily refuted. First of all, democrats do not have the stomach for war. Secondly, they have a history of placing the lives of Americans in harms way in order to amass votes. Remember, "Slick Willie" did virtually nothing during the 1990's to fight the growing Islamofascists threat. Despite what Clinton says, "He Alone Is Responsible For Osama Bin Laden" still having the strength to draw his next breath. "BJ Clinton" could have taken OBL down, but he elected not to. So, I would recommend that you discount what this "Pathological Liar" says regarding his "Trying" to kill Bin Laden.

George Bush has made some giantic blunders in the fight against the IslamoFascists. I do not believe that there are very many people who would disagree with this assessment. He is responsible for tying the hands of our men--thus preventing them from fighting a full fledged war against these 12th century savages.

If Bush had declared "Martial Law" as soon as our men secured Baghdad, I doubt very seriously if we would have the mess that we are currently witnessing. When you go to war, there should be no doubt about your mission, objective, and goals. Bush was clear on the mission--however, he had no clue about his objectives and goals for Iraq, once this country was under the control of the coalition.

What ensued was chaos--mayhem--and more chaos and mayhem. A simple declaration of martial law could have headed off what we now see in the embattled country known as Iraq. The imposition of martial law would have meant:

* Curfews

* No weapons in the hands of non-military people

* Absolutely "No" militia groups

* No demonstrations

* Perhaps most importantly, "Shut" the country of Baghdad down for six months. That means, no driving, no bicyling, "Nothing" that the cowardly insurgents could use to transport their packages of death

* Shoot to kill "Anyone" violating the rules of martial law

* Seal off the Iraqi borders with her neighbors in Iran and Syria

Why the harsh treatment? Simply put, the Iraqi people were not ready for the type of democracy that George W. Bush had in mind. Democracy needed to be introduced to the Iraqis slowly. You do not give a new born a steak dinner. You give the infant pablum initially.

Meanwhile, the socialist democrats are doing all in their power to make sure that our men and women taste defeat in Iraq. Oh, I know that they say "We Support The Troops." Tell me, Mr. and Mrs. America, "Do You Believe That?"  I didn't think so.

Make no mistake about it, Al Qaeda loves members of the democrat party. They love these cowards because they know that they can count on democrats to be in their corner. The democrats want us to leave Iraq, "With Our Tails Neatly Tucked Between Our Legs." Never mind the fact that millions of people will die in the ensuing bloodletting if we endorse their homicidal plan; and leave Iraq.

Members of the democrat party are thinking of three things when it comes to "Cutting And Running," (1) Embarrass the President, (2) Use the socialist media to forment lies about the President and (3) Use the "Hit And Run Media" to make sure that a democrat is in the White House in 2008: and that the democrats control both Houses of Congress. 

They are betting everything, including the farm, that their strategy will give them all three items on their wish list. So, what happens if America gives them an early Christmas gift? Can you pronounce the word, "Apocalypse?"

I am very serious. If you think for one minute that the IslamoFascists just want us out of Iraq, you have another thought coming. If the IslamoFascists gain full control of Iraq, Iran will cement their relationship with these thugs and killers. Keep in mind, every one seems to be twiddling their thumbs as Iran moves closer and closer to becoming a nuclear power.

When Iran becomes a nuclear power; and make no mistake about it, Iran will get nukes, the IslamoFascists will be given the keys to the Iranian nuclear arsenal. Iran will get the nuclear bomb because their buddies the socialist democrats, will "Dare The President To Go To War With Herr Von Ahmadinejad." The rest of the world will do what it has done in the past, "Look On."

In the meantime, socialist democrats are treating this like a game. This is serious business folks. Who do you think the IslamoFascists will turn their nuclear weapons on? Don't expect the cowards in the democrat party to protect you. They will be Blaming "George Bush." That is all the Hillary Clintons and Chuck Shumers, Harry Reids and Nancy Pelosi's are good at. When it comes to leadership, they are miserable failures.

So, the socialist democrats want out troops out of the Middle East. This is the thanks our Marines and Soldiers get for their blood, sweat and tears.  It doesn't matter to these blood suckers that thousands of our men and women have given the ultimate sacrifice in order for them to live. It doesn't matter that hundreds of our men and women have lost limbs, and other body parts defending not only you and me, but the cowards in the democrat party as well.

They have the audacity to blame George Bush for "Inciting" these fanatics. The old adage, "They Have Eyes, But Can Not See," certainly applies to the socialist democrats. The person who penned this saying had to have had these cowards in mind.

Nancy Pelosi is crowing over the House voting to bring our troops home by March of next year. This idiotic woman lives in a fantasy world. There is no shield that surrounds the United States. But, Pelosi apparently thinks there is. I bet she also believes in the Easter Bunny.

I continue to be amazed over the arrogance of these people in the democrat party. I only hope that the President doesn't give in and sign this ridiculous bill, which is heavily laden with pork, if it makes it to his desk.

I was proud of the President the way that he responded to these cowards who voted for this bill. He stood strong--and spoke very passionately about the cause that we face as Americans.

I only wished that the President had started taking on these "Haters" years ago.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Remember when First Lady, Laura Bush had a skin cancer tumor removed from her right shin last November?

Mrs. Bush decided not to make a big announcement about the removal--saying that it was a private matter. I agreed with the First Lady's decision not to go public. After all, she is not an elected official. However, the socialists press didn't see it that way. Those in the media felt that it was incumbent upon the First Lady to tell them everything about herself. They were hopping mad at the First Lady's taciturn behavior over her health.

Mrs. Bush is a class act. She did not react to these narcissists. Eventually, the story fell off of the radar screen.

Most people know that John Edwards, the lawyer who made millions while chasing ambulances, is running for President. Most people know that his wife Elizabeth has battled cancer in the past. Those of us with a heart, only wish Mrs. Edwards the best in her fight against this terrible disease. Her fight against cancer in my opinion, like Mrs. Bush, is a private matter. Every chemotherapy treatment should not be splashed on the front page of every newspaper in America.

However, her husband, "Who is Running For President," has decided to make the health of his wife, "News." The skeptic in me emerged after hearing that John Edwards planned a noon news conference in Chapel Hill, North Carolina. Mrs. Edwards stood by her husband's side and announced that her cancer had returned. Viewing the live news conference, I found myself asking, "Why Are You Holding A News Conference?" This is a private affair.

While I am sorry to hear this awful news--I felt myself getting angry at John Edwards who said that he planned to continue to "Run For President." Something isn't right, I thought. The man's wife's cancer has spread to her bone--and he seized the opportunity to say that he still planned to seek the democratic presidential nomination. Shouldn't his entire focus be on Mrs. Edwards health? Shouldn't John Edwards quit the campaign in order to be with his wife?

Something is terribly wrong with this picture. Elizabeth Edwards also said that she planned to vigorously campaign for her husband. So, why the news conference? That infernal question kept popping up in my conscious mind.

The skeptic in me says, okay, John Edwards is behind Hillary Rodham-Clinton, and Barrack Obama in the latest polls. Why not "Pull At The Heart Strings of Americans?" Go for the sympathy vote. Remember, this guy did some despicable things in the court room, as he amassed his fortune, "Chasing Ambulances."

With socialist democrats, you have to be fast enough to read the stitches on a football in order to figure out what they are up to. They are crafty little devils. Couple that with being "Shameless, And You Have A Composite Of A Socialist Democrat."

Asked how his wife's sickness would impact on his political future, Edward said that he would continue to campaign. However, in the same breath, he said, "Any Time, Any Place I Need To Be With Elizabeth I Will Be There--Period." Aw, what a loving hubby. I just don't know folks, I smell a rat. I think the socialist press has been used by John Edwards. I hope that his wife was not part of this deal. Personally, I like Mrs. Edwards. I watched as cancer took my loving grandmother away from us. You will never know the pain that a family has to go through, watching as this unsympathetic disease ravages the body of a once healthy individual.

No, I wouldn't wish cancer on anyone. However, if the Edwards are using her illness as a way to gain "Sympathy Votes," then I say shame, shame, shame on them.

I only wished that John Edwards had the common decency to deal with his personal affairs like this, behind closed doors. It is not the business of the socialist press what his wife's health status is. Nor is it yours or mine's.

We as a people have become too damn nosey in this country. We feel that it is our appointed duty to stick our big noses into the affairs of anyone. I find this to be very problematic.

But, I find it even more problematic when public people feel it necessary to "Broadcast In Bulletin Form," the health status of a loved one, to allegedly garner political points.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITALHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Have you noticed how liberals in this country love to portray themselves as being more caring than conservatives?

They pretend to be on the side of the downtrodden: yet, they work feverishly to keep the downtrodden down. Libs are also "Crazy" about their animals. I mean, they don't just love their animals, they are obesssed with them. You even have wackos like Barbara Walters who will tell you that her dog "talks to her." This woman is ready for a long rest: and I think you know where. Here's a clue, the help wears "White Suits, And They Have Nets."

Watch these people sometime. They are noted for kissing their dogs in "The Mouth." What the hell is that all about?And please do not give me that crap that a dog's mouth is cleaner than a humans. By the way, have you ever watched a dog "Clean Him/Herself?" Hell, the animal is simply performing a task that is God given. Again, I must ask why would you kiss a dog in the mouth after watching something like this. These are strange people, folks?

Socialist democrats know that most Americans loathe esoteric thinking. If you want to find out what these people are doing to your country, you have to "Think." Becoming emotional before thinking an issue through is, well, not smart. You will cheat yourself out of performing a sensible counter-argument if you act on emotions alone. America, you must become an esoteric thinker, and stop trusting the words of the socialist press--and people who gravitate to their scary ideology.

You must understand that, long gone are the days when a reporter left his feelings about social issues at home. Today, the socialist press feel that it is their job to, (1) Get into the face of an interviewee, (2) Challenge the word of the person they are interviewing, and (3) Provide you with their thoughts on the relevant issues impacting our country. My Grandmother used to describe people like that as being, "Brazen."

Most Americans have a working I.Q. of 90-109. That places most Americans in the average intellect range. There is nothing wrong with this, however, when you are dealing with bright people like Hillary Rodham-Clinton, Barrack Obamba, John Edwards and so forth, you have got to be quick on your feet. These are crafty rascals who are adept at verbosity. In order to cut through their B.S., you have to listen and next, process their B.S.  So, how do you do this?

First, you need to understand that socialist democrats want to keep you quiet. Again, they pretend to be on your side: and that all they want is a better America. Horse feathers!!! They want to "Control Americans." Remember, these people are "Socialists." Socialists do not believe in sharing or encouraging upward mobility.

Look at the dog and pony show that the socialists have cooked up relative to the eight fired U.S. Attorneys. Never mind the fact that these people serve at the pleasure of the President, regardless of his/her political affiliation. Again, these scoundrels, the democrats, are trying to convince the American people that "They Care." The President was playing right into their dirty little hands. That is, until these hypocrites asked to interview Karl Rove and Harriet Miers "Under Oath." The President drew a line in the sand, and in essense said if it is war that these socialists want, then he will give them a war that they will not soon forget.

Keep in mind, Mr. and Mrs. America, it was the socialists democrats who promised that there would be a new day in Washington, when they took control of the House of Representatives. There is a new day: we now have investigations instead of legislation. The republicans tried this in the 1990's, and they lost seats in the congress because of their need to investigate. The arrogant socialists have not learned from the republicans mistake.

So now, a House panel has approved subpoenas for the President's top political advisor, Karl Rove and other White House aides. The senate is likely to do the same today. The showdown over the firings of the U.S. Attorneys is now set. If there is no compromise--and the socialist democrats aren't interested in compromise--this entire matter will end up in court.

Meantime, the President has once again assured Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez that he has his support. The President continues to insist that the firings were legal, and that there was no hidden political agenda to get rid of the now controversial eight.

White House press secretary, Tony Snow summed it up brilliantly:

"The question they've got to ask themselves(socialist democrats) is, are you more interested in a political spectacle than getting the truth"

Of course the knuckleheaded democrats are interested in a political spectacle. Linda Sanchez, democrat from California and subcommittee chair said, "There must be accountability."

Folks, this is much to do about nothing; and the socialist democrats know it. This is all about 2008, and who will control 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue; and who will control both Houses of Congress.

The socialist democrats are hoping to paint the President as being politically corrupt. Listen carefully, as they try to associate the President with "Watergate."

They have their water carriers in the "Hit And Run Media" ready to do their bidding. Do not expect these lackeys to give you but one side of the story, the socialist democrat side.

As I see it, the President has to stand firm, and point out the hypocriscy of the democrats. Mr. Bush and his team of bright people must satuarate the air waves with their message.

Their message must be strong and clear for Mr. and Mrs. America. Otherwise, the socialists democrats will "Eat Their Lunch."

Mr. Bush must also stop trying to placate these mean-spirited people. Believe me, Bill Clinton would not bend over backwards for a republican lead congress.

Finally, the people must speak up: and let the hypocrites in the democrat party know that they can see through their political charade.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

The King James version of the Bible warns us to "Beware Of Wolves In Sheeps Clothing."

The socialist press is reporting that "Christians" took to the streets of our Nation's Capital this past weekend--protesting against the war in Iraq. The socialist press also stated that "thousands" took part in the protest. The protesters had promised 30,000 would turn out in D.C. However, that number never materialized.

When that didn't happen, the socialist press went to plan "B" and said, "thousands were out protesting." Again, you have to be quick on the uptake, in order to catch these weasels at their game of "Lying."  And that is what the socialist press is doing folks, make no mistake about it, they have stooped so low that they are now lying to the American people. They are like an illusionist--using sleight of hand manuevers.

When the socialist press say that thousands rallied in D.C., I would ask, how many thousands of people were actually there? We now know that the protesters, many of them socialists and communists fell way short of their expected 30,000. So, how many of these worthless cretins showed up? My guess would be less than ten thousand.

Notice, I called these so-called christians, "worthless Cretins?" Personally, I do not believe that they are christians. However, using the moniker of christian, gives a benign sound to their overall intentions. Remember, the bible also says the "Devil Can Change Himself Into An Angel Of Light." So, it comes as no surprise that these socialists and communists would pretend to be "Christians." Unmasking them is rather easy.

As usual, the socialist press showed that it was not interested in providing us with the truth. For example, who were the religious leaders of these so-called "Christian Protesters?" Why weren't they interviewed? Why didn't we see them at the podium speaking in D.C.? Maybe it was my tired old eyes, but I didn't even see "The Reverend Jackson--or "The Reverend Sharpton" at the anti-war demonstration. Now, that is a first, these two hot dogs eschewing television cameras.

"Grieving War Mom" Cindy Sheehan was at the protest. Remember, this is the same woman who embraces the communist dictator, Fidel Castro, and his pudgy lackey, Hugo Chavez. She is also the same bomb thrower who spouts off anti-semitic remarks. Yeah, Cindy Sheehan is a true "Christian." Just like I am "Santa Claus," writing this column from the North Pole.

The socialist press can't seem to get enough from this ignorant woman. Listen to these pearls of wisdom:

"We're here in the shadow of the war machine. It's like being in the shadow of the death star." They take their death and destruction and they export it around the world. We need to shut it down"

What a sweetheart: and a "Real American, Huh?" The woman is a joke. She is a pawn, and she lacks the good sense to realize that she is being used by socialists and communists to attack her own country. She is being used by these hate mongers to help bring about the demise of the United States of America. And this "Airdome" lacks the intelligence to see what her "buddies are doing."

The Associated Press reported that there were counter-demonstrations to "The Christians Protest." The A-P said the counter-protesters were sizeable in number--but, unlike their report on the anti-war zealots, A-P didn't bother to give an estimate on the number of those in the ranks of the counter-protesters.  Do you have any idea why? Could it be there were "Thousands" of counter-demonstrators? Just something for you to think about.

What I couldn't figure out was why were the Spanish marching in Madrid, protesting against our involvement in Iraq? The cowardly Prime Minister of Spain quickly pulled that country's troops out of Iraq, after he was elected PM. So, what is their problem? They showed Al-Qaeda that they were cowards; and that they could be bullied around by the IslamoFascists.

And to think that thousands of Spaniards have the nerve to tell us how to conduct our foreign policy. Memo to the protesters in Spain: "Continue To Be Good Little Pantywaists, And Shut Up." On your request to close Guantanamo Bay, "Put An Egg In Your Shoe, And Beat It." The nerve of those cowards.

The kooks who marched in our country are trying like hell to make Iraq like Vietnam. It is not the same. Once we left Vietnam, that was the end of our involvement with that country. Personally, I thought that what we did to the Vietnamese people was despicable. Once the commies rolled in and took control of the country--thousands of innocent people were put to death.

Let us not forget what Pol Pot did in Cambodia after that government lost our military support. Pol Pot took control of the capital of Cambodia, Phnom Pehn in 1975. His Khmer rouge immediately established slave labor camps. It is estimated that 1.5 million people died while in these labor camps, also known as "Killing Fields."

You libs out there will remember the poignant movie, "The Killing Fields." In the movie, those in the slave labor camps were given one tin of rice, or to say it another way, 180 grams of rice "every other day." Many of the dead, died from starvation, mal-nutrition and disease.

Remember, it was the "Liberals" in this country who demanded that we "Get Out Of Vietnam." It is the "Liberals" who have the blood of 1.5 million cambodians on their hands. But wait, these people who claim to be concerned about death, are setting the stage for yet another "Killing Fields."

What do you suppose will happen if the United States pulled out of Iraq as Nancy Pelosi, Hillary Rodham-Clinton, John Murtha, John Kohn-Kerry, Ted Kennedy, Harry Reid, Chuck Shumer, et.al would like us to do? That region would explode. But, that doesn't bother the libs and their friends in the socialist press. They only worry abou the death of those in our military, right? Sure they do.

These cruel hearted people who are calling for our "Redeployment From Iraq" would make the late Pol Pot smile, because there is a Pol Pot in Iraq, biding his time, waiting for us to leave the poor Iraqi people on their own:the same way we left the South Vietnamese.

How people like Nancy Pelosi can live with themselves is beyond me. They have no shame--and they lack empathy. The aforementioned people are playing with the lives of millions of Iraqi and Americans as well.

Make no mistake about it, if we leave Iraqi, the IslamoFascists will murder the Iraqis by the thousands. Once they have satiated themselves off of the blood of their fellow Muslims--they will turn their eyes to the West.

God help us!!!!

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Most intelligent people understand that the socialist press is opposed to the Iraq War. Their reportage is clearly biased against our men and women in uniform--and the United States of America.

One would think that they were the official public relations firm of Al-Qaeda--given the way they report on what is taking place in Iraq. We now stand at the fourth year mark of our involvement in Iraq. The socialist press is marking this anniversary by increasing their negative propaganda about what is taking place in this Middle Eastern country.

I watched the "Today Show" this weekend, and their Baghdad correspondent Tom Aspell, "Lied" to the American people in his propaganda piece for Al-Qaeda. He also used some subliminal techniques in order to embellish upon his lies. I will explain further what I mean by subliminal techniques, later in this write-up.

Aspell noted that two-thirds of the Iraqi people say "That Things Are Getting Worse In Iraq." He said that the elections that were held in Iraq, means very little if people do not feel safe. Mr. Aspell provided the viewers a litany of statistics regarding how many Americans were killed/wounded in Iraq recently. Next, he gave us a total breakdown of the number of dead and wounded Americans over the past four years. Aspell also had to discuss how much money has been spent to fight the terrorists. He reminded us that the war in Iraq has lasted longer than World War II. Why the need to discuss the war's longevity? I'll tell you why. To form doubt in the minds of Americans.

The President was seen in his report, dressed in a flight suit, and addressing our men and women on a navy ship. The sound bite was short, so you had to pay very close attention. The President said that "Major Combat Had Ended In Iraq."  Aspell had to quickly remind us that the fighting continues despite the words of Mr. Bush four years ago. The words of the President were fused together to make him look like an "Idiot." His last word, "Ended" was chopped off quickly, so as to deny the President any qualifying remarks. That Mr. Aspell, was a cheap shot. But, perhaps the cheapest shot was Aspell showing that infamous banner declaring, "Mission Accomplished."

Aspell knows damn well that the President had "Nothing" to do with the installation of the banner. Yet, the subliminal message was sent out. It reminds Americans that our men and women continue to die in Iraq. Remember, the socialist media continues to hammer home that the war in Iraq has lasted longer than World War II.

These morons have got to know that World War II was a totally different war. The enemy was clearly defined:and there were front lines. America's fighting men did not have to deal with cowards dressed in civilian clothes one minute; and later picking up a weapon to be used against our military, the way that the insurgents are doing in Iraq.

We are engaged in guerrilla warfare. Vietnam showed us that it is difficult to root out an enemy employing guerrilla tactics. The socialist media knows this. However, they are banking on their lies to help them galvanize the American people to demand that congress stop funding the war. Thus far, the majority of the American people have said no such thing. But, we know that if the American people are given a steady diet of negativism, they will buckle and do what the socialists want them to do. Witness what happened during the last mid-term elections.

The Associated Press said in its report entitled, "Iraq War/Entering Year Five" that republicans lost congress because "of voter angst over the conflict." Not true, the republicans lost control of the congress because the socialist press saw fit to report negative story after negative story about Iraq. Many of these cowardly reporters filed their reports from tha balconies of their hotel. They were too afraid to venture out into the streets of Baghdad. To say that the American people were not getting the truth on the war would be a major understatement. However, there was a method to the madness of the socialist press. They were and remain, "Anti-War." Remember, Meredith Viera of the "Today Show," said she proudly marched in an anti-war protest.

The socialist democrats are playing politics with the war. They could end the war today. Simply, vote to cut off funding for the war. But, they haven't the nerve to do no such thing. They know that the public does not support cutting off funding to our troops. So, like little dogs nibbling at the heels of passersby, these polititical chihuahuas are a pain in the posterior of the President. If you think about it, all that you hear from socialist democrats is, "Yap, Yap, Yap." And "Let's Investigate This, Let's Investigate That." But Hey, you voted for these ridiculous people, "Mr. And Mrs. America."

With the help of the socialist press, members of the democrat party are trying to liken the war in Iraq to the Vietnam War. This war is totally different. To the best of my knowledge, no Vietnamese National ever flew a plane into an American building. The Viet Cong and North Vietnames Regulars, a powerful fighting force, "Did Not Have Cells Around The World:" awaiting orders to engage in mayhem against the United States of America.

This is something the hardheaded socialists do not seem to get. The IslamoFascists are hell-bent on our destruction. They do not want to talk. They wish to destroy us. This message resonates with millions of my fellow Americans--however, this concept is foreign to liberal socialists.

I never in my life time expected to see or hear Americans praying for our defeat. What is the socialist press doing when it gives us a steady drum beat of how many Americans have died in the War? What are they saying when they dig up nothing but negative stories? What are they telling us when they can find "NOT ONE DAMN AMERICAN WAR HERO?" The answer is quite simple, these Benedict Arnolds are "Praying For Our Defeat."

We know that these people couldn't care less about death. For if they cared so much about death, they would report on the thousands of African-Americans mostly males,  who die in the inner cities of America every year from gunfire. If they cared about death, they would report on the thousands of Americans who die at the hands of doctors each year in, "licensed hospitals." If they cared so much about death, they would report over and over, the number of young people who get intoxicated, get into a car and crash it--and end up killiing themselves and innocent drivers.

No, these hypocrites couldn't care less about death. This is what galls me when I hear report after report about the number of dead in Iraq.

Someone needs to tell these hypocrites that in war, "People Die." Someone also needs to tell these boldfaced liars to report on the number of insurgents that have been killed by our boys in the last four years. Trust me, the deaths of our men and women would dwarf the number of insurgents that have been killed and wounded.

But, make no mistake about it, the socialist press is "No Friend Of Our Military." They are only pretending To be.

There is an old southern saying. "You Come To Me Wishing To Shake My Hand, However, In Your Other Hand That Is Tucked Neatly Behind Your Back, You Hold A Rock."

That my friend is today's socialist press and democrat party. They are modern day, Judas Iscariot's

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Michael Bloomberg, the Mayor of New York City has been traversing the country trying to sell other city Mayors to join him in his gun-grabbing scheme. Bloomberg is of the opinion that individual citizens do not have the right to bear arms. That says the Mayor, falls within the purview of the police and military. Apparently, the Mayor's eye sight fails him when it comes to reading the 2ND Amendment to the Constitution.

A madman went on the prowl in the Mayor's city on Wednesday night. Thirty-two year old David Gavin entered a Greenwich Village pizzeria around 9pm. He reportedly asked for a menu; then he pulled out a 9mm handgun and shot a pizza worker in the back "Fifteen Times."  Gavin then calmly left the store after the grissly murder.

Once outside the store, Gavin was confronted by two auxillary police officers. He quickly shot Nicholas Todd Pekearo and Eugene Marshalik to death. See, he was able to do this because in New York City, auxillary police officers "do not have the right to be armed." Correct, Mayor Bloomberg?

I have no idea as to what Pekearo and Marshalik were thinking. This is not the 1920's when just the sight of a badge caused thugs to "think." Approaching an armed individual who has just murdered someone--with just your barehands is just suicidal. Using the latest pop psychology techniques on creeps like this won't work. They are mad killers. They are just as deadly as any animal that you will find in the jungles of Africa. You have got to fight fire with fire when dealing with sociopaths like this.

Thanks to Mayor Bloomberg and his parochial thinking regarding guns, these men are dead. By the way, Gavin was gunned down by police who responded minutes later "with guns drawn." Police say this criminal not only possessed a 9mm handgun: he was also in possession of a .380 semiautomatic pistol; along with 100 rounds of ammunition. This psychopath was on a mission. He wanted a "War."

People like Bloomberg like to seize opportunities like this to discuss why we need "sensible gun control laws." Never mind the fact that the City of New York has some of the toughest gun laws in the nation. Bloomberg and people like him live in a fantasy world. They truly believe that they can rid America of guns. Actually, the only people who would give up their guns would be legal citizens. I keep saying this, "Criminals Will Always Have Guns." Are you listening Mayor Bloomberg?

Hell, crack-cocaine is illegal. Yet, millions of Americans have access to this illicit drug. Why is this? The criminal mind is always one step ahead of law enforcement. A total gun ban would be no different. Nonetheless, this obvious fact seems to elude the billionaire, dunderheaded Mayor of New York City.

If these two young officers had weapons at their disposal, there is a good chance they would be going home to their families tonight. No Mayor Bloomberg, you will not get away with blaming guns for this terrible tragedy. It is people like you who are responsible for the deaths of Nicholas Todd Pekearo and Eugene Marshalik. You don't feel that we have the common sense or the expertise to use a weapon. It is your belief that the police should be there to protect us. Sure, but we little people can't find a cop when we need one.

Last week, a Federal Court in the Nation's Capital, told City Fathers that their ban against citizens owning guns was unconstitutional. The time is ripe for the good citizens of New York City to take their lying politicans to court, and take back their Constitutional rights.

Protecting one's self and family is innate. We are born with the gift of self preservation--and most of us will fight like hell to survive. We will survive, by any means necessary. But, Bloomberg and other effeminate politicians like him want to remove this right from our DNA. It is all about control, ladies and gentlemen. We are the serfs; and people like Bloomberg are the Lords and Barons.

On Wednesday night, two of our wonderful serfs were brutally murdered: and "Lord Bloomberg Is Responsible For Their Deaths." I hope you sleep well tonight, "Your Honor."

I'm sure their families are comforted knowing that their loved ones will received a "Full Police Funeral An, And American Flag."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

I am outraged at Hispanic Civil Rights Groups in this country. They have "Hung One Of Their Own Out To Dry."

Not a single group has stepped forward in support of embattled U.S.Attorney General, Alberto Gonzalez. These people have truly shown who they are. They are like Black Civil Right Groups who eschew Black Republicans in their time of need. If Gonzalez had been a democrat--you can bet that every Latino group in this country would have been screaming at the top of their lungs. Yet, these sycophants have been silent in the wake of the democrats move to politicize the firing of eight U.S. Attorneys by Gonzalez's office.

And that is what it is folks, the democrats are attempting to politicize every issue that the "Hit And Run Media" can gain any traction out of regarding the Bush administration. This is all about the 2008 Presidential election. The democrats are trying to convince the public that the Bush Administration is incompent--and without ethics. Meantime, although the democrats control both chambers of the House, all that they have been able to do thus far is "Whine." Has anyone noticed this? They continue to use the same old tired tactic of "Blame Bush." However, what credible alternatives have they placed on the table regarding the issues facing America? I can tell you, "Zip, Nada, Not A Damn Thing." However, they are experts at crying like little babies.

I watched the Hispanic morning show, "Despierta America" this morning. This obviously liberal station did not package the Gonzalez story. Imagine that? A package is a complete story, with the reporter coming to the audience from the field. Interviews are part of the story(package).

Latinos attempt to present to the public this united front. Keep in mind that Gonzalez was on all of the major "Gringo" networks--but not Despierta America. The "News Announcer" did perform a "desker" on Gonzalez. A desker is where the "news reader" reads a short story on a news item. Why wasn't this a major news story for Despierta America? It is simple, Despierta America and the rest of the media is in the tank for the democrat party.

The people at Despierta America should be ashamed of themselves. Hispanic groups in this country should equally be ashamed of themselves. Gonzalez is the first Latino to sit in the Attorney General's chair. You would think that Hispanics around the world would be proud. Apparently not, because Gonzalez is in the "wrong political party." It saddens me to say this--but Hispanics like their Black counterparts are on "The Democrat Political Plantation." They take their marching orders from socialists liberal European-Americans.

Do you think that Chuck Shumer would have the gall to call for the resignation of Alberto Gonzalez if this partisan hack thought that Hispanics would rise up? Not on his life. Shumer knows which direction the political winds blow in. This political harlot would sell his soul for a vote. No, Shumer was given the green light from his people to attack Mr. Gonzalez.

Shumer better not hold his breath waiting for Gonzalez to resign. This is what the Attorney General had to say on the matter of his stepping down:

"I work for the American people and serve at the pleasure of the president. I think you can look at the record of the department in terms of what we've done--going after child predators, public corruption cases. I think our record is outstanding"

Shumer is not the only democrat calling for the scalp of Alberto Gonzalez. Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards have also issued a call for Gonzalez to resign. Do you smell politics?

Apparently, Hillary doesn't remember her husband "FIRING ALL" of the AG's when he took office. Bush took a more tactful approach. He even kept Clinton appointees after he took office. The president could have repeated what Clinton had done earlier. That is his right, folks. These people "serve at the pleasure of the president."

I wonder if Hillary Clinton, John Edwards or Chuck Shumer have fired staffers? I bet they have. But, these political opportunists say the president can't do the same thing. Now, that takes nerve.

Out of all of these phoneys, it is Hillary Rodham Clinton who makes me want to regurgitate the most. On ABC News, she said:

" The buck should stop somewhere. The president needs to be very forthcoming--what did he say, what did he know, what did he do?

She even went a step further by saying that Karl Rove "owes the Congress and the country an explanation for his role in the affair"

Memo to Hillary Rodham Clinton. President Bush doesn't "Micromanage" his people the way that you do. He doesn't not suffer from Obsessive Compulsive Personality Disorder. People with this disorder feel that things are not perfect until they do them. Hillary Clinton is so transparent.

Meantime, Gonzalez has admitted that misakes were made in the handling of the firing of the U.S. attorneys. Not good enough for the democrat party. They want a pound of flesh and then some.

The president has told the democrats to go suck on a lemon. He said that Mr. Gonzalez will stay put.

George W. Bush is loyal to those who work for him.

Chuck Shumer, Hillary Rodham Clinton and John Edwards would do well to emulate the president. Americans can see through their hypocrisy. But then, they can't be like the president: you have to have "Class" to be like George W. Bush.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Well, the "Chickens Have Come Home To Roost" for Speaker Of The House, Nancy Pelosi.

Pelosi is getting some of the treatment that George Bush has received from the radical group known as Code Pink. Pink is being lead by people like Cindy Sheehan. Sheehan is the shameless California woman who has used her heroic son's death to further her shameful political agenda.

Members of Code Pink have been camped outside of the San Francisco home of Ms. Pelosi. The women's group brought their message and mattresses to Pelosi's home last Sunday. They have set up camp on the grounds of the Speaker's home. Radicals from Code Pink say they want to dialogue with Pelosi over the war in Iraq. They feel that Pelosi has not done enough to get our military out of Iraq.

They are demanding that the troops be brought home, "Now." These people aren't smart enough to understand that Pelosi doesn't have the clout to bring about their wishes. Further, they lack the political savvy to understand that Pelosi would sink her party's chances of, (1) staying in control of the House, and (2) Recapturing the White House in "08", should she come across as not supporting the troops.

We all know that she doesn't really support the troops. San Francisco Pelosi is only telling the public what she thinks it wants to hear regarding her stance on our troops. Pelosi is smart enough to not go totally radical on us. But, this is what the radical group, Code Pink wants. One of the radicals from this wacky group offered this comment:

" The point is to keep showing our dissatisfaction. It's hard to do on our own, but I know I speak for millions of people"

Oh, really Ms. Toby Blome, age 51. That is the problem with these radicals. They are delusional. They really think the country supports their socialist agenda. Were that the case, our troops would have been home months ago. If Blome had "Millions Of Americans" supporting her radical group, they would be able to put together a credible demonstration in the nation's capital. But they can"t. No, Ms. Blome, there aren't millions of Americans who support you. It is just the crack-pots who show up at the President's ranch when he is on vacation--and the wackos who are demonstrating in front of Nancy Pelosi's home.

I do support one thing that Code Pink is doing. That is protesting in front of the home of Nancy Pelosi. Although I would encourage these folks to get more protesters out there. Reports say that only three Code Pink members could be spotted as of Monday afternoon.

Not to worry. Code Pink members borrowing a military term, I found that rather interesting, said that "Reinforcements Are On The Way." You need to know that I am chuckling as I write this. So, reinforcement are on the way to "Camp Pelosi." No, I didn't make that name up. This is the name that Code Pink has given to their adopted home.

The radicals vow to "Stay The Course," until the congress votes on a supplemental financing of the war. By the way, Pelosi refuses to meet with Code Pink "At Her Home." I guess Nancy is not "Really Down For The Struggle" after all.

She did issue a terse statement:

"I share the concerns of the protesters about the disastrous war in Iraq, and put the White House on the course of a new direction for the American people"

What new course. Hell, George Bush has just annouced that he's sending additional troops into the Iraqi theater. Attention "General Pelosi," the President is the Commander In-Chief, not you, or John Murtha. This ditzy woman wouldn't know the difference between a battalion and a company. Yet, she thinks she can instruct the President on how to fight a war on terror. The woman is scary. And I'm not just talking about her latest botox treatment either.

I must admit that it is a hell of a lot of fun watching these various radical socialists groups now eat each other. But, that is what "Snakes Do."

It's equally entertaining to watch as "The Chickens Come Home To Roost To The Socialists Democrat Party."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Have you noticed the emphasis that the left wing press has placed on the nit-wits in South America who are protesting against President Bush? Actually, it is not the President that these lunatics are screaming their fool heads off at--it is the people of the United States. However, you wouldn't know it from the reports emanating from the socialist news media.

The protesters "Hate" our country. But, the "Main Stream People," lacks the courage or conviction to go out into the streets and ask these American haters, why are they so angry at us. So, the images that you are presented are pictures of demonstrators with signs showing the President as the Devil--or placards showing the President with blood dripping from his hands. The signs are obviously designed to gain attention.

Keep in mind, these are the same "America Haters" who will risk life and limb to come to this country. Yet, they take to the streets of their third world countries and bash the "Great Satan." The paradox is that these commies want to live here.

They hate us because of our, (1) Freedom, (2) Our standard of living. Contrast that with their pitiful diets: and twenty people living in the same room. Yeah, they hate us because, "We Are The United States Of America." But, my friends I am happy to say, "I'M PROUD TO BE AN AMERICAN."

Meantime, the media is working hand in glove with these communists. Tell me, are you surprised America? If your answer is yes, you have been asleep for too long. I watched the "Today Show" this morning--and its White House correspondent--the woman who looks like "Howdy Doody", Kelly O'Donnell--questioned why hadn't the President talked about Hugo Chavez--and his protests against Mr. Bush? I wondered, why should the President of the most powerful country on the planet give two seconds of thought to this pudgy little communist?

Hugo Chavez is like a small child. He is making noise because he wants the President's attention. I applaud the President for ignoring this mental midget. My only concern is that the President has to breathe in the same air that this animal has to take in. The President should undergo a complete physical as soon as Air Force One touches down in the Nation's Capital.

I have been wondering why is the socialist press playing up the protesters in South America? I mean after all, this is what these pathetic little people do whenever an American President lands on their soil. My answer came rather swiftly to me. The media hates George W. Bush. Any chance that they can stick it to him, they will not hesitate to follow through. The showing of the rag tag bands of protesters is designed to show the world that George Bush is hated around the globe. However, nothing could be further from the truth.

I learned a long time ago as a young reporter that "Images Create Idelogy." So, the images that the world is receiving from the media is one that shows that Bush is loathed in South America. The media is hoping to foster in the minds of the willing, "A Hatred For The President." If you have a better answer, I would love to hear it.

Why do you suppose that the socialists press continues to hammer away at the car bombings in Iraq? Before answering, remember that, "Images Create Idelogy." Their constant bombarment of the psyches of the American people with Iraqi car bombings worked. That is why we have Nancy Pelosi as the Speaker of The House. She certainly is not sitting in the Speaker's Chair because of her intellectual prowess, believe me.

Why do you think the media is constantly telling us about how many American Soldiers and Marines have died in Iraq? In the meantime, we hardly ever hear about dead insurgents. Trust me, these scumbags are dying by the thousands. However, it is not the media's job, at least in their minds, to air a fair and balance report. Their job is to tell you about the latest car bombings, and the latest military fatalities.

Why won't the media tell you how many teenagers die from auto mishaps in "America Each Year?" The answer is simple, the media doesn't really give a damn about deaths. These socialists are just against the war in Iraq. And anytime that they can embarass our men and women in uniform--and the Commander in Chief--these ungrateful slobs will do it.

Now do you understand why the socialists press will print stories about the protesters in South America--and why so-called broadcast news journalists will attend a Hugo Chavez "news conference?"

This is only a working hypothesis, but I believe that more and more Americans are starting to figure out the game the socialists press is playing. When the American public puts it all together, the media as we know it today, will "Die."

It will die because Americans are basically a people with strong ethics and character.

These two wonderful traits left America's newsrooms years ago.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

To borrow a phrase from a western vernacular, it is "High Noon" on the issue of illegal immigration. The time has come to take a stand on what type of nation we will be today--and in the future.

Those on the radical left would like to see America turned into a socialist country. This despite the fact that it has been proven over and over again that socialism does not work. Nonetheless, those on the left are indefatigable in their attempts to change the political landscape in America. Among other things, these deeply entrenched/demented people want, (a) Open borders with Mexico, (b) Gay marriage, (c) A weakening of our military, (d) Legalized drugs, (e) A Parlimentary system of government, and (f) Government subsidized medical care for all citizens. And that is just for starters.

The foci of today's column will not address every issue listed above. Instead, I will concentrate on illegal immigration. The tiny city of Hazleton, Pennsylvania is located in the northeast section of the Keystone state. I have been to Hazleton several times. It is in close proximity to my home in Rochester, New York. When I visited Hazleton, it was a little sleepy city. However, things have changed since my last visit. 

The demographics in Hazleton changed and so did the hue of the people's skin. Hazleton was struck with an influx of Latinos: many of whom were illegal aliens. Town Fathers quickly took note of how Hazleton was changing. It was no longer safe to walk down the streets at night. Their new neighbors were forming gangs, dealing in drugs, and committing violent crimes. The community's culture was crumbling before their very eyes. For the 31,000 residents of Hazleton, this was a serious wake up call.

Town Fathers could have done what other communities heretofore had done--"Nothing." But Hazleton politicians were not going to allow riff-raff to take over their city. They formed plans to fight back. Enter Mayor Lou Barletta, and the culture battle began. Naturally, those on the radical left were quick to involke racism. Isn't that what they normally do when their questionable mores are challenged? However, Mayor Barletta was committed to stop those desiring to destroy the culture of Hazleton. The socialist press in this country aligned themselves with the law breakers. Are you surprised? The socialist press has always attempted to make illegal aliens appear to be the victims.

Mayor Barletta got Town Fathers to pass laws sanctioning landlords who rented to illegal aliens. Businesses were also penalized for hiring illegals. Tenants who rented within the city proper were required to register at City Hall. The left began to howl.

So, the city of Hazleton has been hauled into court by none other than the American Civil Liberties Union and a hosts of Hispanic groups. They have charged the city with stirring up divisiveness and being racist. What was Mayor Barletta thinking? What's wrong with a a little gang-banging, and innocent people being killed in the process? What's wrong with crackheads roaming the city--burglarizing people's homes? What a divisive and racist individual. No, I am not serious about that last statement. That is called satire.

The city of Hazleton will be in Federal court in Scranton, Pennsylvania come Monday morning to answer a complaint that says the city lacks the right to act on its own to curb illegal immigration. Can you believe that? Parenthetically, a number of other cities have now used the Hazleton template for dealing with its illegal aliens. Mayor Barletta declared:

"We're not only fighting for Hazleton, we're fighting for cities all across America"

Here, Here, Your Honor. It should be noted that U.S. District Judge James Munley has put the skids on Hazeton enforcing its laws against illegals. The Judge will issue a ruling at the conclusion of the trial. Nonetheless, many Latinos have left the city of Hazleton--and the businesses that used to cater to them report that their bottom line has suffered. My heart is bleeding for them: and yours should too. Just satire folks, just satire.

As already mentioned, the typical tired rhetoric from the radical left is being used to stoke the political fires in Hazleton. Said Anthony Romero, the national executive director of the ACLU:

"The city of Hazleton is promoting discrimination"

Really? When will the left get it? Americans are tired of the radical left's misuse of the "R" word. The "R" stands for racism for those you south of the border. You can only cry wolf so many times before people stop listening to you.

What is wrong with wanting to have a safe/clean town where people, Lationos and other ethinic groups can raise their children in a safe environment? We have had nearly forty years of the radical left tearing away at the very core of our culture. Our once proud culture is in a bedraggled state, thanks to these insane people.

This writer says, "Thank God for people like Mayor Lou Barletta of Hazleton, Pennsylvania."

The message is very clear. If you want to live in the United States of America; become a legal citizen. Next, learn how to act like a human being: and not someone who was just released from a cage.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH'

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

By now, you have probably heard that the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit has sent the anti-gun movement crowd into a state of panic.

The Federal Appeals Court threw out the District of Columbia's ban against individuals owning handguns. The court thus shot down D.C's bogus argument that the Second Amendment only applies to the military. In a 2-1 ruling, the court said that the activities protected by the Second Amendment:

"Are not limited to militia services, nor is an individual's enjoyment of the right contingent on enrollment in a militia"

The court told fear mongering politicians in D.C. that they have no constitutional right to ban citizens from keeping handguns in their domiciles. This historic ruling also went a step further. The court struck down a ridiculous D.C. law that said citizens had to not only have their firearms registered, but they had to also keep them unloaded and disassembled. How insane is that? By the way, nothing was said regarding conceal carry weapons(CCW).

The Mayor of D.C., Adrian Fenty quickly said that the ruling would be appealed. Then this man who has abridged the rights of his citizens said something that shocked even this writer. Fenty, a liberal democrat declared:

"I am personally, deeply disappointed and quite frankly outraged"

Now, that comment takes nerve. Here we have a Mayor who advocates depriving American citizens of a basic Constitutional/human right, saying that he is outraged. If anything, it should be the good citizens of Washington, D.C. who should be outraged over the words of this draconian little man. However, Fenty's position is typical of liberals. Liberals love being in control of people: and they love having individuals "Dependent On Them." This is a clear case of how liberals covet power over "We The People."

Instead of applauding the Federal Appeals Court's decision, Fenty and other anti-gun proponents assailed this ruling. Why is this man who has police protection so adamantly opposed to citizens having the right to protect themselves against the night crawlers in their city? Again, the answer can be found in the liberal's manual of "Dependence and Learned Helplessness."

Fenty would rather see innocent people murdered rather then be given the chance to defend themselves. His assistant police chief read what amounted to be a prepared statement from Sarah Brady's group. He cited the same old lame reason as to why citizens should not be allowed to arm themselves. The assistant chief said that if D.C. residents are allowed to armed themselves, young people would in essence turn the city into a bloodbath. I wanted to ask him, you mean things would get worse? Like D.C. is a model city for non-violence. Get real Mr. police chief!!!

This dumbo and the rest of those against Americans exercising their Second Amendment Rights know full well that "More Guns Cause Less Crime." He shoud read John Lott's book on this subject. But then, people like that aren't interested in the truth. Come to think of it, what liberal that you know is interesting in the truth? Liberals are good at muddying the water with their nonsense. They lack the ability to form a coherent argument on most societal issues.

The issue of guns is no different. Each time a court rules in favor of CCW's, I can guarantee you that a liberal will come out with a frightening message of, "The Streets Will Run Red With Blood." Guess what? It has never happened. But, that hasn't stopped these purveyors of misinformation.

By the way, the lone dissenter in the D.C. case, Judge Karen Henderson wrote that the Second Amendment does not apply to the Nation's Capitol, because it is not a state. Honestly, she wrote that. And this woman is suppose to be intelligent.

Again, liberals don't make sense when they argue the dynamics of societal issues.

This case will probably wind its way all the way up to the U.S. Supreme Court. If so, it will be the first case of its kind to reach the Supremes in almost 70-years.

Here is hoping that the Justices will finally settle this matter once and for all.

Then, Sarah Brady and her legion of anti-gun nuts will have to find another line of work.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Psychologists tell us that by the time that we are six years of age--our personalities are set. In other words, we have been taught to be assertive, or we have been taught to cower in the presence of an authoritative figure.

It is our parents who are the ones who shape us into the human beings we will be. Of course our friends play a role too. However, it is our parents who are given the charge to influence our personalities on a grander scale. There are several styles of parenting:

* Authoritarian

* Authoritative

* Non-Involved

* Permissive

The authoritarian parent is just that. There is no room for discussion with the authoritarian parent. There are some libs like this. However, I do not believe that this style of parenting will be found in the majority of the homes of liberals. The authoritative parent is democratic in his/her style of parenting. In other words, the child is allowed to be himself. He is allowed to proffer an opinion. He is also allowed to disagree with his parents. However, in the authoritative home, the parents will ultimately have the last say. The non-involved parent simply can't be found. They are more interested in making money than shaping the lives of their offspring. Finally, the permissive parent is where I believe most liberals come from.

The permissive parent gives his child anything that he/she wants. The child is raised to be narcissistic in nature. He is taught that he is special. In fact, he is taught by his permissive parents that he/she is better than "Those Other People." To help him to feel better, a pinch of altruism is thrown in. The child coming from the home of permissive parents belives that giving away money will make his friends like him even more. This type of child can also be unforgiving. In fact, if you happen to land on his bad side, he will not rest until he exacts revenge. Is this starting to sound like a socialist liberal to you now? Good.

The child who emerges from the family of permissive individuals is not taught what it is to be a man. His role model is linguine spined. Conversely, the female is not taught what it is to be a true lady. We have all encountered people like the permissive child while in public school or in college. They form their own "Clicks." Guess who is the center of attention? If you said the permissive child, you are right.

Entering adulthood, the child from permissive parents feel that the world should revolve around him/her. They thus seek out employment where they "Are In Charge." The message goes forth clearly, "It's Either The Bosses Way--Or The Highway." These people have no concept as to what the word empathy means. They look at empathy as being flawed. After all, these are "Special People," just ask their parents.

There is no room for dissension in the world of the permissive child. There is only one opinion--that is the opinion of the permissive child. Are they closed minded? What do you think of Hillary Rodham-Clinton, Chuck Shumer, Harry Reid, Nancy Pelosi, John Kohn-Kerry, John Murtha, Al Gore, Bill Clinton, etc? Do you really believe that you could hold a decent conversation with these people without having to yield the floor to their brillance?

Back in my day, a liberal was a nice and kind individual. If they disagreed with you, they expressed their opposition. In expressing their opposition, they were able to "THINK." Today's liberals are shallow thinkers. In other words, there is no depth to their thinking. There is no depth to their thinking, because their arguments for the most part can be ripped to shreds in seconds.

Today's liberals are a danger to America. Oh, I know that they will tell you that they "Love The Troops, And They Love America." However, take a look at what they stand for. It it antithetical to what "True Americans" stand for.

Liberals have a right to their opinion. However, they seem to forget this when they are confronted by someone with different ideas. It is as though they lack the ability to engage in "Mental Shifting." Now, that is scary. And these people think they are "Great Thinkers."

I love revealing the thin veneer that covers liberals. You know the ones who try to pretend to not be liberal: however, you know from the initial tone of their conversation that they are "Spineless Liberals." They are the "touchy, feel good, and can't we all just get along people." Beware of this type. They are trying to set you up "To Be Controlled."

If you probe deep into these people, they will eventually show their true colors.  And when a liberal gets angry, he/she loses all sense of direction. It is as though he is suffering from paranoid schizophrenia. His conversation becomes tangential (NEVER REACHING A CONCLUSION) and he is all over the map with his discourse. Why is this? The "Spinless Liberal Has Lost Control."

I love getting under the skin of a "Spineless Liberal."

Try it sometime. It is very therapeutic.

Remember to deal with the process, and avoid getting hung up on content. Process is looking deeper into a particular issue. Content is just that. You simply do not want to argue with a liberal, staying in the content area. The liberal wants to keep you there, because his/her knowledge of any of today's societal issues is limited.

Trust me on this one folks.

Finally, do not give these people power to scare you. They are just superficial spineless liberals. Once you get past their defenses and tired rhetoric, they break down and "Act Like Babies."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Socialists democrats must really think that George W. Bush is an idiot. That slinky weasel, Harry Reid, and boozer Ted Kennedy have called on the President to "Pledge" to not pardon Louis "Scooter" Libby. Why would these two scoundrels crawl from out the wood work less than twenty four hours after the man is convicted on charges of lying and obstructing a leak investigation--to demand that the President let this lifetime government servant go to prison?

Both Reid and Kennedy are acting for political reasons. But, you've got to be quick on the uptake in order to look into their dark souls--where you will find their reasoning. Let me explain--because I know these hypocrites like the back of my hand. If Bush were to pardon Libby at this very moment--Reid and Kennedy and the rest of the socialist democrats would scream "Bloody Murder." Remember, "Special Prosecutor" Patrick Fitzgerald tried like hell to nail Karl Rove--or better yet, the Vice President for releasing of the name of Valerie Plame--the alleged "Covert" secret service agent. When Fitzgerald could't catch the big fish that he really wanted in his legal net, he had to settle for I. Lewis Libby. By the way, Plame was not a covert secret service agent at the time her name was publicized by syndicated columnist, Robert Novak.

At any rate, keep in mind, it was the wackos from the crazy left who kept chanting, "Bush Lied About Weapons Of Mass Destruction." Eventually, after being repeated over and over again--and getting constant air play from the socialist press--this lie, "Became The Truth," at least in the minds of  the loons on the left. Politicians like Hillary Rodham-Clinton were quick to join the ranks of these neer-do-wells. She now claims that she was lied to by the President. The woman is a "Solid Gold Phoney."

Meantime, Valerie Plame's do nothing husband, "Ambassador" Joseph Wilson, if you will recalled, was dispatched to Niger by none other than, "Valerie Plame," to look into allegations that Saddam Hussein was purchasing "Yellow Cake." The mendacious Wilson initially reported that Vice President Cheney had sent him to Niger.

Wilson rushed back to the U.S. and wrote an op-ed piece in the left's favorite newspaper, The New York Times, stating that the story about Hussein was not true.  This from only "One Man," who had apparently looked under every rock in this African country. Anyone with half a brain understands that Wilson had his report written well before he left the U.S. So, in essence he took a free trip at our expensive.

The socialist press played it up like it was Libby who blew Plame's cover in order to get back at her husband, Joe Wilson--the indolent, "Ambassador" for making the Bush administration "Look Bad." Actually, it was the former Assistant Secretary of State, Richard Armitage who told the press of Plame's status. However, Fitzgerald was not looking for the truth. He wanted to burn someone from the Bush Administration, "Real Bad." Enter the sacrificial lamb, I. Lewis Libby.

Notice that Libby "WAS NOT"  found guilty of revealing Plame's alleged covert status. He was found guilty of, (a) Lying, (b) Obstructing a leak investigation. And for that, he faces a quarter of a century behind bars.  He will be sentenced on June 5, 2007.

Now, if Bush were to be so stupid as to pardon Libby--you see where this would go. Bush would be accused of being in on this from the very beginning--the releasing of Plame's name to the public. Could the "Star Struck" prosecutor re-open his investigation? You bet that he could. Would he? What do you think?

The socialist press would run this story well into the 2008 Presidential election if Fitzgerald went after Bush. The mouthpieces would be there with bated breath to help him--even if it meant "Lying." Hell, that hasn't stopped these shills for the democrat party in the past.

In the meantime, please consider what William Jefferson Clinton did in the last hours of his Presidency. This poor excuse for a president pardoned Marc Rich. Who is Marc Rich? Before "BJ" Clinton got all "Misty-Eyed" over how our goverment was treating the multimillionaire, Rich had fled to Switzerland, where he set up residence. He quickly dumped his wife, and married a local girl.

Rich left his adopted land, the United States, after the U.S. Attorney was hot on his heels with indictments charging him with:

* Tax evasion

* Fraud

* Trading with the enemy

On the latter charge, Rich was caught "Red handed," trading with Iran, during the hostage crisis.

Before leaving office, Clinton told Rich to "Come Home," all is forgiven. With the stroke of a pen, he wiped this criminal's slate clean.

Keep in mind that Rich's wife, Denise Rich had raised and given to the Democratic Party more than $1 Million dollars over the years. She had also given the Clintons $10,000 for their legal defense fund; and donated more than $7,000 in furniture to these two leeches.

Where was Harry Reid at during this time? Where was Ted Kennedy? Never mind the question about Kennedy location. He was probably bending his elbow at the local pub.

Mr. Bush, Lewis Libby is not a criminal. Do the right thing. Days before you leave office, pardon this great American.

Tell Harry Reid and the rest of those in his socialists party to get into a single file, and run, not walk, to the nearest pier and  do the right thing, "Jump"!!! 

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM  

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Hillary Clinton is an embrassment. So, is Barrack Hussein Obama. Both of these idiots made complete fools of themselves while in Selma, Alabama recently. However, you wouldn't know it by the coverage of the socialist press. They gave both Clinton and Obama a pass on their tomfoolery. If a republican had done what Hillary Clinton did in Selma--that person would have been burned at the media stake.

Clinton had to get hubby Bill from out of the arms of some bimbo in order to boost her amorphous standings with African-Americans. This woman had the nerve to stand in an African-American pulpit, and announce:

 "I Ain't Nowheres Tired, I Came Too Far From Where I Started From. Nobody, Told Me That The Road Would Be Easy, But I Don't Belive He Brought Me This Far To Leave me"

To make  matters worse, this "Yankee" used a faked--atrocious southern accent. As a son of the south, I saw red. Face it, a lot of northerners look at those of us from the south as being stupid, someone who just fell off the proverbial "haywagon." Then, you have this panderer invading the south making fun of the way that we speak. All true southerners should be outraged at this carpetbagger. The woman simply has no shame. Not one single ounce of shame in her bloated body!!!

As an African-American, I am especially infuriated at Hillary Clinton performing a parody on the late Reverend James Cleveland's famous song. This song was a rallying cry for many of us in the Black Church in the 1960's. It gave us strength and hope. And this bimbo comes along--not understanding the true meaning of this Black Spiritual--and makes a mockery out of it. What a complete buffoon. But, what about the Black audience who hailed Queen Hillary's rendention of the Reverend James Cleveland's song? Suffice it to say, some people have no pride or shame.

Meantime, Obama had the unmitigated gall to say that he is the result of the civil rights movement. Say what? Next, he told his church audience, people have asked me "Have I Been To Semla Be-Fo?" That's right Obama get into your ebonics--even though you were born in Hawaii--and graduated from law school at Harvard. How insulting. Yet, the Blacks in attendance didn't seem bothered by these two chuckleheads.

Standing next to Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton looked like a lost child. This woman is far from presidential timber. In fact, I find her entire presentation laughable. She really believes that she can reinvent herself and that Americans are too stupid to see the metamorphosis taking place before their very eyes.

After witnessing her fiasco in Selma, I am now confident that Hillary Clinton will never be President of these United States.

Americans are simply not that desperate.

To you socialists libs who say George Bush is stupid--Hillary Clinton makes Bush look like Albert Einstein and Winston Churchill rolled up into one.

I say bring on the 2008 Presidential Elections. The republicans will keep control of  the White House--if Hillary Clinton is the standard bearer for her liberal socialists democrat party.

This woman makes Freddy Kruger look like "Times Man Of The Year."

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM

BY: DR. FOREST LEWIS

Yet another female teacher has been charged with having sex with her students. This time, middle school teacher, Allenna Williams Ward, of Clinton, South Carolina, is charged with having sex with no less than five young boys.

Ward is a married woman. However, that apparently didn't stop this lusty lass from allowing fourteen and fifteen year old boys from having their way with her. Some may ask, what is going on in America? Allow me to proffer this hypothesis. America has opened pandora's box on a number of heretofore issues that we kept heavily under wraps: we once respected one another;but more importantly, we possessed a devout belief in God Almighty. I know that polls will tell you that Americans "Believe In God." However, belief in God is "Not Enough." Those that came before us made God the "Center" of their lives. Today, many Americans "Believe They Are God." Sundays in America today are used to ripped down the highway to nearest mall:or to take in other endeavors that are not God connected on this once sacred day.

Parents by and large have given up being parents. Many are more interested in being their child's "Best Friend." The child is allowed to do whatever he or she pleases. If they don't get their way, they throw a "Hissy Fit." Hence, we have an upsurge in narcissism among our young people. Life is all about them. An entire generation has been reared to think of only themselves. And we can lay the blame for their egoism at our doorsteps. Yes, it is you and I who are responsible for the laxity that exists in our society today.

Divorces are easily obtainable today. Hell, if you don't like that your wife did not make the bed--file for divorce. Americans appear to no longer want to work on their marriages. It is sheer fantasy, the idea that "Marriages Are Made In Heaven." I have a little experience in this area. I have been married to the same woman for "Thirty-Four Years." No, each day has not been blissful. However, we both work at our marriage. Perhaps most importantly, we discuss the salient issues that impact upon our marriage. There are "No Secrets." Oh, our children? They are just that, "Our Children." Not our best friends.

I think that it is safe to say that never in the annals of American history have we witnessed so many pedophiles in our society. They are allowed to flourish--because of our permissive courts. When a judge says a convicted child molester "Is Too Short" to go to prison, what kind of message is that sending to these rodents? When a judge sentences a convicted child molester "To Probation" what type of message is the judge sending to this type of scum? The message is simple. "I (Some Judges) don't give a damn about the welfare of children."

America has changed a lot--the result of the tumultuous 1960's. Some of what came out of that era was good, however, a lot of it has been a nightmare. The Black family has been lost--thanks to the social program known as "Welfare."

There are number of special interest groups who are attempting to define what type of society that we will be in the future. Some scribes call these people "Secular Progressives." Many of you already know how I fee about this misplaced term. Those who use this term are in essence giving credence to this radical/cancerous movement. Personally, I do not believe that those who use this term have consulted a dictionary; or when they do, they see what they want to see, relative to definition. I have learned over the years to "Not Argue With An Idiot." The idiot is lonely; and if he/she can engage you in an argument that will ultimately leave you in "A Swamp," babbling to yourself--they will gleefully leave the scene, looking for new challenges.

Have you noticed that there is no longer right or wrong in our society today? Incredibly, there are people who would argue in defense of Beelzebub. Nothing shocks me about the demeanor of the American people today. We have become desensitized to all of the idiocy that surrounds us. It doesn't mean that the craziness is right. I am simply saying that there are those from the lunatic radical left who are willing to do whatever it takes to bring about the demise of this once great land.

The radical left has gained so much power in this country that they can make some individuals kow-tow to their demands. There are many Americans in Universities--the Federal Government, etc. who are petrified to say how they truly feel about social issues. If they step out of line, the wackos on the left are ready to drop the hammer on them. So, rather than expressing how they feel--these people become part and parcel of what is called groupthink. In other words, everyone sings out of the same hymn book. This is not the America that I grew up in--and fought for--and bled for. Until people get tired of being pushed around--and fight back, "Using Their Intellect," the status-quo will continue. Correction, this beast that is eating away at our moral fiber will grow exponentially.

So, what does all of this have to do with little Miss hotpants, Allenna Williams Ward down in Clinton, South Carolina? People like this pedophile is what is wrong with America. They are a cancer on our society. We have allowed this cancer to germinate. Instead of having it surgically removed at the first sight--we have unwittingly carefully nurtured and groomed this malignancy. We have encouraged this outrageous behavior via our taciturn behavior.Thus, this societal cancer has metastasized.

America is badly in need of a gigantic infusion of testosterone. We need men to be men. We need men to have enough backbone to stand up and tell the truth: and to not do an about face and apologize when the socialists democrats begin the howl: because howl they will.

We need women to be women--strong, but at the same time be feminine. I know a strong woman when I see one. And I respect her strength. However, I don't need a woman to "Lower Her Voice" in order to show me that she can be as masculine as I am.

Our children need both a father and a mother. We need to nix this ridiculous notion that those of the same gender can raise healthy children. If the Creator wanted that, we would have had "Adam And Steve," not "Adam And Eve" in the Garden Of Eden. I know that I lost those of you from the lunatic left with this last statement. As I see it, my writings are not to please you, but to inform. If this troubles you, "Deal With It."

Folks, America is at a crossroads. We can either continue to take this suicidal path that those from the radical left would like us to pursue--or we can stop this madness--and rediscover the decency and respect that was bequeathed to us by our ancestors.

FRIENDS OF "THE TRUTH"

WWW.CAPITOLHILLCOFFEEHOUSE.COM

WWW.TALKSTREAMLIVE.COM